Suppr超能文献

传统三氧化矿物凝聚体、生物陶瓷、一种改良三氧化矿物凝聚体以及两种新型抗菌增强三氧化矿物凝聚体的推出粘结强度的比较评估

Comparative Evaluation of Push-Out Bond Strength of Conventional Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Biodentine, a Modified Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Two Novel Antibacterial-Enhanced Mineral Trioxide Aggregates.

作者信息

Shancy Merlin Arokia Rajkumar, Ravindran Vignesh, Jeevanandan Ganesh, Eswaramoorthy Rajalakshmanan, Arthanari Abirami

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

Center of Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Mar 17;16(3):e56320. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56320. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background The challenges associated with incorporating antimicrobial agents, such as the potential diminishment of the cement's physical properties, highlight the need for comprehensive evaluations. Balancing antimicrobial efficacy with the maintenance of structural integrity is a crucial aspect of material development. The acknowledgment of cytotoxic properties associated with tricalcium aluminate, a major constituent in conventional mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), is critical in terms of long-term evaluation of treatment procedures. The primary focus of the push-out test is to evaluate the resistance of the tested material to dislodgement. Greater push-out strength implies stronger adhesion between the tested material and the tooth surface. Aim This study aims to evaluate the push-out bond strength of two antibacterial-enhanced MTAs with conventional MTA and Biodentine. Material and methods A total of five materials were tested: a) modified MTA, b) doxycycline-enhanced MTA, c) metronidazole-enhanced MTA, d) conventional MTA, and e) Biodentine. All the materials were mixed based on a predetermined powder:liquid ratio and then carried using a plastic instrument to the desired experimental design. Single-rooted permanent teeth, preferably incisors, were used in the present study. Teeth were embedded vertically in a rubber mold, and sectioning of the tooth was performed. A single operator instrumented the canal space in each slice using Gates-Glidden burs, and the mixed cements were placed in the respective groups and stored for 72 hours. A push-out test was carried out using a universal testing machine. Following the bond failure, the slices were examined under a stereomicroscope to determine the nature of the bond failure. The collected data was subjected to a one-way analysis of variance test, post hoc test, and chi-square test for statistical analysis. Results The mean push-out bond strength was found to be the highest for Biodentine (43.25 ± 0.62 megapascals (MPa)), followed by doxycycline- and metronidazole-enhanced MTAs (39.54 ± 0.65 MPa and 39.29 ± 0.16 MPa, respectively), modified MTA formulation (37.75 ± 0.73 MPa), and the lowest for conventional MTA (25.93 ± 0.7 MPa). Conventional MTA samples had an adhesive failure (89.4%), while Biodentine samples had a cohesive failure (80.3%). Mixed failures were noticed with the samples containing modified MTA formulation (71.3%), doxycycline-enhanced MTA (76.6%), and metronidazole-enhanced MTA (78.0%). Conclusion Despite not surpassing Biodentine in bond strength, antibacterial-enhanced MTAs are considered potential alternatives to conventional MTA in day-to-day clinical practice.

摘要

背景

与加入抗菌剂相关的挑战,如水泥物理性能可能降低,凸显了进行全面评估的必要性。在材料开发中,平衡抗菌效果与维持结构完整性是一个关键方面。认识到传统矿物三氧化物聚合体(MTA)的主要成分铝酸三钙具有细胞毒性,对于治疗程序的长期评估至关重要。推出试验的主要重点是评估受试材料的抗脱位能力。推出强度越高,表明受试材料与牙面之间的粘结越强。

目的

本研究旨在评估两种两种两种抗菌增强型MTA与传统MTA和生物陶瓷(Biodentine)的推出粘结强度。

材料与方法

共测试了五种材料:a)改性MTA,b)强力霉素增强型MTA,c)甲硝唑增强型MTA,d)传统MTA,e)生物陶瓷(Biodentine)。所有材料均按照预定的粉液比混合,然后用塑料器械输送至所需的实验设计中。本研究使用单根恒牙,最好是切牙。将牙齿垂直嵌入橡胶模具中,并进行牙齿切片。由一名操作人员使用盖茨-格利登钻针在每个切片的根管空间进行预备,将混合好的水门汀放入相应组中并储存72小时。使用万能试验机进行推出试验。粘结失败后,在体视显微镜下检查切片,以确定粘结失败的性质。对收集到的数据进行单因素方差分析、事后检验和卡方检验以进行统计分析。

结果

发现生物陶瓷(Biodentine)的平均推出粘结强度最高(43.25±0.62兆帕(MPa)),其次是强力霉素和甲硝唑增强型MTA(分别为39.54±0.65 MPa和39.29±0.16 MPa)、改性MTA配方(37.75±0.73 MPa),传统MTA最低(25.93±0.7 MPa)。传统MTA样本出现粘结失败(89.4%),而生物陶瓷(Biodentine)样本出现内聚破坏(80.3%)。含有改性MTA配方(71.3%)、强力霉素增强型MTA(76.6%)和甲硝唑增强型MTA(78.0%)的样本出现混合破坏。

结论

尽管抗菌增强型MTA的粘结强度未超过生物陶瓷(Biodentine),但在日常临床实践中,抗菌增强型MTA被认为是传统MTA的潜在替代品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6e6/11019474/93848b48e7d0/cureus-0016-00000056320-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验