• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

IVIM-DKI 用于鉴别前列腺癌和前列腺增生:1.5T 与 3T MRI 对比研究。

IVIM-DKI for differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3 T MRI.

机构信息

Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.

Department of Radio-Diagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

MAGMA. 2022 Aug;35(4):609-620. doi: 10.1007/s10334-021-00932-1. Epub 2021 May 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10334-021-00932-1
PMID:34052899
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To implement an advanced spatial penalty-based reconstruction to constrain the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) model and investigate whether it provides a suitable alternative at 1.5 T to the traditional IVIM-DKI model at 3 T for clinical characterization of prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with biopsy-proven PCa were recruited for MRI examination (n = 16 scanned at 1.5 T, n = 16 scanned at 3 T). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with 13 b values (b = 0 to 2000 s/mm up to 3 averages, 1.5 T: TR = 5.774 s, TE = 81 ms and 3 T: TR = 4.899 s, TE = 100 ms), T2-weighted, and T1-weighted imaging were used on the 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scanner, respectively. The IVIM-DKI signal was modeled using the traditional IVIM-DKI model and a novel model in which the total variation (TV) penalty function was combined with the traditional model to optimize non-physiological variations. Paired and unpaired t-tests were used to compare intra-scanner and scanner group differences in IVIM-DKI parameters obtained using the novel and the traditional models. Analysis of variance with post hoc test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to assess the ability of parameters obtained using the novel model (at 1.5 T) and the traditional model (at 3 T) to characterize prostate lesions.

RESULTS

IVIM-DKI modeled using novel model with TV spatial penalty function at 1.5 T, produced parameter maps with 50-78% lower coefficient of variation (CV) than traditional model at 3 T. Novel model estimated higher D with lower D*, f and k values at both field strengths compared to traditional model. For scanner differences, the novel model at 1.5 T estimated lower D* and f values as compared to traditional model at 3 T. At 1.5 T, D and f values were significantly lower with k values significantly higher in tumor than BPH and healthy tissue. D (AUC: 0.98), f (AUC: 0.82), and k (AUC: 0.91) parameters estimated using novel model showed high diagnostic performance in cancer lesion detection at 1.5 T.

DISCUSSION

In comparison with the IVIM-DKI model at 3 T, IVIM-DKI signal modeled with the TV penalty function at 1.5 T showed lower estimation errors. The proposed novel model can be utilized for improved detection of prostate lesions.

摘要

目的

采用高级空间惩罚重建来约束体素内不相干运动(IVIM)-扩散峰度成像(DKI)模型,并研究其是否可以在 1.5 T 为临床诊断前列腺癌(PCa)和良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者提供比 3 T 传统 IVIM-DKI 模型更好的替代方案。

材料与方法

招募了 32 名经活检证实患有 PCa 的患者进行 MRI 检查(16 名患者在 1.5 T 进行扫描,16 名患者在 3 T 进行扫描)。使用 13 个 b 值(b=0 至 2000 s/mm ,平均为 3 次,1.5 T:TR=5.774 s,TE=81 ms;3 T:TR=4.899 s,TE=100 ms)的扩散加权成像(DWI)、T2 加权成像和 T1 加权成像,分别在 1.5 T 和 3 T MRI 扫描仪上进行。通过传统 IVIM-DKI 模型和将总变差(TV)惩罚函数与传统模型相结合的新模型来对 IVIM-DKI 信号进行建模,以优化非生理变化。采用配对和非配对 t 检验比较了新模型和传统模型在 1.5 T 和 3 T 扫描仪上获得的 IVIM-DKI 参数的组内和组间差异。采用方差分析和事后检验以及受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来评估新模型(在 1.5 T 下)和传统模型(在 3 T 下)获得的参数在诊断前列腺病变中的能力。

结果

与 3 T 传统 IVIM-DKI 模型相比,采用 TV 空间惩罚函数的新模型在 1.5 T 下生成的参数图的变异系数(CV)降低了 50%-78%。与传统模型相比,新模型在两种场强下均估计出更高的 D 值,更低的 D*、f 和 k 值。对于扫描仪之间的差异,与 3 T 传统模型相比,1.5 T 新模型估计的 D*和 f 值更低。在 1.5 T 下,肿瘤中的 D 值和 f 值明显低于 BPH 和健康组织,而 k 值明显更高。在 1.5 T 下,新模型估计的 D(AUC:0.98)、f(AUC:0.82)和 k(AUC:0.91)参数在癌症病变检测中具有较高的诊断性能。

讨论

与 3 T 传统 IVIM-DKI 模型相比,在 1.5 T 下采用 TV 惩罚函数的 IVIM-DKI 信号的估计误差较低。所提出的新模型可用于提高前列腺病变的检测能力。

相似文献

1
IVIM-DKI for differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3 T MRI.IVIM-DKI 用于鉴别前列腺癌和前列腺增生:1.5T 与 3T MRI 对比研究。
MAGMA. 2022 Aug;35(4):609-620. doi: 10.1007/s10334-021-00932-1. Epub 2021 May 29.
2
Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging and their machine-learning-based texture analysis for detection and assessment of prostate cancer severity at 3 T.体素内不相干运动和扩散峰度成像及其基于机器学习的纹理分析在 3T 下用于前列腺癌严重程度的检测和评估。
NMR Biomed. 2024 Sep;37(9):e5144. doi: 10.1002/nbm.5144. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
3
Differentiation of prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparisons of the histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion and monoexponential model with in-bore MR-guided biopsy as pathological reference.前列腺癌与前列腺增生的鉴别诊断:磁共振引导下腔内活检病理对照的体素内不相干运动直方图分析与单指数模型的比较。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Oct;45(10):3265-3277. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02227-5.
4
Correlation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging Models With Reactive Stromal Grade in Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌中体素内不相干运动和扩散峰度磁共振成像模型与反应性基质分级的相关性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Aug;58(2):630-639. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28546. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
5
Pancreatic Mass Characterization Using IVIM-DKI MRI and Machine Learning-Based Multi-Parametric Texture Analysis.使用体素内不相干运动扩散峰度成像磁共振成像(IVIM-DKI MRI)和基于机器学习的多参数纹理分析对胰腺肿块进行特征描述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jan 8;10(1):83. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010083.
6
Comparative Study of Monoexponential, Intravoxel Incoherent Motion, Kurtosis, and IVIM-Kurtosis Models for the Diagnosis and Aggressiveness Assessment of Prostate Cancer.单指数模型、体素内不相干运动模型、峰度模型及体素内不相干运动-峰度模型在前列腺癌诊断及侵袭性评估中的对比研究
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 11;10:1763. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01763. eCollection 2020.
7
Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology.前列腺癌侵袭性预测:在 3.0T 扫描仪上,与 ADC 相比,体素内不相干运动(IVIM)成像和扩散峰度成像(DKI)在最终病理的格里森评分方面具有优越的诊断性能。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Oct;44(10):3441-3452. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02075-3.
8
Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MR and diffusion kurtosis imaging for discriminating atypical bone metastasis from benign bone lesion.体素内不相干运动扩散磁共振成像和扩散峰度成像用于鉴别非典型骨转移与良性骨病变。
Br J Radiol. 2019 Aug;92(1100):20190119. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190119. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
Differential value of diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion in benign and malignant solitary pulmonary lesions.扩散峰度成像和体素内不相干运动在良恶性孤立性肺病变中的鉴别价值。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 12;12:1075072. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1075072. eCollection 2022.
10
The diagnostic accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging in the differentiation of malignant and benign soft-tissue masses: which is better?磁共振体素内不相干运动和扩散峰度成像诊断良恶性软组织肿块的准确性:哪个更好?
Acta Radiol. 2022 Jun;63(6):785-793. doi: 10.1177/02841851211017511. Epub 2021 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of diagnostic performance between diffusion models parameters and mono-exponential apparent diffusion coefficient in patients with prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.前列腺癌患者中扩散模型参数与单指数表观扩散系数诊断性能的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Res Med Sci. 2024 Jul 30;29:43. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_359_23. eCollection 2024.
2
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: A review of current technology.前列腺癌的定量磁共振成像:当前技术综述
World J Radiol. 2024 Oct 28;16(10):497-511. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i10.497.
3
Trends in brain MRI and CP association using deep learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Renal artery assessment with non-enhanced MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography: comparison between 1.5 and 3.0 T.1.5T 与 3.0T 磁共振血管成像与数字减影血管造影在肾动脉评估中的对比。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1747-1754. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06440-0. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
基于深度学习的脑 MRI 与 CP 关联的趋势研究。
Radiol Med. 2024 Nov;129(11):1667-1681. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01893-w. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
4
Reproducibility of spatial penalty-based methodologies for intravoxel incoherent motion analysis with diffusion MRI.基于体素内不相干运动分析的扩散 MRI 空间惩罚方法的可重复性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 1;14(1):22811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71173-0.
5
Added value of histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging for the evaluation of complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.体素内不相干运动直方图分析和扩散峰度成像在评估局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗完全缓解中的附加价值
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar;35(3):1669-1678. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11081-z. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
6
Precise Prostate Cancer Assessment Using IVIM-Based Parametric Estimation of Blood Diffusion from DW-MRI.基于扩散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)的体素内不相干运动(IVIM)参数估计对前列腺癌进行精准评估
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;11(6):629. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11060629.
7
Comparison of the monoexponential and biexponential models of diffusion-weighted magnetic imaging in grading clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a case-control study.扩散加权磁共振成像单指数模型与双指数模型在透明细胞肾细胞癌分级中的比较:一项病例对照研究
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 May 31;13(5):792-801. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-141. Epub 2024 May 28.
8
Probing Renal Microstructure and Function with Advanced Diffusion MRI: Concepts, Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.利用高级扩散 MRI 探测肾脏微观结构和功能:概念、应用、挑战和未来方向。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Oct;60(4):1259-1277. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29127. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
9
Pancreatic Mass Characterization Using IVIM-DKI MRI and Machine Learning-Based Multi-Parametric Texture Analysis.使用体素内不相干运动扩散峰度成像磁共振成像(IVIM-DKI MRI)和基于机器学习的多参数纹理分析对胰腺肿块进行特征描述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jan 8;10(1):83. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010083.
10
Emerging MR methods for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer by multiparametric MRI.新兴的磁共振方法通过多参数 MRI 提高前列腺癌的诊断准确性。
MAGMA. 2022 Aug;35(4):587-608. doi: 10.1007/s10334-022-01031-5. Epub 2022 Jul 22.