Suppr超能文献

用魔术效果探索欧亚喜鹊()的感知能力。

Exploring the perceptual inabilities of Eurasian jays () using magic effects.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 15;118(24). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026106118.

Abstract

In recent years, scientists have begun to use magic effects to investigate the blind spots in our attention and perception [G. Kuhn, (2019); S. Macknik, S. Martinez-Conde, S. Blakeslee, (2010)]. Recently, we suggested that similar techniques could be transferred to nonhuman animal observers and that such an endeavor would provide insight into the inherent commonalities and discrepancies in attention and perception in human and nonhuman animals [E. Garcia-Pelegrin, A. K. Schnell, C. Wilkins, N. S. Clayton, 369, 1424-1426 (2020)]. Here, we performed three different magic effects (palming, French drop, and fast pass) to a sample of six Eurasian jays (). These magic effects were specifically chosen as they utilize different cues and expectations that mislead the spectator into thinking one object has or has not been transferred from one hand to the other. Results from palming and French drop experiments suggest that Eurasian jays have different expectations from humans when observing some of these effects. Specifically, Eurasian jays were not deceived by effects that required them to expect an object to move between hands when observing human hand manipulations. However, similar to humans, Eurasian jays were misled by magic effects that utilize fast movements as a deceptive action. This study investigates how another taxon perceives the magician's techniques of deception that commonly deceive humans.

摘要

近年来,科学家们开始利用魔术效果来研究我们注意力和感知中的盲点[G. Kuhn,(2019);S. Macknik,S. Martinez-Conde,S. Blakeslee,(2010)]。最近,我们提出,类似的技术可以转移到非人类动物观察者身上,这种努力将为人类和非人类动物的注意力和感知的固有共性和差异提供深入了解[E. Garcia-Pelegrin,A. K. Schnell,C. Wilkins,N. S. Clayton,369,1424-1426(2020)]。在这里,我们对六只欧洲椋鸟()进行了三种不同的魔术效果(手掌、法国掉落和快速传递)。之所以选择这些魔术效果,是因为它们利用了不同的线索和期望,使观众误以为一个物体已经或尚未从一只手转移到另一只手。手掌和法国掉落实验的结果表明,欧洲椋鸟在观察这些效果时与人类有不同的期望。具体来说,欧洲椋鸟在观察人类手部动作时,不会被需要它们预期物体在手部之间移动的效果所欺骗。然而,与人类相似,欧洲椋鸟会被利用快速动作作为欺骗动作的魔术效果所误导。这项研究调查了另一个分类单元如何感知魔术师常用的欺骗人类的技巧。

相似文献

1
Exploring the perceptual inabilities of Eurasian jays () using magic effects.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 15;118(24). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026106118.
3
Exclusion in corvids: the performance of food-caching Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius).
J Comp Psychol. 2013 Nov;127(4):428-35. doi: 10.1037/a0032010. Epub 2013 May 13.
5
Pilfering Eurasian jays use visual and acoustic information to locate caches.
Anim Cogn. 2014 Nov;17(6):1281-8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0763-y. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
6
Piagetian object permanence and its development in Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius).
Anim Cogn. 2007 Apr;10(2):243-58. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0063-2. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
7
Careful cachers and prying pilferers: Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius) limit auditory information available to competitors.
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 5;280(1752):20122238. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2238. Print 2013 Feb 7.
9
Mirror stimulation in Eurasian jays ().
PeerJ. 2023 Feb 15;11:e14729. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14729. eCollection 2023.
10
Investigating expert performance when observing magic effects.
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 24;12(1):5141. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09161-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncertainty monitoring in Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius).
Anim Cogn. 2025 May 15;28(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01960-3.
2
Investigating expert performance when observing magic effects.
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 24;12(1):5141. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09161-5.
4
Jays are sensitive to cognitive illusions.
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Aug 18;8(8):202358. doi: 10.1098/rsos.202358. eCollection 2021 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
An unexpected audience.
Science. 2020 Sep 18;369(6510):1424-1426. doi: 10.1126/science.abc6805.
2
The apparent action causation: Using a magician forcing technique to investigate our illusory sense of agency over the outcome of our choices.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Nov;73(11):1784-1795. doi: 10.1177/1747021820932916. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
3
The Flushtration Count Illusion: Attribute substitution tricks our interpretation of a simple visual event sequence.
Br J Psychol. 2018 Nov;109(4):850-861. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12306. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
4
The Other Side of Magic.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Jan;12(1):91-106. doi: 10.1177/1745691616654676.
6
7
Conjuring Deceptions: Fooling the Eye or Fooling the Mind?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jul;20(7):486-489. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 May 17.
8
The possibility of a science of magic.
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 16;6:1576. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01576. eCollection 2015.
9
Magically deceptive biological motion-the French Drop Sleight.
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 9;6:371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00371. eCollection 2015.
10
A framework for using magic to study the mind.
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 2;5:1508. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01508. eCollection 2014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验