Castilla Villanueva Miguel Ángel, Solis Cano Dania Guadalupe, Amador Martínez Ana, Téliz Meneses Marco Antonio, Baquera-Heredia Jesús, Vallin Orozco Cesar Eduardo, Loya Ceballos Mónica
Radiology, Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education, Mexico City, MEX.
Radiology, The American British Cowdray Medical Center, Mexico City, MEX.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 5;16(7):e63918. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63918. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Background Ultrasonographic evaluation of thyroid nodules is challenging due to their high frequency and low malignancy rate. The risk stratification system developed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) focuses on addressing the primary contemporary objectives for these lesions, aiming to decrease unnecessary biopsies while maintaining a similar specificity compared with other risk stratification systems. Generally, when indicative of malignancy by ultrasound findings, the next best step in management is an evaluation by fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and cytological analysis with The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) results that determine further evaluation requirements, actions that are based on the risk of malignancy (ROM) of the assigned category, which could include surgical intervention. Objectives To validate and analyze the individual impact of each ultrasonographic finding indicative of malignancy in the ACR TI-RADS guidelines based on their respective correlation with results obtained by TBSRTC. Materials and method Reports for 212 thyroid ultrasound-guided FNABs from 2018 to 2020 were assessed. Only 117 had both ACR TI-RADS and TBSRTC reports available and were analyzed. Nodules were divided into two groups: ROM < 5% (Bethesda 1, 2; n = 58), and ROM > 5% (Bethesda 3, 4, 5, 6; n = 59). Statistical analysis was performed using the x test and bivariate logistic regression model for each characteristic included in ACR TI-RADS. Results Individual ultrasound characteristics with a more pronounced distribution towards the Bethesda > 5% malignancy group were: solid or almost completely solid composition (n=53, 62.3%), very hypoechoic echogenicity (n=3, 75%), wider-than-tall shape (n=50, 50.5%), lobulated or irregular margin (n=23, 65.7%), punctate echogenic foci (n=18, 72%), and thyroid isthmus location (n=6, 75%). Statistically significant individual ultrasonographic characteristics indicative of malignancy included solid or almost completely solid (p = 0.005), very hypoechoic echogenicity (p = 0.046), margin lobulated or irregular (p = 0.031), and punctate echogenic foci (p = 0.015). No significant association was found in the taller-than-wide shape for differentiating malignant from benign lesions (p = 0.969). Conclusions Specific ultrasound characteristics identified in the ACR TI-RADS system demonstrate a stronger correlation with an increased risk of malignancy when compared with cytologic evaluation results. These characteristics include a solid composition, lobulated or irregular margins, punctate echogenic foci, and very hypoechoic echogenicity. Our findings revealed that the scale points for the taller-than-wide characteristic do not adequately represent its true influence on the risk of malignancy.
背景 由于甲状腺结节的高发性和低恶性率,对其进行超声评估具有挑战性。美国放射学会(ACR)的甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)所开发的风险分层系统专注于解决这些病变当前的主要目标,旨在减少不必要的活检,同时与其他风险分层系统相比保持相似的特异性。一般来说,当超声检查结果提示恶性时,下一步最佳管理措施是通过细针穿刺活检(FNAB)进行评估,并根据甲状腺细胞病理学报告系统(TBSRTC)的结果进行细胞学分析,该结果决定了进一步的评估要求,这些行动基于所分配类别的恶性风险(ROM),这可能包括手术干预。目的 基于ACR TI-RADS指南中每个提示恶性的超声检查结果与TBSRTC所获结果的各自相关性,验证并分析其个体影响。材料和方法 评估了2018年至2020年212例甲状腺超声引导下FNAB的报告。只有117例同时有ACR TI-RADS和TBSRTC报告并进行了分析。结节分为两组:ROM<5%(贝塞斯达1、2类;n=58)和ROM>5%(贝塞斯达3、4、5、6类;n=59)。对ACR TI-RADS中包含的每个特征使用x检验和二元逻辑回归模型进行统计分析。结果 向贝塞斯达恶性>5%组分布更明显的个体超声特征为:实性或几乎完全实性成分(n=53,62.3%)、极低回声(n=3,75%)、纵横比>1(n=50,50.5%)、分叶状或不规则边缘(n=23,65.7%)、点状强回声灶(n=18,72%)和甲状腺峡部位置(n=6,75%)。提示恶性的具有统计学意义的个体超声特征包括实性或几乎完全实性(p=0.005)、极低回声(p=0.046)、边缘分叶状或不规则(p=0.031)和点状强回声灶(p=0.015)。在纵横比<1用于区分恶性与良性病变方面未发现显著关联(p=0.969)。结论 与细胞学评估结果相比,ACR TI-RADS系统中确定的特定超声特征与恶性风险增加的相关性更强。这些特征包括实性成分、分叶状或不规则边缘、点状强回声灶和极低回声。我们的研究结果表明,纵横比<1这一特征的评分点不能充分代表其对恶性风险的真实影响。