Leni Davide, Seminati Davide, Fior Davide, Vacirca Francesco, Capitoli Giulia, Cazzaniga Laura, Di Bella Camillo, L'Imperio Vincenzo, Galimberti Stefania, Pagni Fabio
Department of Radiology, ASST Monza, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Department of Pathology, University of Milan-Bicocca (UNIMIB), 20900 Monza, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 6;13(9):2230. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092230.
Ultrasound scores are used to determine whether thyroid nodules should undergo Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) or simple clinical follow-up. Different scores have been proposed for this task, with the American College of Radiology (ACR) TIRADS system being one of the most widely used. This study evaluates its ability in triaging thyroid nodules deserving FNA on a large prospective monocentric Italian case series of 493 thyroid nodules from 448 subjects. In ACR 1-2, cytology never prompted a surgical indication. In 59% of cases classified as TIR1c-TIR2, the FNA procedure could be ancillary, according to the ACR-TIRADS score. A subset (37.9%) of cases classified as TIR4-5 would not undergo FNA, according to the dimensional thresholds used by the ACR-TIRADS. Applying the ACR score, a total of 46.5% thyroid nodules should be studied with FNA. The ACR system demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 58.9% and 59% in the identification of patients with cytology ≥TIR3A, with a particularly high false negative rate for ACR classes ≥3 (44.8%, 43/96), which would dramatically decrease (7.3%, 7/96) if the dimensional criteria were not taken into account. In ACR 3-4-5, a correspondence with the follow-up occurred in 60.3%, 50.2% and 51.9% of cases. The ACR-TIRADS is a useful risk stratification tool for thyroid nodules, although the current dimensional thresholds could lead to an underestimation of malignant lesions. Their update might be considered in future studies to increase the screening performances of the system.
超声评分用于确定甲状腺结节是否应接受细针穿刺活检(FNA)或单纯临床随访。针对此任务已提出了不同的评分系统,美国放射学会(ACR)的甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)是使用最广泛的系统之一。本研究在一个大型前瞻性单中心意大利病例系列中,对来自448名受试者的493个甲状腺结节进行评估,以检验其对需要进行FNA的甲状腺结节进行分类的能力。在ACR 1 - 2类中,细胞学检查从未提示手术指征。根据ACR - TIRADS评分,在59%分类为TIRl c - TIR2的病例中,FNA检查可能是辅助性的。根据ACR - TIRADS使用的尺寸阈值,分类为TIR4 - 5的病例中有一部分(37.9%)不会接受FNA。应用ACR评分,共有46.5%的甲状腺结节应接受FNA检查。ACR系统在识别细胞学检查≥TIR3A的患者时,敏感性和特异性分别为58.9%和59%,对于ACR分类≥3的病例,假阴性率特别高(44.8%,43/96),如果不考虑尺寸标准,该比例将大幅下降(7.3%,7/96)。在ACR 3 - 4 - 5类中,分别有60.3%、50.2%和51.9%的病例与随访结果相符。ACR - TIRADS是一种有用的甲状腺结节风险分层工具,尽管当前的尺寸阈值可能导致对恶性病变的低估。未来研究可能需要考虑对其进行更新,以提高该系统的筛查性能。