Masoumian Samira, Ashouri Ahmad, Ghomian Soheila, Keshtkar Mahbobeh, Siahkamary Esfandiar, Vahed Neda
Mental Health Research, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Clinical Psychology, University of Tehran Counseling Center, Tehran, Iran.
Iran J Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;16(1):21-29. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v16i1.5374.
The aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) compared to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) on anger and interpersonal relationships among male students. In the present study, several universities were selected from the public universities in Tehran province, based on random cluster sampling. Then, 400 students from selected universities were selected randomly and Aggression Questionnaire (AGQ) was administered on them. After collecting information, among the participants who gained scores higher than the average, 30 were selected based on the lottery and randomly (sorting their names in alphabetical order and randomly selecting them) and then were placed randomly in ACT (n = 15) and CBT (n = 15) groups. Also, the Fundamental Interpersonal Relation Orientation- Behavior (FIRO-B) and Aggression Questionnaire (AGQ) was performed on both groups before and after intervention. The results indicated that at the end of treatment, there was a significant decrease in the degree of anger among the participants and a significant improvement in all subscales of interpersonal relationships. Also, a significant difference was found between the 2 groups of ACT and CBT in terms of anger changes. Considering that the anger changes in the ACT group were higher, it can be concluded that the ACT group had more changes than the CBT group, but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups of ACT and CBT in terms of FIRO-B subscales. In some cases, such as anger, ACT has a better effect than CBT, and in others, such as interpersonal problems, it is as effective as CBT.
本研究的目的是确定接受与承诺疗法（ACT）与认知行为疗法（CBT）相比，对男学生愤怒情绪和人际关系的疗效。在本研究中，基于随机整群抽样从德黑兰省的公立大学中选取了几所大学。然后，从所选大学中随机选取400名学生，并对他们进行攻击性问卷（AGQ）测试。收集信息后，在得分高于平均分的参与者中，通过抽签随机选取30人（按字母顺序排列他们的名字并随机选择），然后将他们随机分为ACT组（n = 15）和CBT组（n = 15）。此外，在干预前后对两组都进行了基本人际关系取向行为量表（FIRO - B）和攻击性问卷（AGQ）测试。结果表明，在治疗结束时，参与者的愤怒程度显著降低，人际关系的所有子量表都有显著改善。此外，ACT组和CBT组在愤怒情绪变化方面存在显著差异。鉴于ACT组的愤怒情绪变化更大，可以得出结论，ACT组比CBT组有更多变化，但ACT组和CBT组在FIRO - B子量表方面没有显著差异。在某些情况下，如愤怒情绪方面，ACT比CBT效果更好，而在其他情况下，如人际关系问题方面，ACT与CBT效果相当。
