Girma Abel, Ayalew Ermias, Mesafint Gebremeskel
Department of Reproductive Health and Human Nutrition, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia.
Department of Nursing, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 May 20;17:1551-1561. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S308394. eCollection 2021.
The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented a great threat to the physical and mental health of the general population. Patients with chronic disease have always been vulnerable to stressful life conditions. Therefore, determining the perceived stress and coping strategies among chronic disease patients is crucial to minimize the mental health consequences related to the outbreak.
This study aimed to determine COVID-19-related stress and coping strategies among adults with chronic disease in southwest Ethiopia.
An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 613 randomly selected adults with chronic disease in southwest Ethiopia. A multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between the COVID-19-related stress score and coping strategy types, and independent sample -tests and ANOVA tests were conducted. Statistical significance was accepted at -values <0.05.
More than two-thirds of study participants (68.4%) were moderately stressed, 13.9% were severely stressed, and 17.8% had low levels of perceived stress. Active coping (=1.238, 95% CI: 0.0 to 2.477), denial (=3.678, 95% CI: 2.44 to 4.915), behavioral disengagement (=3.669, 95% CI: 2.193 to 5.146), self-blame (=1.722, 95% CI: 0.146 to 3.297), and religion (=3.443, 95% CI: 2.028 to 4.858) coping strategies positively predicted the COVID-19-related stress score. Only the acceptance coping strategy (=-2.710, 95% CI: -3.926 to -1.493) negatively predicted the COVID-19-related stress score.
Significant numbers of participants suffered from moderate to severe perceived stress levels due to the COVID-19 outbreak. Both adaptive and maladaptive coping strategy types were significantly associated positively and negatively with perceived stress score among adults with chronic disease. There were significant differences in the mean scores of perceived stress and categories of variables such as family size, duration of disease, and age of the participants.
2019年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的爆发对普通人群的身心健康构成了巨大威胁。慢性病患者一直易受紧张生活状况的影响。因此,确定慢性病患者的感知压力和应对策略对于将与疫情相关的心理健康后果降至最低至关重要。
本研究旨在确定埃塞俄比亚西南部慢性病成年人中与COVID-19相关的压力和应对策略。
在埃塞俄比亚西南部对613名随机选择的慢性病成年人进行了一项基于机构的横断面研究。采用多元线性回归分析来确定与COVID-19相关的压力得分与应对策略类型之间的关系,并进行独立样本t检验和方差分析。当p值<0.05时接受统计学显著性。
超过三分之二的研究参与者(68.4%)有中度压力,13.9%有重度压力,17.8%的感知压力水平较低。积极应对(β=1.238,95%置信区间:0.0至2.477)、否认(β=3.678,95%置信区间:2.44至4.915)、行为脱离(β=3.669,95%置信区间:2.193至5.146)、自责(β=1.722,95%置信区间:0.146至3.297)和宗教(β=3.443,95%置信区间:2.028至4.858)应对策略正向预测与COVID-19相关的压力得分。只有接受应对策略(β=-2.710,95%置信区间:-3.926至-1.493)负向预测与COVID-19相关的压力得分。
由于COVID-19疫情爆发,大量参与者遭受中度至重度的感知压力水平。适应性和适应不良的应对策略类型在慢性病成年人中与感知压力得分均存在显著的正相关和负相关。在感知压力的平均得分以及家庭规模、病程和参与者年龄等变量类别方面存在显著差异。