• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本痴呆症照料者积极感受量表21项版本(DCPFS - 21)的开发,用于识别对痴呆症患者照料的积极感受。

Development of the Dementia Caregiver Positive Feeling Scale 21-item version (DCPFS-21) in Japan to recognise positive feelings about caregiving for people with dementia.

作者信息

Fuju Taiga, Yamagami Tetsuya, Yamaguchi Haruyasu, Yamazaki Tsuneo

机构信息

Tokyo Centre for Dementia Care Research and Practices, Tokyo, Japan.

Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Psychogeriatrics. 2021 Jul;21(4):650-658. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12727. Epub 2021 May 30.

DOI:10.1111/psyg.12727
PMID:34056808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8362216/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to develop and validate the Dementia Caregiver Positive Feeling Scale 21-item version (DCPFS-21) in Japan.

METHODS

We selected and generated 27 items based on the preliminary 25-item version of the DCPFS. Next, the DCPFS-21 was developed and validated through two phases. In Phase 1, we obtained data from 147 caregivers of people with dementia by using the 27-item version, examined the construct validity and internal consistency of the scale and then selected 21 items (DCPFS-21). In Phase 2, we compared the scores of 30 caregivers of people with dementia on the DCPFS-21 with the standard scales. Four weeks after the first examination, we re-examined the intra-rater reliability.

RESULTS

In Phase 1, via factor analysis, we reduced the 27 items to 21 items (DCPFS-21). Moreover, the DCPFS-21 was grouped into four subscales, namely, meaning in caregiving, caregiving mastery, positive emotion on caregiving and support from others. This classification agreed with the following factors extracted from the pilot study. The DCPFS-21 showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92). In Phase 2, the DCPFS-21 correlated with the Caregiving Gratification Scale by 0.54 (P < 0.01). The DCPFS-21 also showed good intra-rater reliability (1.1: ρ = 0.62).

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated the DCPFS-21, which measures the positive feelings of family caregivers of people with dementia, in Japan.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在开发并验证日本版的21项痴呆症照料者积极感受量表(DCPFS - 21)。

方法

我们基于DCPFS最初的25项版本筛选并生成了27个条目。接下来,DCPFS - 21分两个阶段进行开发和验证。在第一阶段,我们使用27项版本从147名痴呆症患者的照料者那里获取数据,检验该量表的结构效度和内部一致性,然后选出21个条目(DCPFS - 21)。在第二阶段,我们将30名痴呆症患者照料者在DCPFS - 21上的得分与标准量表进行比较。首次检查四周后,我们重新检验了评分者内信度。

结果

在第一阶段,通过因子分析,我们将27个条目缩减至21个条目(DCPFS - 21)。此外,DCPFS - 21被分为四个子量表,即照料的意义、照料技能、照料中的积极情绪和他人的支持。这一分类与前期研究中提取的以下因素相符。DCPFS - 21显示出良好的内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.92)。在第二阶段,DCPFS - 21与照料满足感量表的相关性为0.54(P < 0.01)。DCPFS - 21还显示出良好的评分者内信度(ICC:ρ = 0.62)。

结论

我们在日本开发并验证了DCPFS - 21,该量表用于测量痴呆症患者家庭照料者的积极感受。

相似文献

1
Development of the Dementia Caregiver Positive Feeling Scale 21-item version (DCPFS-21) in Japan to recognise positive feelings about caregiving for people with dementia.日本痴呆症照料者积极感受量表21项版本(DCPFS - 21)的开发,用于识别对痴呆症患者照料的积极感受。
Psychogeriatrics. 2021 Jul;21(4):650-658. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12727. Epub 2021 May 30.
2
Validation of the Benefits of Being a Caregiver Scale (BBCS) - further development of an independent characteristic of informal caregiving.验证照顾者获益量表(BBCS)的有效性 - 进一步发展非正规照护的独立特征。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jan 14;23(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03650-y.
3
Development of the empowerment scale for family caregivers of community-dwelling people with dementia in Japan.日本社区痴呆患者家庭照顾者赋权量表的开发。
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020 Apr;17(2):e12311. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12311. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
4
Developing a social capital scale for family caregivers of people with dementia.开发痴呆患者家庭照顾者的社会资本量表。
Geriatr Nurs. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):740-746. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 May 31.
5
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire. caregiver 自我评估问卷土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3250-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587525. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
6
Exploring the use of the Dementia Management Strategies Scale in caregivers of persons with dementia in Singapore.探讨在新加坡痴呆症患者照顾者中使用痴呆症管理策略量表的情况。
Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(8):935-41. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2013.768209. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
7
A 3-Item Screening Scale for Caregiver Burden in Dementia Caregiving: Scale Development and Score Mapping to the 22-Item Zarit Burden Interview.用于痴呆症照护的 caregiver 负担的 3 项筛查量表:量表开发和与 22 项 Zarit 负担访谈的分数映射。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 May;20(5):629-633.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
8
[Attitudes towards family caregiving of people with dementia among the general public in Japan: scale development and validation].[日本普通公众对痴呆症患者家庭照料的态度:量表的编制与验证]
Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2010;47(4):315-22. doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.47.315.
9
Positive Aspects of Caregiving Questionnaire.照顾问卷的积极方面。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2017 Mar;30(2):77-83. doi: 10.1177/0891988716686831. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
10
Reliability and validation of the Positive Aspects of Caregiving scale among Japanese caregivers of people with dementia.痴呆症患者日本照料者护理积极方面量表的信效度研究
Int J Nurs Sci. 2021 Mar 17;8(2):210-214. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.03.007. eCollection 2021 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining the Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Positive Caregiving Experience Scale in Dementia.确定痴呆症患者积极照护体验量表土耳其语版本的心理测量特性。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;40(3):e70063. doi: 10.1002/gps.70063.
2
Impact of care-recipient relationship type on quality of life in caregivers of older adults with dementia over time.随着时间的推移,护理对象关系类型对老年痴呆症患者照顾者生活质量的影响。
Age Ageing. 2024 Jun 1;53(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae128.
3
Depression among caregivers of patients with dementia: Associative factors and management approaches.痴呆症患者照料者的抑郁:相关因素及管理方法。
World J Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 19;12(1):59-76. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i1.59.
4
A randomized controlled trial of the "positive diary" intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia.一项针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的“积极日记”干预的随机对照试验。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022 Oct;58(4):1949-1958. doi: 10.1111/ppc.13013. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
5
Measuring positive caregiving experiences in caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia.衡量老年痴呆症疗养院居民照料者的积极照料体验。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Nov;21(11):1070-1071. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14280. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of the "positive diary" intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia.一项针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的“积极日记”干预的随机对照试验。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022 Oct;58(4):1949-1958. doi: 10.1111/ppc.13013. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
2
Developing a social capital scale for family caregivers of people with dementia.开发痴呆患者家庭照顾者的社会资本量表。
Geriatr Nurs. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):740-746. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 May 31.
3
Psychological Interventions for Dementia Caregivers: What We Have Achieved, What We Have Learned.痴呆症照护者的心理干预:我们取得了什么成就,我们学到了什么。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Jun 6;21(7):59. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1045-9.
4
Unravelling positive aspects of caregiving in dementia: An integrative review of research literature.解析痴呆症护理中的积极方面:研究文献的综合回顾。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
5
Positive Aspects of Caregiving Questionnaire.照顾问卷的积极方面。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2017 Mar;30(2):77-83. doi: 10.1177/0891988716686831. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
6
Predictors of caregiving satisfaction in informal caregivers of people with dementia.痴呆症患者非正式照料者的照料满意度预测因素
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 May-Jun;60(3):380-8. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
7
Voices of Alzheimer Caregivers on Positive Aspects of Caregiving.阿尔茨海默病照料者对照料积极方面的看法
Gerontologist. 2016 Jun;56(3):451-60. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu118. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
8
Positive appraisal of in-home family caregivers of dementia patients as an influence on the continuation of caregiving.对痴呆症患者家庭照护者的积极评价对持续照护的影响。
Psychogeriatrics. 2015 Mar;15(1):26-31. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12074. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
9
Positive aspects of caregiving (PAC): scale validation among Chinese dementia caregivers (CG).照护的积极方面(PAC):中国痴呆症照护者(CG)中的量表验证
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Mar-Apr;60(2):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.10.019. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
10
Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist.系统评价研究测量特性的方法学质量评估:COSMIN 清单的评分系统。
Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):651-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1. Epub 2011 Jul 6.