Department of Restorative Sciences, University of Costa Rica, Montes de Oca, San José 11502, Costa Rica.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araraquara, SP 14800-903, Brazil.
Scanning. 2021 May 6;2021:6617930. doi: 10.1155/2021/6617930. eCollection 2021.
To evaluate the push-out bond strength of premixed and powder-liquid bioceramic sealers with or without gutta-percha (GP) cone.
Radicular dentin samples were prepared from 80 single-rooted human teeth. After root canal preparation using ProTaper® and irrigation with NaOCl and EDTA, teeth were divided according to the root canal sealer ( = 20): AH Plus®, EndoSequence® BC Sealer™, ProRoot® Endo Sealer, and BioRoot™ RCS. Samples were randomly divided into two subgroups ( = 10): GP-S: root canal filling using the single-cone technique, or S: filling with only sealer. Specimens were kept at 37°C and 100% humidity in calcium-free PBS for 30 days. The push-out bond strength was measured in MPa. Fractured specimens were observed at 25x to evaluate the type of failure. pH and calcium ion release were measured at different experimental periods. Raman and SEM-EDAX analyses were performed for root canal sealers. Data were analysed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey test at a significance of < 0.05.
Push-out bond strength was greater for samples obturated with only sealers (S) than samples obturated with the single-cone technique (GP-S) ( < 0.05). BioRoot™ RCS had greater bond strength than EndoSequence® BC Sealer™. Adhesive failures between cement and gutta-percha cone (87.5%) were predominant in the GP-S. Cohesive failures were predominant for S (80%). BioRoot™ RCS and ProRoot® ES presented higher alkalinization potential than the premixed sealer (EndoSequence® BC Sealer™). Powder-liquid bioceramic sealers (BioRoot™ RCS and ProRoot® ES) released the highest cumulative amount of calcium (28.46 mg/L and 20.05 mg/L).
Push-out test without gutta-percha cone presents higher bond strength for bioceramic sealers. Powder-liquid calcium silicate-based sealers present greater bioactivity related to alkalinization potential and calcium ion release.
评估预混粉液型生物陶瓷根管封闭剂与牙胶尖(GP)联合使用或不联合使用时的推出强度。
从 80 颗单根人牙中制备根管牙本质样本。使用 ProTaper®根管预备系统和 NaOCl 和 EDTA 冲洗后,根据根管封闭剂(每组 20 个样本)将牙齿分为:AH Plus®、EndoSequence® BC 根管封闭剂、ProRoot® Endo 根管封闭剂和 BioRoot™ RCS。样本随机分为两组(每组 10 个样本):GP-S:采用单尖技术进行根管充填,S:仅用封闭剂进行充填。将样本在无钙 PBS 中于 37°C 和 100%湿度下保存 30 天。以 MPa 为单位测量推出强度。以 25x 观察断裂样本,以评估失效类型。在不同的实验阶段测量 pH 值和钙离子释放。对根管封闭剂进行拉曼和 SEM-EDAX 分析。使用三因素方差分析(ANOVA)和事后 Tukey 检验对数据进行分析,显著性水平为 < 0.05。
仅用封闭剂(S)封闭的样本的推出强度大于用单尖技术(GP-S)封闭的样本(< 0.05)。BioRoot™ RCS 的粘结强度大于 EndoSequence® BC 根管封闭剂。在 GP-S 中,主要为水泥与牙胶尖之间的黏附性失败(87.5%)。在 S 中,主要为内聚性失败(80%)。BioRoot™ RCS 和 ProRoot® ES 的碱化能力高于预混型封闭剂(EndoSequence® BC 根管封闭剂)。粉液型生物陶瓷根管封闭剂(BioRoot™ RCS 和 ProRoot® ES)释放的钙离子总量最高(28.46 mg/L 和 20.05 mg/L)。
不使用牙胶尖的推出试验中,生物陶瓷封闭剂的粘结强度更高。粉液型硅酸钙基封闭剂具有更强的生物活性,与碱化能力和钙离子释放有关。