Suppr超能文献

脉冲式缩宫素引产:一项随机前瞻性对照研究。

Pulsatile oxytocin for induction of labor: a randomized prospective controlled study.

作者信息

Odem R R, Work B A, Dawood M Y

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 1988;16(1):31-7. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1988.16.1.31.

Abstract

In a prospective randomized study, 20 patients with term pregnancies underwent induction of labor with either continuous or pulsed (every 8 minutes) intravenous oxytocin infusion. There were no significant differences with respect to induction-labor interval, induction-delivery interval, cesarean section rates, need for pain relief and Apgar scores. Sixty percent of patients receiving continuous oxytocin infusion developed uterine hyperstimulation but only 10% receiving pulsed oxytocin did so. However, the difference was not significant. The mean +/- SEM total amount of oxytocin given by continuous infusion was 4237 +/- 1066 mU which was 70% more than by pulsatile infusion (2454 +/- 808 mU). The highest rate of oxytocin infused was significantly lower by pulsatile administration (5.2 +/- 0.8 mU/min) than by continuous infusion (9.2 +/- 1.8 mU/min, p = less than 0.05). Our study demonstrates that pulsed administration of oxytocin every 8 minutes is as effective and safe as continuous intravenous infusion of oxytocin for induction of labor, requires less oxytocin with therefore, a wider margin of safety and is consistent with the pulsatile release of oxytocin during normal labor.

摘要

在一项前瞻性随机研究中,20名足月妊娠患者接受了连续或脉冲式(每8分钟一次)静脉滴注缩宫素引产。在引产至分娩间隔、引产至分娩间隔、剖宫产率、止痛需求和阿普加评分方面,两组无显著差异。接受连续缩宫素输注的患者中有60%出现子宫过度刺激,但接受脉冲式缩宫素输注的患者中只有10%出现这种情况。然而,差异并不显著。连续输注缩宫素的平均总量±标准误为4237±1066 mU,比脉冲式输注(2454±808 mU)多70%。脉冲式给药的缩宫素最高输注速率(5.2±0.8 mU/分钟)显著低于连续输注(9.2±1.8 mU/分钟,p<0.05)。我们的研究表明,每8分钟脉冲式给药缩宫素与连续静脉输注缩宫素引产同样有效和安全,所需缩宫素较少,因此安全性更高,且与正常分娩期间缩宫素的脉冲式释放一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验