Gupta Sanjeeva, Gupta Harun, Baranidharan Ganesan, Sharma Manohar
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Br J Pain. 2021 May;15(2):129-133. doi: 10.1177/2049463720960497. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
S1 root block is performed for pain in the lower limbs due to S1 nerve root inflammation at the L5/S1 disc level or compression in the lateral recess. We often note anterior or posterior spread of contrast away from the L5/S1 disc through an anatomically appropriate needle tip placement. We frequently encounter vascular spread when performing S1 root blocks, and the reported incidence varies between 10.4% and 27.8%. There is no clear strategy published to manage these challenges. In such clinical scenarios, we propose a double needle and/or a multilevel needle technique.
A 39-year-old male presented with radicular pain in the left S1 distribution which matched the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan findings and thus he was listed for a left S1 root block. A 22G needle was placed at the S1 level and upon injecting the contrast, vascular spread and anterior and distal spread along the nerve root were noted and the contrast did not reach the site of the pathology, the L5/S1 disc. The contrast continued to spread anteriorly despite withdrawing the needle. A second needle was placed medial and inferior to the first needle and the contrast spread now was adequate, that is, towards the L5/S1 disc and thus the injection was accomplished in a safe and satisfactory manner without needing to reschedule the procedure.
Double needle technique can assist in overcoming problems encountered when performing an S1 root block. The alternatives could be the multilevel technique or to reschedule the procedure or consider a less optimal technique such as a caudal or a lumbar interlaminar epidural. In this technical report, we have highlighted various intervention options to mitigate such challenges and included a flow diagram to assist in decision-making. We have also discussed the possibility of altering the consent to accommodate the changes to the planned procedure.
S1神经根阻滞用于治疗因L5/S1椎间盘水平的S1神经根炎症或侧隐窝受压引起的下肢疼痛。我们经常注意到,通过解剖学上合适的针尖放置,造影剂会从L5/S1椎间盘向前或向后扩散。在进行S1神经根阻滞时,我们经常遇到血管内造影剂扩散的情况,报道的发生率在10.4%至27.8%之间。目前尚未公布应对这些挑战的明确策略。在这种临床情况下,我们提出一种双针和/或多级针技术。
一名39岁男性因左侧S1分布区的神经根性疼痛前来就诊,疼痛情况与磁共振成像(MRI)扫描结果相符,因此他被安排进行左侧S1神经根阻滞。在S1水平放置一根22G的针,注射造影剂时,发现造影剂出现血管内扩散,并沿神经根向前和向远端扩散,造影剂未到达病变部位L5/S1椎间盘。尽管将针拔出,造影剂仍继续向前扩散。在第一根针的内侧和下方放置第二根针,此时造影剂的扩散是充分的,即朝着L5/S1椎间盘扩散,因此注射得以安全、顺利地完成,无需重新安排手术。
双针技术有助于克服在进行S1神经根阻滞时遇到的问题。其他选择可以是多级技术,或者重新安排手术,或者考虑采用不太理想的技术,如骶管或腰椎椎间孔硬膜外阻滞。在本技术报告中,我们强调了各种应对此类挑战的干预选项,并纳入了一个流程图以协助决策。我们还讨论了修改知情同意书以适应计划手术变更的可能性。