Center for Diagnostics, Technical University of Denmark, Anker Egelundsvej 1,B.202, DK-2800, Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Institute for Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Richard Petersens Plads, B. 324, DK-2800, Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Prev Vet Med. 2021 Jul;192:105371. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105371. Epub 2021 May 5.
This study investigated the potential effects of management and health related factors on the productivity in the commercial mink production, during 2015-2018. Data were available from the database at Kopenhagen Fur, the national veterinary prescription database, VetStat, and the laboratory database at the Center for Diagnostics, Technological University of Denmark. A cross-sectional study, including 1.464 min. farms grouped into 1.187 epidemiological units, was applied. Data were analyzed in two models with different outcomes representing productivity on the mink farms, namely skin size and economical value (value sum) of the produced skin. The studied risk factors included use of vaccines and antibacterials, herd size, associated feed producer, purchases and sales of live animals, breeding results (litter size after weaning), Aleutian mink disease virus antibody (AMDV status) and stamping out, and laboratory test results. Vaccination against mink enteritis parvovirus and high breeding results were found to have a positive association with both outcomes, skin size and value sum. Both outcomes also varied significantly between farm clusters associated with different feed producers. Significant effects of antibacterial treatment were found, but the results were complex with both positive and negative associations with the outcome variables, depending on season and interactions with feed producer. Positive effects on antibacterial prescription on skin size were observed, except for farms associated with two small feed producers, known to have a variable microbiological feed quality. In farms receiving feed of very high quality, the positive effect of antibacterial prescription was marginal. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mink data has allowed us to assess the impact of feed quality as well as antibacterial prescription on productivity. The results showed a positive quantitative effect of vaccination against mink enteritis parvovirus on skin size and value, with an optimal effect by vaccination of the whole litter. Antibacterial prescription in the growth period, particularly around weaning, was found to have a positive quantitative effect on productivity in some farms, and the results suggest that the effect was associated with the feed quality. Use of antibacterials to counteract negative effects of low feed quality is not in accordance with principles for prudent use of antibacterials.
本研究调查了管理和健康相关因素对商业水貂生产生产力的潜在影响,研究期间为 2015-2018 年。数据来自哥本哈根皮草公司(Kopenhagen Fur)的数据库、国家兽医处方数据库 VetStat 和丹麦技术大学诊断中心的实验室数据库。采用了一项包括 1464 个养殖场的横断面研究,这些养殖场分为 1187 个流行病学单位。采用了两种不同结果的模型来分析数据,这两种结果代表了水貂养殖场的生产力,即皮张面积和产生皮张的经济价值(总值)。研究的风险因素包括疫苗和抗菌药物的使用、畜群规模、相关饲料生产商、活动物的购买和销售、繁殖结果(断奶后窝仔数)、传染性貂肠炎病毒抗体(AMDV 状态)和扑杀,以及实验室检测结果。针对水貂肠炎细小病毒的疫苗接种和高繁殖结果与两种结果(皮张面积和总值)均呈正相关。两种结果在与不同饲料生产商相关的养殖场集群之间也存在显著差异。抗菌药物治疗的效果显著,但结果较为复杂,取决于季节和与饲料生产商的相互作用,对结果变量既有正相关也有负相关。在皮张面积方面,观察到了抗菌药物处方的积极影响,但对于与两个小饲料生产商有关的养殖场,其结果则相反,因为这两个饲料生产商的饲料微生物质量存在差异。在使用高质量饲料的养殖场中,抗菌药物处方的积极影响则较为微弱。结论:利用水貂数据,我们可以评估饲料质量以及抗菌药物处方对生产力的影响。结果表明,针对水貂肠炎细小病毒的疫苗接种对皮张面积和总值有正向的定量影响,对整个窝仔进行疫苗接种效果最佳。在生长阶段,特别是在断奶前后,抗菌药物处方对一些养殖场的生产力有正向的定量影响,结果表明,这种影响与饲料质量有关。使用抗菌药物来抵消低饲料质量的负面影响不符合抗菌药物合理使用的原则。