• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰痛:YouTube内容在患者教育中扮演着什么角色?

Low back pain: What is the role of YouTube content in patient education?

作者信息

Hornung Alexander L, Rudisill Samuel S, Suleiman Rawan W, Siyaji Zakariah K, Sood Sahil, Siddiqui Shahrukh, Koro Lacin, Mohiuddin Shoeb A, Sayari Arash J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2022 Apr;40(4):901-908. doi: 10.1002/jor.25104. Epub 2021 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1002/jor.25104
PMID:34057762
Abstract

The aim of this study was to characterize the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos related to low back pain (LBP) as well as to identify factors associated with the overall video quality. A review of YouTube was performed using two separate search strings. Video-specific characteristics were analyzed for the first 50 videos of each string. Seventy-seven eligible videos were identified as a result. The mean Journal of the American Medical Association score was 2.25 ± 1.09 (range: 0-4) out of 4. The mean Global Quality Score (GQS) score was 2.29 ± 1.37 (range: 1-4) out of 5. The mean LBP score (LPS) score was 3.83 ± 2.23 (range: 0-11) out of 15. Video power index was a predictor of GQS score (β = 55.78, p = 0.048), whereas the number of likes (β = -2.49, p = 0.047) and view ratio (β = -55.62, p = 0.049) were associated with lower quality scores. Days since initial upload (β = 0.32, p = 0.042) as well as like ratio (β = 0.37, p = 0.019) were independent predictors of higher LPS scores. The results of this study suggest that the overall reliability and educational quality of videos uploaded to YouTube concerning LBP are unsatisfactory. More popular videos demonstrated poorer educational quality than their less popular counterparts. As the prevalence of LBP rises, more accurate and thorough educational videos are necessary to ensure accurate information is available to patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是描述与腰痛(LBP)相关的YouTube视频的教育质量和可靠性,并确定与整体视频质量相关的因素。使用两个独立的搜索字符串对YouTube进行了检索。对每个字符串的前50个视频的特定视频特征进行了分析。结果共识别出77个符合条件的视频。美国医学会杂志平均评分为2.25±1.09(范围:0 - 4,满分4分)。全球质量评分(GQS)平均评分为2.29±1.37(范围:1 - 4,满分5分)。腰痛评分(LPS)平均评分为3.83±2.23(范围:0 - 15,满分15分)。视频影响力指数是GQS评分的一个预测指标(β = 55.78,p = 0.048),而点赞数(β = -2.49,p = 0.047)和观看比例(β = -55.62,p = 0.049)与较低的质量评分相关。自首次上传以来的天数(β = 0.32,p = 0.042)以及点赞比例(β = 0.37,p = 0.019)是较高LPS评分的独立预测指标。本研究结果表明,上传到YouTube上的关于LBP的视频的整体可靠性和教育质量并不理想。更受欢迎的视频相比不太受欢迎的视频展示出较差的教育质量。随着LBP患病率的上升,需要更准确、全面的教育视频,以确保患者能够获得准确的信息。

相似文献

1
Low back pain: What is the role of YouTube content in patient education?腰痛:YouTube内容在患者教育中扮演着什么角色?
J Orthop Res. 2022 Apr;40(4):901-908. doi: 10.1002/jor.25104. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
2
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
3
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
4
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
5
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
6
Evaluating the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on myopia: a video content analysis.评估YouTube上关于近视的视频的质量和可靠性:一项视频内容分析。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 18;44(1):329. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03250-2.
7
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上有关肩袖修复信息的质量和可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
8
YouTube as a source of information on pediatric scoliosis: a reliability and educational quality analysis.YouTube 作为小儿脊柱侧凸信息来源的可靠性和教育质量分析。
Spine Deform. 2023 Jan;11(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00569-7. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
9
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
10
Evaluating the quality, utility, and reliability of the information in uveitis videos shared on YouTube.评估在YouTube上分享的葡萄膜炎视频中信息的质量、实用性和可靠性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02454-8. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Individuals Frequently Search Google With Questions About the Management of Meniscal Tears and the Indications for and Technical Details of Surgery but the Quality of the Information Is Suboptimal.人们经常在谷歌上搜索有关半月板撕裂治疗、手术适应症及技术细节的问题,但信息质量欠佳。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Dec 9;7(2):101061. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101061. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Assessing the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on inflammatory back pain.评估YouTube视频作为炎性背痛信息来源的质量和可靠性。
PeerJ. 2024 Apr 11;12:e17215. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17215. eCollection 2024.
3
YouTube online videos as a source for patient education of cervical spondylosis-a reliability and quality analysis.
YouTube 在线视频作为颈椎病患者教育的一种资源:可靠性和质量分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):1831. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16495-w.
4
Diabetes Mellitus on YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study to Assess the Quality and Reliability of Videos.YouTube上的糖尿病:一项评估视频质量和可靠性的横断面观察性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 18;15(8):e43704. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43704. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Study on the Quality, Relevance, and Comparability of YouTube Videos Expressing Stroke and Its Consequences From Various Sources.来自不同来源的表达中风及其后果的YouTube视频的质量、相关性和可比性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43277. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
From the identification of biopsychosocial risk factors to an increase in pain-related self-efficacy (IDRIS) - The online-based conveyance of an explanatory model for chronic back pain: Study protocol of a cohort multiple randomized controlled trial.从识别生物心理社会风险因素到提高疼痛相关自我效能感(IDRIS)——慢性背痛解释模型的在线传播:一项队列多重随机对照试验的研究方案
Internet Interv. 2022 Oct 27;30:100582. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100582. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
8
Does YouTube Provide Qualified Patient Education Videos About Atrial Fibrillation?YouTube 上是否有关于心房颤动的合格患者教育视频?
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;10:925691. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.925691. eCollection 2022.
9
Evaluation of the Effect of Patient Education and Strengthening Exercise Therapy Using a Mobile Messaging App on Work Productivity in Japanese Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial.使用移动消息应用程序对慢性下腰痛日本患者进行患者教育和强化运动疗法效果的评估:开放标签、随机、平行组试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 16;10(5):e35867. doi: 10.2196/35867.