• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估IX型玻璃离子水门汀和Cention N的抗压强度、剪切粘结强度及显微硬度值。

Evaluation of compressive strength, shear bond strength, and microhardness values of glass-ionomer cement Type IX and Cention N.

作者信息

Verma Vishakha, Mathur Shivani, Sachdev Vinod, Singh Divya

机构信息

ITS-CDSR, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, ITS-CDSR, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2020 Nov-Dec;23(6):550-553. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_109_19. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

DOI:10.4103/JCD.JCD_109_19
PMID:34083907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8095699/
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to compare the compressive strength, shear bond strength, and microhardness of glass-ionomer cement (GIC) Type IX and Cention N.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five samples each of GIC Type IX and Cention N were prepared for testing the shear bond strength, tensile strength, and microhardness. Cylinders of the samples measuring 1 cm diameter and 6 mm height were prepared for compressive strength and shear bond strength. For shear bond strength, these samples were embedded into acrylic blocks of dimensions 2 cm × 2 cm. Testing of shear bond strength and compressive strength was done by mounting the samples in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The samples for microhardness were 1 cm diameter and 5 mm height. The samples were mounted on Vickers microhardness testing machine to test the microhardness.

RESULTS

The values for shear bond strength of Cention N were statistically highly significant ( < 0.01) as compared to GIC Type IX, whereas the compressive strength and microhardness values of Cention N were statistically significant ( < 0.5) as compared to GIC Type IX.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest significantly higher values for mechanical properties of Cention N as compared to GIC Type IX.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较IX型玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)和Cention N的抗压强度、剪切粘结强度及显微硬度。

材料与方法

制备IX型GIC和Cention N各五个样本,用于测试剪切粘结强度、拉伸强度和显微硬度。制备直径1 cm、高6 mm的样本圆柱体,用于抗压强度和剪切粘结强度测试。对于剪切粘结强度测试,将这些样本嵌入尺寸为2 cm×2 cm的丙烯酸树脂块中。通过将样本安装在十字头速度为1 mm/min的万能试验机上进行剪切粘结强度和抗压强度测试。用于显微硬度测试的样本直径为1 cm、高5 mm。将样本安装在维氏显微硬度试验机上测试显微硬度。

结果

与IX型GIC相比,Cention N的剪切粘结强度值具有高度统计学意义(<0.01),而Cention N的抗压强度和显微硬度值与IX型GIC相比具有统计学意义(<0.5)。

结论

结果表明,与IX型GIC相比,Cention N的力学性能值显著更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0788/8095699/261ca3e922e5/JCD-23-550-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0788/8095699/261ca3e922e5/JCD-23-550-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0788/8095699/261ca3e922e5/JCD-23-550-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of compressive strength, shear bond strength, and microhardness values of glass-ionomer cement Type IX and Cention N.评估IX型玻璃离子水门汀和Cention N的抗压强度、剪切粘结强度及显微硬度值。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Nov-Dec;23(6):550-553. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_109_19. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
2
Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study.IX型玻璃离子水门汀、含氯己定玻璃离子水门汀和含三氯生玻璃离子水门汀的抗压强度、径向拉伸强度和剪切粘结强度的比较评价:一项体外研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Apr;6(Suppl 1):S64-9. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.181188.
3
An In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties and Fluoride-releasing Ability of a New Self-cure Filling Material.一种新型自固化填充材料机械性能和释氟能力的体外评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):134-139.
4
Evaluation and Comparison of Physical Properties of Cention N with Other Restorative Materials in Artificial Saliva: An Study.人工唾液中Cention N与其他修复材料物理性能的评估与比较:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 May-Jun;15(3):350-355. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2383.
5
In Vitro Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Cention N and Its Comparison with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) Restorative Material as Used in Primary Teeth.体外评估 Cention N 的机械性能及其与用于乳牙的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)修复材料的比较。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2024 Jan 2;2024:9420336. doi: 10.1155/2024/9420336. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.Cention-N、复合树脂和玻璃离子水门汀修复材料的力学性能和微渗漏性能的比较评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jun 1;21(6):691-695.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Water Sorption, Solubility, and Microhardness of Zirconia-reinforced Glass Ionomer, Resin-modified Glass Ionomer, and Type IX Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials: An Study.氧化锆增强玻璃离子水门汀、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和IX型玻璃离子水门汀修复材料的吸水性、溶解性和显微硬度的比较评价:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Mar-Apr;15(2):175-181. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2364.
8
A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials.三种修复材料的微渗漏及牙本质剪切粘结强度的比较评估
Biomater Investig Dent. 2022 Feb 10;9(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2022.2033623. eCollection 2022.
9
Mechanical and dentin bond strength properties of the nanosilver enriched glass ionomer cement.富纳米银玻璃离子水门汀的机械性能及与牙本质的粘结强度特性
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Mar 1;11(3):e275-e281. doi: 10.4317/jced.55522. eCollection 2019 Mar.
10
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin of Primary Teeth: An Study.不同玻璃离子水门汀与乳牙牙本质剪切粘结强度的比较评价:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):192-196. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1362. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
An Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of ChemFil Superior, Cention-N, Giomer and Zirconomer as Restorative Materials in Class-V Lesions.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1634-S1636. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_200_25. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Comparison of Proanthocyanidin and EDTA in Enhancing Shear Bond Strength of Giomer and Cention N to Human Dentin: An Study.原花青素与乙二胺四乙酸在增强聚硅氧烷黏固粉和Cention N与人牙本质的剪切粘结强度方面的比较:一项研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):61-68. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_178_24. eCollection 2025 Jan-Feb.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Surface Microhardness of Zirconia-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement after Immersion in an Acidic Drink: An Study.氧化锆增强玻璃离子水门汀和传统玻璃离子水门汀浸泡在酸性饮料后表面显微硬度的比较评价:一项研究。

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing marginal microleakage of three Bulk Fill composites in Class II cavities using confocal microscope: An in vitro study.使用共聚焦显微镜比较三种大块充填复合树脂在II类洞中的边缘微渗漏:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;18(5):409-13. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.164058.
2
Guideline on caries-risk assessment and management for infants, children, and adolescents.婴幼儿、儿童及青少年龋病风险评估与管理指南。
Pediatr Dent. 2013 Sep-Oct;35(5):E157-64.
3
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various esthetic restorative materials to dentin: an in vitro study.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025 Jan;18(1):6-12. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3019. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
An In Vitro Assessment of the Shear Bond Strength of Alkasite Restorative Material in Primary Molars Compared with Glass Ionomer and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations.与玻璃离子体和树脂改性玻璃离子体修复材料相比,乳牙中碱土长石修复材料剪切粘结强度的体外评估
Materials (Basel). 2024 Dec 20;17(24):6230. doi: 10.3390/ma17246230.
5
Comparative Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of a Bioactive Material Enhanced by Phytosynthesized Nanoparticles: An Study.植物合成纳米颗粒增强生物活性材料力学性能的比较评估:一项研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2023 Oct-Dec;14(4):277-281. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_140_23. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
6
In vitro characterization of a novel resin-based restorative material containing alkaline fillers.新型含碱性填料树脂基修复材料的体外特性研究
J Appl Oral Sci. 2024 Jan 15;32:e20230219. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0219. eCollection 2024.
7
In Vitro Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Cention N and Its Comparison with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) Restorative Material as Used in Primary Teeth.体外评估 Cention N 的机械性能及其与用于乳牙的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)修复材料的比较。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2024 Jan 2;2024:9420336. doi: 10.1155/2024/9420336. eCollection 2024.
8
Optimizing Dental Bond Strength: Insights from Comprehensive Literature Review and Future Implications for Clinical Practice.优化牙粘结强度:综合文献综述的见解及对临床实践的未来启示
Biomedicines. 2023 Nov 8;11(11):2995. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11112995.
9
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three different glass ionomer cement (conventional, zirconium-reinforced and advanced glass hybrid) in primary molars: an in vitro study.三种不同玻璃离子水门汀(传统型、锆增强型和改良型玻璃混合体)在乳磨牙中黏结强度的对比评估:一项体外研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2023 Aug;24(4):491-497. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00817-y. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
10
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Nanohybrid Composite Restoration After the Placement of Flowable Compomer and Composite Using the Snowplow Technique.使用推雪技术放置可流动复合树脂和复合树脂后,纳米混合复合修复体剪切粘结强度的比较评估。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 1;14(9):e28663. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28663. eCollection 2022 Sep.
不同美学修复材料与牙本质之间剪切粘结强度的比较评估:一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Jan-Mar;29(1):7-13. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.79913.
4
Dental caries and pulpal disease.龋齿和牙髓病。
Dent Clin North Am. 2011 Jan;55(1):29-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.08.010.
5
The use of dental amalgam in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature.牙科汞合金在儿童牙科中的应用:文献综述
Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):439-47.
6
Clinical decision-making for caries management in primary teeth.乳牙龋病管理的临床决策
J Dent Educ. 2001 Oct;65(10):1133-42.