Perales A J, Diago V J, Monleón-Sancho J, Grifol R, Dominguez R, Minguez J A, Monleón J
Servicio de Obstetricia, Hospital Maternal La Fe, Universitat de Valencia, Spain.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1994;255(3):119-23. doi: 10.1007/BF02390938.
In a prospective study, 140 patients had an oxytocin challenge test with either a continuous or a pulsed infusion (one minute of infusion in every five minutes). Both infusion regimens had similar success rates in terms of uterine contractions (97.1 vs 98.6%). The potency ratio (pulsed versus continuous infusion) was significant at 2.7 (1.27 to 5.2), which means that more uterine activity was induced with each mU of oxytocin with pulsatile than with continuous administration. The total amount of oxytocin required to obtain three good contractions in 10 minutes was about 40% less with pulsed administration than with continuous infusion, but the test took 40 minutes longer with the pulsed than with the continuous infusion (P < 0.01).
在一项前瞻性研究中,140例患者接受了缩宫素激惹试验,采用持续输注或脉冲式输注(每5分钟输注1分钟)。两种输注方案在子宫收缩方面的成功率相似(分别为97.1%和98.6%)。效价比(脉冲式输注与持续输注)为2.7(1.27至5.2),具有显著性差异,这意味着与持续给药相比,每毫单位缩宫素脉冲式给药诱导的子宫活动更多。脉冲式给药获得10分钟内3次良好宫缩所需的缩宫素总量比持续输注少约40%,但脉冲式输注试验比持续输注试验所需时间长40分钟(P<0.01)。