School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002248.
Standard curative treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves surgery in combination with postoperative (adjuvant) platinum-based chemotherapy where indicated. Preoperative (neoadjuvant) therapies offer certain theoretical benefits compared with adjuvant approaches, including the ability to assess on-treatment response, reduce the tumor bulk prior to surgery, and enhance tolerability in the preoperative setting. Indeed, the use of neoadjuvant therapies are well established in other cancers such as breast and rectal cancers to debulk the tumor and guide ongoing therapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy has similar efficacy but less toxicity in NSCLC. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting programmed death-1 (PD1)/PD1-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have transformed the treatment of advanced NSCLC; the unique mechanisms of action of ICI offer additional rationale for assessment in the neoadjuvant setting. Preclinical studies in mouse cancer models support the proof of concept of neoadjuvant ICI (NAICI) through improvement of T-cell effector function and long-term memory induction. Preliminary early-phase human trial data support the proposition that NAICI in NSCLC may provide an feasible and potentially efficacious future treatment strategy and large, randomized phase III trials are currently recruiting to assess this approach. However, outstanding issues include defining optimal treatment combinations which balance high efficacy with acceptable toxicity, validating biomarkers to aid in patient selection, and avoiding potential pitfalls such as missing a window for successful surgery, that is, choosing the right drugs, for the right patient, at the right time. Predictive biomarkers to direct selection of therapy are required, and the validation of major pathological response (MPR) as a surrogate for survival will be important in the uptake of the neoadjuvant approach.
早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗包括手术联合术后(辅助)铂类化疗,在有指征的情况下。与辅助方法相比,术前(新辅助)治疗具有某些理论优势,包括能够评估治疗反应、在手术前缩小肿瘤体积以及增强术前的耐受性。事实上,新辅助治疗在乳腺癌和直肠癌等其他癌症中的应用已得到充分确立,以缩小肿瘤并指导持续治疗,新辅助化疗在 NSCLC 中具有相似的疗效但毒性较小。最近,针对程序性死亡受体 1(PD1)/PD1 配体 1(PD-L1)的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)改变了晚期 NSCLC 的治疗方法;ICI 的独特作用机制为在新辅助治疗中进行评估提供了更多的理由。在小鼠癌症模型中的临床前研究支持通过改善 T 细胞效应功能和诱导长期记忆来进行新辅助 ICI(NAICI)的概念验证。初步的早期人类试验数据支持 NSCLC 中 NAICI 可能提供可行且潜在有效的未来治疗策略的主张,目前正在进行大型、随机的 III 期试验来评估这种方法。然而,仍存在一些未解决的问题,包括定义平衡高疗效和可接受毒性的最佳治疗组合、验证有助于患者选择的生物标志物,以及避免潜在的陷阱,例如错过成功手术的窗口期,即选择合适的药物,为合适的患者,在合适的时间。需要预测性生物标志物来指导治疗选择,并且主要病理反应(MPR)作为生存的替代标志物的验证对于新辅助方法的采用将非常重要。