• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国接受常见精神障碍住院治疗的员工:与首次和完全重返工作岗位时间相关的因素。

Employees Receiving Inpatient Treatment for Common Mental Disorders in Germany: Factors Associated with Time to First and Full Return to Work.

机构信息

Division 3 Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Mar;32(1):114-127. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-09985-4. Epub 2021 May 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-021-09985-4
PMID:34050882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8858919/
Abstract

Purpose In Germany, return to work (RTW) after inpatient treatment for common mental disorders (CMDs) is a complex process at the intersection of the mental healthcare system and the workplace. This study examined (1) the time to first and full RTW and (2) associated factors among employees receiving inpatient treatment for CMDs. Methods In this prospective cohort study, employees receiving inpatient psychiatric or medical rehabilitation treatment for CMDs were interviewed by phone during their last week before discharge. Follow-up interviews were conducted after 6, 12, and 18 months. Health-, personal, and work-related factors were used from baseline measurement. Parametric survival analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with time to first and full RTW. Results A total of N = 269 participants who stayed at a psychiatric clinic or a medical rehabilitation facility were included. Almost all participants (n = 252, 94%) from both treatment settings reported a first RTW and a full RTW. The time to first and full RTW was shortest among participants from medical rehabilitation (both median 6 days) and longer among participants from psychiatric treatment (median 17 days to first RTW and 73 days to full RTW). While only health-related and personal factors were associated with time to first RTW, leadership quality and needed individual RTW support were associated with time to full RTW. Conclusions More attention to work accommodation needs for RTW in clinical practice and coordinated actions towards RTW in collaboration with key RTW stakeholders in the workplace may support a timely RTW.Clinical Registration Number DRKS00010903, retrospectively registered.

摘要

目的

在德国,因常见精神障碍(CMD)接受住院治疗后重返工作岗位(RTW)是医疗保健系统和工作场所交叉的一个复杂过程。本研究考察了(1)首次和完全 RTW 的时间,以及(2)接受 CMD 住院治疗的员工的相关因素。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,在出院前的最后一周,通过电话对接受住院精神科或医疗康复治疗的员工进行访谈。在 6、12 和 18 个月后进行随访访谈。基线测量时使用健康、个人和工作相关因素。进行参数生存分析以确定与首次和完全 RTW 时间相关的因素。

结果

共纳入 269 名在精神病诊所或医疗康复机构接受住院治疗的参与者。来自两种治疗环境的参与者(n=252,94%)几乎都报告了首次和完全 RTW。来自医疗康复的参与者首次和完全 RTW 的时间最短(中位数分别为 6 天),而来自精神科治疗的参与者时间较长(首次 RTW 的中位数为 17 天,完全 RTW 的中位数为 73 天)。虽然仅健康相关和个人因素与首次 RTW 时间相关,但领导素质和个体 RTW 支持需求与完全 RTW 时间相关。

结论

在临床实践中更多地关注 RTW 的工作适应需求,并与工作场所的关键 RTW 利益相关者合作开展协调行动以支持及时 RTW。DRKS00010903 号临床注册,回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd67/8858919/f7172b9e004b/10926_2021_9985_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd67/8858919/e762043de941/10926_2021_9985_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd67/8858919/f7172b9e004b/10926_2021_9985_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd67/8858919/e762043de941/10926_2021_9985_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd67/8858919/f7172b9e004b/10926_2021_9985_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Employees Receiving Inpatient Treatment for Common Mental Disorders in Germany: Factors Associated with Time to First and Full Return to Work.德国接受常见精神障碍住院治疗的员工:与首次和完全重返工作岗位时间相关的因素。
J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Mar;32(1):114-127. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-09985-4. Epub 2021 May 29.
2
Returning to work after sickness absence due to common mental disorders: study design and baseline findings from an 18 months mixed methods follow-up study in Germany.因常见精神障碍而缺勤后重返工作岗位:德国一项为期 18 个月的混合方法随访研究的设计和基线结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;19(1):1653. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7999-z.
3
Are psychosocial work factors and work-home interference associated with time to first full return-to-work after sick leave due to common mental disorders?工作场所心理社会因素和工作-家庭干扰与因常见精神障碍而休病假后的首次全复工时间有关吗?
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023 Jul;96(5):747-755. doi: 10.1007/s00420-023-01970-z. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
4
Developing a collaborative and sustainable return to work program for employees with common mental disorders: a participatory research with public and private organizations.为患有常见精神障碍的员工制定协作和可持续的重返工作方案:与公共和私营组织共同开展的参与式研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(18):5199-5211. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1931481. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
5
Return-to-work-experts for inpatient treatment of patients with mental illnesses- a proof-of-concept-study (RETURN): the study protocol.精神疾病住院患者重返工作专家 - 概念验证研究(RETURN):研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02504-4.
6
Effectiveness of a blended web-based intervention on return to work for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于网络的综合干预措施对患有常见精神障碍的病假员工重返工作岗位的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 13;17(5):e116. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4097.
7
Stakeholders' Role and Actions in the Return-to-Work Process of Workers on Sick-Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review.利益相关者在常见心理障碍导致的病假员工重返工作岗位过程中的角色和行动:范围综述。
J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Sep;30(3):381-419. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09861-2.
8
Predictors of return to work among patients in treatment for common mental disorders: a pre-post study.常见精神障碍患者治疗后恢复工作的预测因素:一项前后对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4581-4.
9
Evaluating a multimodal, clinical and work-directed intervention (RTW-PIA) to support sustainable return to work among employees with mental disorders: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.评估一种多模式、临床和工作导向的干预措施(RTW-PIA),以支持患有精神障碍的员工可持续返回工作岗位:一项多中心、随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 30;23(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04753-5.
10
Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol.比较两种针对病假员工的跨学科职业康复计划:一项混合方法设计研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 9;22(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-03994-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Work Ability during the Return to Work Process: Results from a Mixed Methods Follow-Up Study Among Employees with Common Mental Disorders.重返工作岗位过程中的工作能力:对患有常见精神障碍员工的混合方法随访研究结果
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Feb 6. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10262-3.
2
Return to Work Trajectories of Swedish Employees on Sick-Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders.因常见精神障碍而休病假的瑞典员工的重返工作轨迹
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Jun 22. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10216-9.
3
Navigating work and life- a qualitative exploration of managers' and employees' views of return-to-work after sick leave due to common mental disorders.

本文引用的文献

1
[Patients' Work-Related Participation Impairments and Need for Support in Day Hospital and Inpatient Psychiatric Treatment].[日间医院和住院精神科治疗中患者与工作相关的参与障碍及支持需求]
Psychiatr Prax. 2020 Jul;47(5):235-241. doi: 10.1055/a-1112-5519. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
2
Returning to work after sickness absence due to common mental disorders: study design and baseline findings from an 18 months mixed methods follow-up study in Germany.因常见精神障碍而缺勤后重返工作岗位:德国一项为期 18 个月的混合方法随访研究的设计和基线结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;19(1):1653. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7999-z.
3
Stakeholders' Role and Actions in the Return-to-Work Process of Workers on Sick-Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review.
兼顾工作与生活——对管理人员和员工关于因常见精神障碍病假后重返工作岗位看法的定性探索
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17765-x.
4
Predictors of time until return to work and duration of sickness absence in sick-listed precarious workers with common mental disorders: a secondary data-analysis of two trials and one cohort study.患有常见精神障碍的不稳定就业病假员工恢复工作时间及病假时长的预测因素:两项试验和一项队列研究的二次数据分析
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2023 Dec 8;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13033-023-00613-7.
5
The cost-utility of a return-to-work intervention in comparison to routine care for patients with mental disorders in Germany: Results from the RETURN project.德国精神障碍患者重返工作岗位干预措施与常规护理的成本-效用比较:RETURN 项目的结果。
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 24;66(1):e55. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2427.
6
Evaluating a multimodal, clinical and work-directed intervention (RTW-PIA) to support sustainable return to work among employees with mental disorders: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.评估一种多模式、临床和工作导向的干预措施(RTW-PIA),以支持患有精神障碍的员工可持续返回工作岗位:一项多中心、随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 30;23(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04753-5.
7
Are psychosocial work factors and work-home interference associated with time to first full return-to-work after sick leave due to common mental disorders?工作场所心理社会因素和工作-家庭干扰与因常见精神障碍而休病假后的首次全复工时间有关吗?
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023 Jul;96(5):747-755. doi: 10.1007/s00420-023-01970-z. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
利益相关者在常见心理障碍导致的病假员工重返工作岗位过程中的角色和行动:范围综述。
J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Sep;30(3):381-419. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09861-2.
4
Global Burden of Disease and the Impact of Mental and Addictive Disorders.全球疾病负担与精神和成瘾性障碍的影响
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Feb 7;21(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-0997-0.
5
The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review.社会支持和社会融合因素对工伤后重返工作岗位结果的影响:系统评价。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Sep;29(3):636-659. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-09826-x.
6
[Who Benefits in Graded Return to Work on Behalf of the German Pension Insurance? Results of a Cohort Study].[德国养老保险的分级返岗谁能受益?一项队列研究的结果]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2019 Jun;58(3):163-171. doi: 10.1055/a-0618-0118. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
7
Intervention policies and social security in case of reduced working capacity in the Netherlands, Finland and Germany: a comparative analysis.荷兰、芬兰和德国减少劳动能力情况下的干预政策和社会保障:比较分析。
Int J Public Health. 2018 Dec;63(9):1081-1088. doi: 10.1007/s00038-018-1133-3. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
8
Choosing the appropriate treatment setting: which information and decision-making needs do adult inpatients with mental disorders have? A qualitative interview study.选择合适的治疗环境:患有精神障碍的成年住院患者有哪些信息需求和决策需求?一项定性访谈研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 May 15;12:823-833. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S164160. eCollection 2018.
9
[Work-Related Medical Rehabilitation in Cancer Rehabilitation - Short-Term Results from a Cluster-Randomized Multicenter-Trial].[癌症康复中的工作相关医学康复——一项整群随机多中心试验的短期结果]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2019 Jun;58(3):181-190. doi: 10.1055/a-0604-0157. Epub 2018 May 25.
10
Person-related factors associated with work participation in employees with health problems: a systematic review.与健康问题员工工作参与相关的人员相关因素:系统评价。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018 Jul;91(5):497-512. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1308-5. Epub 2018 Apr 26.