Department of Day Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, NO.382 Wuyi Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.
Department of Interventional Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, NO.382 Wuyi Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.
Eur Spine J. 2021 Sep;30(9):2718-2725. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06887-0. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of patients underwent PVP for OVCF as day surgery with the outcomes of patients managed as traditional inpatients.
According to the selection criteria, patients who underwent PVP for single-segment thoracolumbar OVCF were included retrospectively in the day surgery procedure (DSP) group and the traditional inpatient procedure (TIP) group between April 2018 and September 2019. The visual analog scale score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score were recorded preoperatively and 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Duration of hospital stay, preoperative waiting time, hospital cost, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed.
A total of 335 patients (53 in DSP group; 282 in TIP group) were enrolled and completed 12-month follow-up. The mean duration of hospital stay, the mean preoperative waiting time, and the mean hospital costs were significant lower in the DSP group. The postoperative VAS and ODI scores in both groups were significantly improved after surgery. Moreover, both VAS and ODI scores at each follow-up stage were also significantly lower than the previous follow-up stage. However, the ODI score in the DSP group was significantly lower at 1-day, 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up, respectively. For cement leakage and secondary vertebral compression fractures, there was no statistical difference between the two groups.
We suggest that PVP for OVCFs in day surgery procedure is worthy of wide application.
本回顾性研究旨在评估和比较接受 PVP 治疗的 OVCF 患者日间手术与传统住院治疗的临床结果。
根据选择标准,回顾性地将 2018 年 4 月至 2019 年 9 月期间接受单节段胸腰椎 OVCF 的 PVP 治疗的患者纳入日间手术程序(DSP)组和传统住院程序(TIP)组。记录术前、术后 1 天、1 周、1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)评分。记录并分析住院时间、术前等待时间、住院费用和术后并发症。
共纳入 335 例患者(DSP 组 53 例,TIP 组 282 例),并完成了 12 个月的随访。DSP 组的平均住院时间、平均术前等待时间和平均住院费用均显著降低。两组术后 VAS 和 ODI 评分均显著改善。此外,各随访阶段的 VAS 和 ODI 评分均显著低于前一随访阶段。然而,DSP 组在术后 1 天、1 周、1 个月和 3 个月时的 ODI 评分分别显著降低。对于水泥渗漏和继发性椎体压缩性骨折,两组之间无统计学差异。
我们建议 OVCF 的 PVP 日间手术程序值得广泛应用。