Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States.
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 May;12(3):518-527. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730999. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
A minimum dataset (MDS) can be determined ad hoc by an investigator or small team; by a metadata expert; or by using a consensus method to take advantage of the global knowledge and expertise of a large group of experts. The first method is the most commonly applied.
Here, we describe a use of the third approach using a modified Delphi method to determine the optimal MDS for a dataset of full body computed tomography scans. The scans are of decedents whose deaths were investigated at the New Mexico Office of the Medical Investigator and constitute the New Mexico Decedent Image Database (NMDID).
The authors initiated the consensus process by suggesting 50 original variables to elicit expert reactions. Experts were recruited from a variety of scientific disciplines and from around the world. Three rounds of variable selection showed high rates of consensus.
In total, 59 variables were selected, only 52% of which the original resource authors selected. Using a snowball method, a second set of experts was recruited to validate the variables chosen in the design phase. During the validation phase, no variables were selected for deletion.
NMDID is likely to remain more "future proof" than if a single metadata expert or only the original team of investigators designed the metadata.
最小数据集 (MDS) 可以由调查人员或小团队、元数据专家或使用共识方法来确定,以利用大量专家的全球知识和专业知识。第一种方法是最常用的。
在这里,我们使用修改后的 Delphi 方法描述了第三种方法在确定全身计算机断层扫描数据集的最佳 MDS 方面的应用。这些扫描是死者的扫描,他们的死亡是在新墨西哥州法医办公室进行调查的,构成了新墨西哥州死者图像数据库 (NMDID)。
作者通过提出 50 个原始变量来引发专家反应,从而启动共识过程。专家来自各种科学学科和世界各地。三轮变量选择显示出高度的共识。
总共选择了 59 个变量,其中只有 52%是原始资源作者选择的。使用滚雪球方法,招募了第二组专家来验证设计阶段选择的变量。在验证阶段,没有选择删除任何变量。
与由单个元数据专家或仅由最初的调查人员团队设计元数据相比,NMDID 可能更“面向未来”。