Galovski Tara E, Blanchard Edward B
Center for Stress and Anxiety Disorders, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12222, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2002 Dec;40(12):1385-402. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00100-0.
This study tested the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral psychological intervention (CBT) targeting aggressive driving behaviors within both a court-referred (N=20) and a self-referred community (N=8) sample as compared to a symptom monitoring (SM) only control condition. Treatment outcome was assessed through the use of daily driving diaries, standard psychological tests, and a global rating of change scale. The CBT treatment condition improved more than the SM condition as assessed through the daily driving diaries. Although the court-referred and self-referred samples showed equivalent improvement on the driving diaries, the self-referred group improved more on measures of general anger. Standardized measures of driving anger, state anxiety and measures of general anger indicated significant change in the expected direction. Aggressive drivers who met criteria for Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED) showed a trend to improve less than non-IED aggressive drivers. Treatment gains were maintained at the 2-month follow-up point.
本研究测试了一种认知行为心理干预（CBT）针对攻击性驾驶行为的效果，该干预在法院转介样本（N = 20）和自我转介社区样本（N = 8）中进行，与仅进行症状监测（SM）的对照条件相比。通过使用每日驾驶日记、标准心理测试和整体变化评定量表来评估治疗结果。通过每日驾驶日记评估，CBT治疗条件比SM条件改善得更多。虽然法院转介样本和自我转介样本在驾驶日记上显示出同等程度的改善，但自我转介组在一般愤怒测量上改善得更多。驾驶愤怒的标准化测量、状态焦虑和一般愤怒测量均表明朝着预期方向有显著变化。符合间歇性爆发障碍（IED）标准的攻击性驾驶员改善程度低于非IED攻击性驾驶员，呈现出一种趋势。治疗效果在2个月的随访点得以维持。
