• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Speed, Change of Direction Speed and Reactive Agility in Adolescent Soccer Players: Age Related Differences.青少年足球运动员的速度、方向变化速度和反应敏捷性:与年龄相关的差异
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 30;18(11):5883. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115883.
2
The Importance of Reactive Agility Tests in Differentiating Adolescent Soccer Players.反应敏捷测试在区分青少年足球运动员中的重要性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 28;17(11):3839. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113839.
3
Agility Testing in Youth Football (Soccer)Players; Evaluating Reliability, Validity, and Correlates of Newly Developed Testing Protocols.青少年足球(足球)运动员敏捷性测试;评估新开发测试方案的可靠性、有效性和相关性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 1;17(1):294. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010294.
4
Importance of Reactive Agility and Change of Direction Speed in Differentiating Performance Levels in Junior Soccer Players: Reliability and Validity of Newly Developed Soccer-Specific Tests.反应敏捷性和变向速度在区分青少年足球运动员表现水平中的重要性:新开发的足球专项测试的信度和效度
Front Physiol. 2018 May 15;9:506. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00506. eCollection 2018.
5
Agility profile in sub-elite under-11 soccer players: is SAQ training adequate to improve sprint, change of direction speed and reactive agility performance?11岁以下次精英足球运动员的敏捷性概况:灵敏性、速度、变向速度和反应敏捷性训练是否足以提高短跑、变向速度和反应敏捷性表现?
Res Sports Med. 2016 Oct-Dec;24(4):331-340. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2016.1228063. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
6
SAQ training on sprint, change-of-direction speed, and agility in U-20 female football players.对 U-20 女足运动员进行短跑、变向速度和敏捷性的 SAQ 训练。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 13;19(3):e0299204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299204. eCollection 2024.
7
Relationship Between Reactive Agility and Change of Direction Speed in Amateur Soccer Players.业余足球运动员的反应敏捷性与变向速度之间的关系
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Jun;30(6):1547-52. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001262.
8
Time-motion and physiological profile of football training sessions performed by under-15, under-17 and under-19 elite Portuguese players.青少年精英足球训练的时间、动作和生理特征研究:以 15 岁以下、17 岁以下和 19 岁以下的葡萄牙球员为例。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 May;9(3):463-70. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0120. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
9
Repeated sprint and change-of-direction abilities in soccer players: effects of age group.足球运动员的重复冲刺和变向能力:年龄组的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Sep;27(9):2504-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827f540c.
10
Soccer-Specific Reactive Repeated-Sprint Ability in Elite Youth Soccer Players: Maturation Trends and Association With Various Physical Performance Tests.足球专项反应重复冲刺能力在精英青少年足球运动员中的发展趋势及其与各种体能测试的关系。
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Dec;34(12):3538-3545. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002362.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in isometric strength and sprinting speed of academy soccer players: a special interest in transition between the age groups and national team selected players.青少年足球运动员等长肌力和短跑速度的差异:对不同年龄组及入选国家队球员之间过渡情况的特别关注。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jul 17;7:1630522. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1630522. eCollection 2025.
2
Light-Based Reaction Speed Does Not Predict Field-Based Reactive Agility in Soccer Players.基于光的反应速度并不能预测足球运动员的场上反应敏捷性。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jun 24;10(3):239. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10030239.
3
Effects of speed, agility, and quickness (SAQ) training on soccer player performance-a systematic review and meta-analysis.速度、敏捷性和快速反应能力(SAQ)训练对足球运动员表现的影响——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 21;20(2):e0316846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316846. eCollection 2025.
4
Sex-specific relationship patterns between body morphology and maturity status with change of direction and agility in elite adolescent volleyball players.青少年精英排球运动员身体形态和成熟度与变向和敏捷性的性别特定关系模式。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 7;14(1):13170. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64190-6.
5
Strobe training as a visual training method that improves performance in climbing.频闪训练作为一种视觉训练方法,可提高攀岩表现。
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 May 20;6:1366448. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1366448. eCollection 2024.
6
The Effect on Flexibility and a Variety of Performance Tests of the Addition of 4 Weeks of Soleus Stretching to a Regular Dynamic Stretching Routine in Amateur Female Soccer Players.在业余女足运动员常规动态拉伸训练中增加4周比目鱼肌拉伸对柔韧性及各项运动表现测试的影响。
Sports (Basel). 2023 Jul 19;11(7):138. doi: 10.3390/sports11070138.
7
Relationship between Body Composition and Specific Motor Abilities According to Position in Elite Female Soccer Players.精英女子足球运动员身体成分与特定运动能力之间按位置划分的关系
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;20(2):1327. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021327.
8
The Effect of Using Reactive Agility Exercises with the FITLIGHT Training System on the Speed of Visual Reaction Time and Dribbling Skill of Basketball Players.使用带有FITLIGHT训练系统的反应敏捷性练习对篮球运动员视觉反应时间和运球技巧速度的影响。
Sports (Basel). 2022 Nov 14;10(11):176. doi: 10.3390/sports10110176.
9
Predictors of Reactive Agility in Early Puberty: A Multiple Regression Gender-Stratified Study.青春期早期反应敏捷性的预测因素:一项多元回归性别分层研究
Children (Basel). 2022 Nov 19;9(11):1780. doi: 10.3390/children9111780.
10
Reliability and Validity of a Novel Reactive Agility Test with Soccer Goalkeeper-Specific Movements.一种具有足球守门员特定动作的新型反应敏捷性测试的信度和效度
Sports (Basel). 2022 Oct 31;10(11):169. doi: 10.3390/sports10110169.

本文引用的文献

1
The Importance of Reactive Agility Tests in Differentiating Adolescent Soccer Players.反应敏捷测试在区分青少年足球运动员中的重要性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 28;17(11):3839. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113839.
2
Agility Testing in Youth Football (Soccer)Players; Evaluating Reliability, Validity, and Correlates of Newly Developed Testing Protocols.青少年足球(足球)运动员敏捷性测试;评估新开发测试方案的可靠性、有效性和相关性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 1;17(1):294. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010294.
3
Field-based physical performance of elite and sub-elite middle-adolescent soccer players.精英和次精英青少年中期足球运动员的实地体能表现。
Res Sports Med. 2019 Jan-Mar;27(1):60-71. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2018.1504217. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
4
Importance of Reactive Agility and Change of Direction Speed in Differentiating Performance Levels in Junior Soccer Players: Reliability and Validity of Newly Developed Soccer-Specific Tests.反应敏捷性和变向速度在区分青少年足球运动员表现水平中的重要性:新开发的足球专项测试的信度和效度
Front Physiol. 2018 May 15;9:506. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00506. eCollection 2018.
5
Are Change of Direction Speed and Reactive Agility Useful for Determining the Optimal Field Position for Young Soccer Players?变向速度和反应敏捷性对确定年轻足球运动员的最佳场上位置有用吗?
J Sports Sci Med. 2017 Jun 1;16(2):247-253. eCollection 2017 Jun.
6
Agility and change of direction in soccer: differences according to the player ages.足球运动中的敏捷性与方向变化:因球员年龄而异的差异
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Dec;57(12):1597-1604. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06562-2. Epub 2016 May 24.
7
Agility in Team Sports: Testing, Training and Factors Affecting Performance.团队运动中的敏捷性:测试、训练及影响表现的因素
Sports Med. 2016 Mar;46(3):421-42. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0428-2.
8
Effect of Different Sprint Training Methods on Sprint Performance Over Various Distances: A Brief Review.不同短跑训练方法对不同距离短跑成绩的影响:简要综述
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Jun;30(6):1767-85. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001245.
9
Reactive Agility Performance in Handball; Development and Evaluation of a Sport-Specific Measurement Protocol.手球运动中的反应敏捷性表现;一项特定运动测量方案的开发与评估
J Sports Sci Med. 2015 Aug 11;14(3):501-6. eCollection 2015 Sep.
10
Biomechanical Analysis of Defensive Cutting Actions During Game Situations: Six Cases in Collegiate Soccer Competitions.比赛场景中防守性切入动作的生物力学分析:大学足球比赛中的六个案例
J Hum Kinet. 2015 Jul 10;46:9-18. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0029. eCollection 2015 Jun 27.

青少年足球运动员的速度、方向变化速度和反应敏捷性:与年龄相关的差异

Speed, Change of Direction Speed and Reactive Agility in Adolescent Soccer Players: Age Related Differences.

作者信息

Andrašić Slobodan, Gušić Marko, Stanković Mima, Mačak Draženka, Bradić Asim, Sporiš Goran, Trajković Nebojša

机构信息

Faculty of Economics, University of Novi Sad, 24000 Subotica, Serbia.

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 30;18(11):5883. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115883.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18115883
PMID:34070867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8198575/
Abstract

There are a plethora of studies investigating agility in soccer; however, studies have rarely presented the reaction time in differentiating age groups in adolescent soccer players. We investigated age differences in reactive agility, speed, and change of direction speed (CODs), in a group of highly trained adolescent soccer players. A total of 75 adolescent male soccer players (aged 14-19 years) were recruited. The players were grouped based on their age to under 15 (U15; = 27), under 17 (U17; = 25), and under 19 (U19; = 23) players. Players were tested for 5 m, 10 m, and 20 m sprint, CODs speed test, Illinois test, and reactive agility test (total and reaction time). Only the reactive agility test with a live tester (RAT live) and RAT live reaction time (RAT live RT) distinguished U19 from both groups, U17 (RAT live, < 0.01; RAT RT live, < 0.01) and U15 (RAT live, < 0.01; RAT RT live, < 0.01). Groups did not have different times for 5 m sprint, RAT light and RAT RT light, F = 0.472, 2.691, 1.023, respectively, > 0.05. Moreover, a significantly slower average performance of sprint 20, CODs left and right, and Illinois was also observed in U15 as compared to U17 and U19 ( < 0.05). We can conclude that results in agility tests that include live testers can be a significant factor that differentiates between adolescent soccer players considering their age.

摘要

有大量研究探讨足球运动中的敏捷性;然而,很少有研究呈现青少年足球运动员不同年龄组之间的反应时间。我们调查了一组训练有素的青少年足球运动员在反应敏捷性、速度和变向速度(COD)方面的年龄差异。总共招募了75名青少年男性足球运动员(年龄在14 - 19岁之间)。这些运动员根据年龄分为15岁以下(U15;n = 27)、17岁以下(U17;n = 25)和19岁以下(U19;n = 23)三组。对运动员进行了5米、10米和20米短跑测试、COD速度测试、伊利诺伊测试以及反应敏捷性测试(总时间和反应时间)。只有有现场测试人员的反应敏捷性测试(RAT live)和RAT live反应时间(RAT live RT)能够区分U19组与U17组(RAT live,p < 0.01;RAT RT live,p < 0.01)和U15组(RAT live,p < 0.01;RAT RT live,p < 0.01)。各组在5米短跑、RAT light和RAT RT light测试中的时间没有差异,F值分别为0.472、2.691、1.023,p > 0.05。此外,与U17组和U19组相比,U15组在20米短跑、左右COD以及伊利诺伊测试中的平均表现明显更慢(p < 0.05)。我们可以得出结论,在包括现场测试人员的敏捷性测试中,结果可能是区分不同年龄青少年足球运动员的一个重要因素。