Boys Rebecca M, Beausoleil Ngaio J, Betty Emma L, Stockin Karen A
Cetacean Ecology Research Group, School of Natural and Computational Sciences, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102-904, Auckland 0632, New Zealand.
Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, School of Veterinary Science, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Animals (Basel). 2021 May 19;11(5):1460. doi: 10.3390/ani11051460.
The compromised state of stranded cetaceans means that euthanasia is often required. However, current knowledge and implementation of euthanasia methods remain highly variable, with limited data on the practicalities and welfare impacts of procedures. This study evaluated the available published data on cetacean euthanasia, highlighting knowledge gaps and providing direction to improve stranded cetacean welfare. A total of 2147 peer-reviewed articles describing marine mammal euthanasia were examined. Of these 3.1% provided details on the method used, with 91% employing chemical methods. Two countries, the United Kingdom (UK) and New Zealand (NZ), provided euthanasia reports to the International Whaling Commission (IWC) between 2007 and 2020. Methods employed were reported for 78.3% and 100% of individual cetaceans euthanised in the UK and NZ, respectively. In the UK, chemical euthanasia was most common (52%), whilst in NZ only ballistics methods were used. Few data were available about time to death/insensibility (TTD); 0.5% of peer-reviewed articles provided TTD, whilst TTD was reported for 35% of individuals in the UK and for 98% in NZ. However, IWC reports lacked detail on how death/insensibility were assessed, with multiple individuals "presumed instantly" killed. Overall, the findings highlight the lack of available information on cetacean euthanasia, and suggest increased data collection and the application of appropriate methods to improve welfare.
搁浅鲸类动物的身体状况不佳意味着通常需要实施安乐死。然而,目前关于安乐死方法的知识和实施情况仍然差异很大,关于这些程序的实际操作和对动物福利影响的数据有限。本研究评估了已发表的有关鲸类动物安乐死的可用数据,突出了知识空白,并为改善搁浅鲸类动物的福利提供了方向。总共审查了2147篇描述海洋哺乳动物安乐死的同行评审文章。其中3.1%提供了所使用方法的详细信息,91%采用化学方法。英国和新西兰这两个国家在2007年至2020年期间向国际捕鲸委员会(IWC)提交了安乐死报告。在英国和新西兰,分别有78.3%和100%的被安乐死的鲸类个体报告了所采用的方法。在英国,化学安乐死最为常见(52%),而在新西兰仅使用枪击方法。关于死亡/失去知觉时间(TTD)的数据很少;0.5%的同行评审文章提供了TTD数据,而在英国,35%的个体报告了TTD,在新西兰这一比例为98%。然而,国际捕鲸委员会的报告缺乏关于如何评估死亡/失去知觉的细节,有多个个体被“假定立即”杀死。总体而言,研究结果突出了鲸类动物安乐死方面可用信息的匮乏,并建议增加数据收集以及应用适当方法来改善动物福利。