Department of Communication Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business Economics, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 22;18(11):5555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115555.
The measures to fight the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic have been concentrated on inviting people to stay at home. This has reduced opportunities to exercise while also shedding some light on the importance of physical health. Based on an online survey, this paper investigated physical activity behaviours of a Belgians sample ( = 427) during the lockdown period between the end of May 2020 and the beginning of June 2020 and found that, during this period, the gap between sufficiently and insufficiently active individuals widened even more. This paper analysed important moderators of physical activity behaviours, such as barriers and benefits to exercise, digital support used to exercise, and individuals' emotional well-being. Descriptive analysis and analyses of variance indicated that, generally, individuals significantly increased their engagement in exercise, especially light- and moderate-intensity activities, mostly accepted the listed benefits but refused the listed barriers, increased their engagement in digital support and did not score high on any affective measures. A comparison between sufficiently active and insufficiently active individuals during the lockdown showed that the former engaged even more in physical activity, whereas the latter exercised equally (i.e., not enough) or even less compared to before the lockdown. By means of a logistic regression, five key factors of belonging to the sufficiently active group were revealed and discussed. Practical implications for government and policies are reviewed.
抗击 COVID-19 疫情的措施主要集中在邀请人们留在家中。这减少了锻炼的机会,同时也凸显了身体健康的重要性。基于一项在线调查,本文研究了 2020 年 5 月底至 6 月初封锁期间比利时人的身体活动行为(n=427),发现在此期间,足够活跃和不够活跃的个体之间的差距进一步扩大。本文分析了身体活动行为的重要调节因素,如锻炼的障碍和益处、用于锻炼的数字支持以及个体的情绪健康。描述性分析和方差分析表明,一般来说,个体显著增加了锻炼的参与度,尤其是低强度和中等强度的活动,他们大多接受了列出的益处,但拒绝了列出的障碍,增加了对数字支持的参与度,在任何情感措施上的得分都不高。将封锁期间足够活跃和不够活跃的个体进行比较后发现,前者甚至更多地参与了身体活动,而后者的锻炼量与封锁前相同(即不足)或甚至更少。通过逻辑回归,揭示并讨论了属于足够活跃组的五个关键因素。审查了对政府和政策的实际影响。