Suppr超能文献

数字健康干预改善2型糖尿病成人患者的血糖控制:回顾性研究

Improved Glycemic Control With a Digital Health Intervention in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Zimmermann Gretchen, Venkatesan Aarathi, Rawlings Kelly, Scahill Michael D

机构信息

Vida Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Diabetes. 2021 Jun 2;6(2):e28033. doi: 10.2196/28033.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional lifestyle interventions have shown limited success in improving diabetes-related outcomes. Digital interventions with continuously available support and personalized educational content may offer unique advantages for self-management and glycemic control.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we evaluated changes in glycemic control among participants with type 2 diabetes who enrolled in a digital diabetes management program.

METHODS

The study employed a single-arm, retrospective design. A total of 950 participants with a hemoglobin A (HbA) baseline value of at least 7.0% enrolled in the Vida Health Diabetes Management Program. The intervention included one-to-one remote sessions with a Vida provider and structured lessons and tools related to diabetes management. HbA was the primary outcome measure. Of the 950 participants, 258 (27.2%) had a follow-up HbA completed at least 90 days from program start. Paired t tests were used to evaluate changes in HbA between baseline and follow-up. Additionally, a cluster-robust multiple regression analysis was employed to evaluate the relationship between high and low program usage and HbA change. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate the difference in HbA as a function of the measurement period (ie, pre-Vida enrollment, baseline, and postenrollment follow-up).

RESULTS

We observed a significant reduction in HbA of -0.81 points between baseline (mean 8.68, SD 1.7) and follow-up (mean 7.88, SD 1.46; t=7.71; P<.001). Among participants considered high risk (baseline HbA≥8), there was an average reduction of -1.44 points between baseline (mean 9.73, SD 1.68) and follow-up (mean 8.29, SD 1.64; t=9.14; P<.001). Additionally, average follow-up HbA (mean 7.82, SD 1.41) was significantly lower than pre-enrollment HbA (mean 8.12, SD 1.46; F=22.90; P<.001) There was also significant effect of program usage on HbA change (β=-.60; P<.001) such that high usage was associated with a greater decrease in HbA (mean -1.02, SD 1.60) compared to low usage (mean -.61, SD 1.72).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study revealed clinically meaningful improvements in glycemic control among participants enrolled in a digital diabetes management intervention. Higher program usage was associated with greater improvements in HbA. The findings of the present study suggest that a digital health intervention may represent an accessible, scalable, and effective solution to diabetes management and improved HbA. The study was limited by a nonrandomized, observational design and limited postenrollment follow-up data.

摘要

背景

传统的生活方式干预在改善糖尿病相关结局方面成效有限。具备持续可用支持和个性化教育内容的数字干预可能为自我管理和血糖控制带来独特优势。

目的

在本研究中,我们评估了参加数字糖尿病管理项目的2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的变化情况。

方法

本研究采用单臂回顾性设计。共有950名血红蛋白A(HbA)基线值至少为7.0%的参与者参加了维达健康糖尿病管理项目。干预措施包括与维达健康服务人员进行一对一远程会诊,以及提供与糖尿病管理相关的结构化课程和工具。HbA是主要结局指标。在这950名参与者中,258名(27.2%)在项目开始至少90天后完成了随访HbA检测。采用配对t检验评估基线和随访之间HbA的变化。此外,采用聚类稳健多元回归分析评估项目高使用量和低使用量与HbA变化之间的关系。采用重复测量方差分析评估作为测量期(即维达健康项目注册前、基线和注册后随访)函数的HbA差异。

结果

我们观察到基线(均值8.68,标准差1.7)和随访(均值7.88,标准差1.46;t=7.71;P<0.001)之间HbA显著降低了0.81个百分点。在被视为高风险的参与者(基线HbA≥8)中,基线(均值9.73,标准差1.68)和随访(均值8.29,标准差1.64;t=9.14;P<0.001)之间平均降低了1.44个百分点。此外,随访时的平均HbA(均值7.82,标准差1.41)显著低于注册前的HbA(均值8.12,标准差1.46;F=22.90;P<0.001)。项目使用量对HbA变化也有显著影响(β=-0.60;P<0.001),与低使用量(均值-0.61,标准差1.72)相比,高使用量与HbA更大幅度的降低(均值-1.02,标准差1.60)相关。

结论

本研究显示,参加数字糖尿病管理干预的参与者在血糖控制方面有具有临床意义的改善。更高的项目使用量与HbA的更大改善相关。本研究结果表明,数字健康干预可能是一种可及、可扩展且有效的糖尿病管理及改善HbA的解决方案。本研究受到非随机观察性设计和注册后随访数据有限的限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fc2/8209528/7342c9d463d5/diabetes_v6i2e28033_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验