Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素抑制药物对类风湿关节炎患者的疾病活动无影响:一项回顾性横断面研究。

Angiotensin-Inhibiting Drugs Do Not Impact Disease Activity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Sluijsmans Dorien M C F, Rohrich Daphne C, Popa Calin D, van den Bemt Bart J F

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal nr 3, 6574 NA Ubbergen, The Netherlands.

Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, 6574 NA Ubbergen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 May 5;10(9):1985. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091985.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Besides their proven effectivity in decreasing the risk of cardiovascular events, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) are likely to possess anti-inflammatory properties as well. This study aims to investigate whether the use of ACEi and ARBs additionally lowers disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we used ARBs or ACEi to study RA patients who had at least one DAS28-CRP measurement during a one-year period. A control group of RA patients without ACEi/ARBs was randomly selected. The primary outcome was the difference between the DAS28-CRP scores of ACEi/ARBs users and controls. The secondary outcomes were the differences between administered dosages of csDMARDs and bDMARDs for users and controls, respectively; these were expressed in defined daily dose (DDD). Confounders were included in the multiple regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 584 ACEi/ARBs users and 552 controls were finally examined. Multiple linear regression analyses showed no association between the use of ACEi or ARBs and the DAS28-CRP scores (ACEi factor 1.00, 95% CI 0.94-1.06; ARBs 1.02, 95% CI 0.96-1.09), nor with the dosage of csDMARDs (ACEi 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.07; ARBs 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.10). Furthermore, the use of ACEi was not associated with reduced dosages of bDMARDs (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.79-1.64), whereas ARBs users tended to use less bDMARDs (1.46, 95% CI 0.98-2.18, = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the use of either ACEi or ARBs in RA patients had no impact on disease activity as measured by the DAS28-CRP. A trend towards lower bDMARD dosages was observed in ARBs users, but the significance of this finding is still unclear.

摘要

目的

除了已证实的降低心血管事件风险的作用外,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)和血管紧张素II 1型受体阻滞剂(ARBs)可能还具有抗炎特性。本研究旨在调查使用ACEi和ARBs是否能额外降低类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疾病活动度。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,我们使用ARBs或ACEi对在一年期间至少有一次DAS28-CRP测量值的RA患者进行研究。随机选择一组未使用ACEi/ARBs的RA患者作为对照组。主要结局是使用ACEi/ARBs的患者与对照组的DAS28-CRP评分之间的差异。次要结局分别是使用者与对照组使用传统合成改善病情抗风湿药(csDMARDs)和生物制剂改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARDs)的剂量差异;这些以限定日剂量(DDD)表示。混杂因素纳入多元回归分析。

结果

最终共检查了584名使用ACEi/ARBs的患者和552名对照组患者。多元线性回归分析显示,使用ACEi或ARBs与DAS28-CRP评分之间无关联(ACEi系数为1.00,95%置信区间为0.94-1.06;ARBs为1.02,95%置信区间为0.96-1.09),与csDMARDs的剂量也无关联(ACEi为0.97,95%置信区间为0.89-1.07;ARBs为0.99,95%置信区间为0.90-1.10)。此外,使用ACEi与bDMARDs剂量减少无关(比值比为1.14,95%置信区间为0.79-1.64),而使用ARBs的患者倾向于使用较少的bDMARDs(1.46,95%置信区间为0.98-2.18,P = 0.06)。

结论

在本研究中,RA患者使用ACEi或ARBs对DAS28-CRP所测量的疾病活动度没有影响。在使用ARBs的患者中观察到bDMARDs剂量有降低趋势,但这一发现的意义仍不明确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9449/8124323/655d74efae13/jcm-10-01985-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验