Suppr超能文献

随机毛细血管全血葡萄糖检测作为中年人群糖尿病筛查试验

Random capillary whole blood glucose test as a screening test for diabetes mellitus in a middle-aged population.

作者信息

Qiao Q, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Rajala U, Uusimäki A, Kivelä S L

机构信息

Department of Public Health Science and General Practice, University of Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1995 Feb;55(1):3-8. doi: 10.3109/00365519509075372.

Abstract

This study was aimed at assessing the adequacy of a random capillary whole blood glucose (RCBG) test as a screening test for diabetes mellitus in a middle-aged (55-year-old) Finnish population. Both the screening test (RCBG) and a standard 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were performed on all the participants according to the WHO criteria. The prevalence based on the 2-h OGTTs was 8.5% (11.7% for men and 6.0% for women). The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the screening test for diabetes and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were studied. The likelihood ratios for diabetes within the test categories were also calculated. When a cut-off point of 6.2 mmol l-1 was used, which proved to be the most appropriate in the present study, the specificity was 92% and the sensitivity 63% (79% for men and 40% for women). The men had much higher sensitivities than the women at all cut-off points, but the specificities were comparable. The present study indicated that the RCBG test could be used as a screening test in a subpopulation with a high prevalence of diabetes and severe hyperglycaemia, but it would be quite insensitive in a subpopulation with a considerable overlap of RCBG values between the diabetic group and the non-diabetic one. It would be inappropriate to use the RCBG test as a routine screening test for diabetes in a general population, particularly among subjects with a known low prevalence of diabetes.

摘要

本研究旨在评估随机毛细血管全血葡萄糖(RCBG)检测作为芬兰中年(55岁)人群糖尿病筛查检测的适用性。根据世界卫生组织标准,对所有参与者同时进行了筛查检测(RCBG)和标准的2小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。基于2小时OGTT的患病率为8.5%(男性为11.7%,女性为6.0%)。研究了糖尿病筛查检测的敏感性、特异性、预测值以及受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。还计算了检测类别中糖尿病的似然比。当使用6.2 mmol l-1的截断点时(在本研究中证明是最合适的),特异性为92%,敏感性为63%(男性为79%,女性为40%)。在所有截断点,男性的敏感性均远高于女性,但特异性相当。本研究表明,RCBG检测可用于糖尿病和严重高血糖患病率较高的亚人群的筛查检测,但在糖尿病组和非糖尿病组RCBG值有相当程度重叠的亚人群中,其敏感性会相当低。在普通人群中,尤其是已知糖尿病患病率较低的人群中,将RCBG检测用作糖尿病的常规筛查检测是不合适的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验