• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ADA 糖尿病风险测试在印度尼西亚成年人群中的适应性:它能否替代随机血糖筛查测试?

ADA Diabetes Risk Test Adaptation in Indonesian Adult Populations: Can It Replace Random Blood Glucose Screening Test?

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Central Jakarta, Indonesia.

Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211021015. doi: 10.1177/21501327211021015.

DOI:10.1177/21501327211021015
PMID:34053367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8165819/
Abstract

AIMS

The use of non-invasive and easily available assessment tools such as the ADA diabetes risk test is recommended for diabetes screening among general population. This study aims to assess the validity of the ADA diabetes risk test in screening for screening hyperglycemia in Indonesian population.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study conducted at primary health care in Cibeber sub district at Cilegon city, Banten province, Indonesia. Subjects were aged ≥45 years old without a prior diagnosis of diabetes were recruited consecutively. The risk of hyperglycemia was measured using the ADA Diabetes Risk Test. Random capillary blood glucose (RcBG) with a cut-off value >140 mg/dL used as a comparison.

RESULTS

From a total of 134 subjects, 23.13% of subjects (n = 31) had hyperglycemia. The ADA Diabetes Risk Test gave an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.60-0.81) with an optimal cut-off of value ≥5. The sensitivity of the ADA diabetes risk test in diagnosing hyperglycemia was 68% with a false-negative rate (FNR) of 32.26%. Meanwhile, at a cut-off value ≥4, the sensitivity of the ADA Diabetes Risk Test was 93% with an FNR of 9.7%.

CONCLUSION

ADA diabetes risk test provides a valuable result as a diabetes screening tool in the Indonesian population, thus promotes intervention strategies for population known to be at risk.

摘要

目的

建议使用非侵入性和易于获得的评估工具,如 ADA 糖尿病风险测试,对一般人群进行糖尿病筛查。本研究旨在评估 ADA 糖尿病风险测试在印度尼西亚人群中筛查筛查性高血糖的有效性。

方法

这是一项在印度尼西亚万丹省西勒贡市 Cibeber 分区的基层医疗保健机构进行的横断面研究。连续招募年龄≥45 岁且无糖尿病既往诊断的受试者。使用 ADA 糖尿病风险测试测量发生高血糖的风险。随机毛细血管血糖(RcBG)的截断值>140mg/dL 用作比较。

结果

在总共 134 名受试者中,有 23.13%的受试者(n=31)患有高血糖症。ADA 糖尿病风险测试的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.71(95%CI:0.60-0.81),最佳截断值≥5。ADA 糖尿病风险测试诊断高血糖的敏感性为 68%,假阴性率(FNR)为 32.26%。同时,在截断值≥4 时,ADA 糖尿病风险测试的敏感性为 93%,假阴性率为 9.7%。

结论

ADA 糖尿病风险测试为印度尼西亚人群提供了有价值的糖尿病筛查工具结果,从而促进了针对已知高危人群的干预策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/8165819/5e153044db8f/10.1177_21501327211021015-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/8165819/1823892aa95e/10.1177_21501327211021015-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/8165819/5e153044db8f/10.1177_21501327211021015-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/8165819/1823892aa95e/10.1177_21501327211021015-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0126/8165819/5e153044db8f/10.1177_21501327211021015-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
ADA Diabetes Risk Test Adaptation in Indonesian Adult Populations: Can It Replace Random Blood Glucose Screening Test?ADA 糖尿病风险测试在印度尼西亚成年人群中的适应性:它能否替代随机血糖筛查测试?
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211021015. doi: 10.1177/21501327211021015.
2
Optimal cut-off points of fasting plasma glucose for two-step strategy in estimating prevalence and screening undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes in Harbin, China.在中国哈尔滨采用两步法策略估算未诊断糖尿病和糖尿病前期患病率及进行筛查时,空腹血糖的最佳切点
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0119510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119510. eCollection 2015.
3
Random capillary whole blood glucose test as a screening test for diabetes mellitus in a middle-aged population.随机毛细血管全血葡萄糖检测作为中年人群糖尿病筛查试验
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1995 Feb;55(1):3-8. doi: 10.3109/00365519509075372.
4
Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in the elderly of Namwon County, South Korea.韩国南原郡老年人糖尿病患病率
Korean J Intern Med. 2002 Sep;17(3):180-90. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2002.17.3.180.
5
Diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in relation to pregnancy outcome.妊娠期糖尿病与妊娠结局相关的诊断标准。
J Diabetes Complications. 2003 May-Jun;17(3):115-9. doi: 10.1016/s1056-8727(02)00173-3.
6
Choosing the most appropriate existing type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool for use in the Philippines: a case-control study with an urban Filipino population.选择最适合在菲律宾使用的现有 2 型糖尿病风险评估工具:一项针对菲律宾城市居民的病例对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 27;19(1):1169. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7402-0.
7
Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate glucose abnormalities in obese patients based on ADA (1997) and WHO (1985) criteria.基于美国糖尿病协会(1997年)和世界卫生组织(1985年)的标准对肥胖患者的糖尿病及中间型血糖异常进行诊断。
Diabet Med. 2002 Apr;19(4):292-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00647.x.
8
Prevalence and predictors of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in Indonesia.印度尼西亚未诊断糖尿病的患病率及预测因素
Acta Med Indones. 2010 Oct;42(4):216-23.
9
Performance indicators and validity of serum fructosamine assay as a diagnostic test in a screening program for diabetes mellitus.血清果糖胺检测作为糖尿病筛查项目诊断试验的性能指标及有效性
Saudi Med J. 2003 May;24(5):477-84.
10
Performance of recommended screening tests for undiagnosed diabetes and dysglycemia.未诊断糖尿病和血糖异常的推荐筛查试验的性能。
Diabetes Care. 2001 Nov;24(11):1899-903. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.11.1899.

引用本文的文献

1
Ecological assessment of extreme temperature and fine particulate matter (pm2.5) impact on diabetes service and outcomes in Thailand.泰国极端温度和细颗粒物(PM2.5)对糖尿病服务及治疗结果影响的生态评估
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 15;25(1):2786. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24003-5.
2
Incidence and predictors of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a population-based cohort study in Abu Dhabi.在阿布扎比一项基于人群的队列研究中2型糖尿病的发病率及预测因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07631-0.
3
Translation and Validation of American Diabetes Association Diabetes Risk Test: The Malay Version.

本文引用的文献

1
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断: 。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S14-S31. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S002.
2
Choosing the most appropriate existing type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool for use in the Philippines: a case-control study with an urban Filipino population.选择最适合在菲律宾使用的现有 2 型糖尿病风险评估工具:一项针对菲律宾城市居民的病例对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 27;19(1):1169. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7402-0.
3
Random plasma glucose predicts the diagnosis of diabetes.随机血浆葡萄糖可预测糖尿病的诊断。
美国糖尿病协会糖尿病风险测试的翻译与验证:马来语版本
Malays J Med Sci. 2022 Feb;29(1):113-125. doi: 10.21315/mjms2022.29.1.11. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 19;14(7):e0219964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219964. eCollection 2019.
4
Validation of the diabetes screening tools proposed by the American Diabetes Association in an aging Chinese population.美国糖尿病协会提出的糖尿病筛查工具在中国老年人群中的验证。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184840. eCollection 2017.
5
Diabetes 2030: Insights from Yesterday, Today, and Future Trends.《2030年糖尿病:从过去、现在到未来趋势的洞察》
Popul Health Manag. 2017 Feb;20(1):6-12. doi: 10.1089/pop.2015.0181. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
6
Mechanisms of diabetic complications.糖尿病并发症的发病机制。
Physiol Rev. 2013 Jan;93(1):137-88. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2011.
7
Prevalence and predictors of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in Indonesia.印度尼西亚未诊断糖尿病的患病率及预测因素
Acta Med Indones. 2010 Oct;42(4):216-23.
8
Ethnic differences in body composition and the associated metabolic profile: a comparative study between Asians and Caucasians.体质组成和相关代谢特征的种族差异:亚洲人与高加索人之间的比较研究。
Maturitas. 2010 Apr;65(4):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.12.012. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
9
Development and validation of a patient self-assessment score for diabetes risk.糖尿病风险患者自我评估分数的开发与验证
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 1;151(11):775-83. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00005.
10
Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.糖尿病的诊断与分类
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S62-7. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S062.