Hiscock Lucil, Bothma Carina, Hugo Arnold, van Biljon Angeline, Jansen van Rensburg Willem Sternberg
1Department of Consumer Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
2Department of Microbial, Biochemical and Food Biotechnology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
J Food Sci Technol. 2020 Feb;57(2):454-462. doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-04073-1. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
Hedonic assessment and sensory characteristics of 13 genotypes, stewed with onions, tomatoes and potatoes, were evaluated. 50 consumers ranked their preference on a nine-point hedonic scale to determine overall acceptability of the stewed samples. In addition, 100 consumers were asked to select sensory characteristics that described the genotypes best, using the Check-all-that-apply question. Hedonic responses indicated significant differences ( < 0.001) between stewed samples. Significant differences were also found in the frequency with which consumers used 15 of the 23 terms generated to characterise the sensory profile of stewed leaves. Correspondence analysis illustrated differences in sensory characteristics between genotypes, describing 72.4% variance. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering indicated three consumer preference clusters, while external preference mapping showed the regions of maximum liking. There was no correlation between hedonic evaluation and sensory characteristics. In addition, no strong association between specific species, genotypes and sensory attributes was observed.
对13种基因型与洋葱、番茄和土豆一起炖煮后的享乐评估和感官特性进行了评价。50名消费者在九点享乐量表上对他们的偏好进行排序,以确定炖煮样品的总体可接受性。此外,还要求100名消费者使用复选所有适用问题,选择最能描述这些基因型的感官特性。享乐反应表明炖煮样品之间存在显著差异(<0.001)。在消费者用来描述炖煮叶片感官特征的23个术语中,有15个术语的使用频率也存在显著差异。对应分析说明了基因型之间感官特征的差异,解释了72.4%的方差。凝聚层次聚类表明存在三个消费者偏好聚类,而外部偏好映射显示了最大喜好区域。享乐评估与感官特征之间没有相关性。此外,未观察到特定品种、基因型与感官属性之间有很强的关联。