Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(9):1346-1351. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1922454. Epub 2021 May 25.
Stressful life events (SLEs) are a risk factor for alcohol use problems, and there is a need for identification of factors that may offset this risk. Resilience is uniquely, inversely associated with alcohol use, but there remains a dearth of research examining the buffering effect of resilience toward alcohol use problems in the context of SLEs. This study used prospective data from an epidemiological twin sample (=7441) to test whether resilience at Time 1 would act as a buffer for new onset SLEs (e.g. assault, marital problems) against risk for alcohol dependence (AD) symptoms at Time 2. The final model, adjusted for familial relatedness and controlling for demographic covariates and Time 1 (lifetime) AD symptoms, identified significant main effects of resilience and SLEs; those with greater resilience at Time 1 reported fewer symptoms (β=-.087, <.001) and those with greater new-onset SLEs reported greater symptoms (β=.116, <.001) at Time 2. However, there was no significant interaction (β=-.008, >.05). Although findings further support the association of resilience and SLEs with AD, results do not support the conceptualization of resilience as a buffer against the impact of future life stressors on alcohol use outcomes. This suggests other factors may be more relevant for understanding protective factors for alcohol use problems or the relation between resilience and SLEs on alcohol use outcomes.
生活应激事件(SLEs)是酒精使用问题的一个风险因素,因此需要确定可能抵消这种风险的因素。韧性与酒精使用呈独特的负相关,但仍缺乏研究来检验韧性在 SLEs 背景下对酒精使用问题的缓冲作用。本研究使用来自一项流行病学双胞胎样本(=7441)的前瞻性数据,检验了在 1 时间点的韧性是否会对新出现的 SLEs(例如袭击、婚姻问题)对 2 时间点酒精依赖(AD)症状的风险起到缓冲作用。在调整了家族相关性并控制了人口统计学协变量和 1 时间点(终生)AD 症状后,最终模型确定了韧性和 SLEs 的显著主效应;在 1 时间点具有更高韧性的个体报告的症状较少(β=-.087,<.001),而新出现 SLEs 较多的个体报告的症状较多(β=.116,<.001)。然而,交互作用不显著(β=-.008,>.05)。尽管这些发现进一步支持了韧性和 SLEs 与 AD 之间的关联,但结果并不支持将韧性概念化为对未来生活应激源对酒精使用结果的影响的缓冲。这表明,其他因素可能更能解释酒精使用问题的保护因素,或者韧性与 SLEs 对酒精使用结果的关系。