• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外评估 Cention N 的机械性能及其与用于乳牙的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)修复材料的比较。

In Vitro Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Cention N and Its Comparison with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) Restorative Material as Used in Primary Teeth.

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India.

Kerala Institute of Medical Sciences, Trivandrum 695029, India.

出版信息

ScientificWorldJournal. 2024 Jan 2;2024:9420336. doi: 10.1155/2024/9420336. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1155/2024/9420336
PMID:38205145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10776193/
Abstract

METHODS

22 specimens prepared with Cention and RMGIC were embedded in primary teeth mounted in acrylic for analysing shear bond strength. Shear bond strength was analysed using a universal testing machine. The modes of failure in samples were observed under a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. 22 customised samples of Cention N and RMGIC were prepared and categorised as group A and group B, respectively. The flexural and compressive strengths of these samples were evaluated using a universal testing machine.

RESULTS

The shear bond strength of RMGIC was higher than that of Cention N, whereas the compressive and flexural strengths of Cention N were significantly higher than those of RMGIC. The modes of failure were predominantly adhesive followed by mixed failures.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that Cention N demonstrated superior mechanical properties compared with RMGIC and can therefore be recommended for restorations in primary posterior teeth. Cention N being a smart, esthetic, self-cured, or dual-cured material with better mechanical properties offers a wide range of applicability in primary teeth.

摘要

方法

将 22 个用 Cention 和 RMGIC 制备的样本嵌入到初级牙齿中,用丙烯酸固定以分析其剪切粘结强度。使用万能试验机分析剪切粘结强度。在体视显微镜和扫描电子显微镜下观察样本的失效模式。制备了 22 个定制的 Cention N 和 RMGIC 样本,并分别归类为 A 组和 B 组。使用万能试验机评估这些样本的弯曲强度和压缩强度。

结果

RMGIC 的剪切粘结强度高于 Cention N,而 Cention N 的抗压强度和弯曲强度明显高于 RMGIC。失效模式主要为黏附性失效,其次为混合性失效。

结论

本研究结果表明,Cention N 表现出比 RMGIC 更优异的机械性能,因此可推荐用于修复初级后牙。Cention N 作为一种智能、美观、自固化或双重固化材料,具有更好的机械性能,在初级牙齿中具有广泛的适用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d53a/10776193/c028adadfbcd/TSWJ2024-9420336.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d53a/10776193/b6d50f2a433d/TSWJ2024-9420336.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d53a/10776193/6a7c78d42342/TSWJ2024-9420336.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d53a/10776193/c028adadfbcd/TSWJ2024-9420336.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d53a/10776193/b6d50f2a433d/TSWJ2024-9420336.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d53a/10776193/6a7c78d42342/TSWJ2024-9420336.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d53a/10776193/c028adadfbcd/TSWJ2024-9420336.003.jpg

相似文献

1
In Vitro Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Cention N and Its Comparison with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) Restorative Material as Used in Primary Teeth.体外评估 Cention N 的机械性能及其与用于乳牙的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)修复材料的比较。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2024 Jan 2;2024:9420336. doi: 10.1155/2024/9420336. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of compressive strength, shear bond strength, and microhardness values of glass-ionomer cement Type IX and Cention N.评估IX型玻璃离子水门汀和Cention N的抗压强度、剪切粘结强度及显微硬度值。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Nov-Dec;23(6):550-553. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_109_19. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
3
In Vitro Comparison of Surface Roughness, Flexural, and Microtensile Strength of Various Glass-Ionomer-Based Materials and a New Alkasite Restorative Material.不同玻璃离子基材料与一种新型碱土长石修复材料的表面粗糙度、挠曲强度和微拉伸强度的体外比较
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Jan 27;15(3):650. doi: 10.3390/polym15030650.
4
An In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties and Fluoride-releasing Ability of a New Self-cure Filling Material.一种新型自固化填充材料机械性能和释氟能力的体外评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):134-139.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.Cention-N、复合树脂和玻璃离子水门汀修复材料的力学性能和微渗漏性能的比较评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jun 1;21(6):691-695.
6
Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An study.使用和不使用粘结系统时,一种碱硅铝酸盐修复材料与三种不同衬层的剪切粘结强度评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 May-Jun;24(3):278-282. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_193_21. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
7
Bond strengths between composite resin and auto cure glass ionomer cement using the co-cure technique.采用共固化技术时复合树脂与自凝玻璃离子水门汀之间的粘结强度。
Aust Dent J. 2006 Jun;51(2):175-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00423.x.
8
Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.光固化填充封闭剂对用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结的金属和陶瓷托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Feb;135(2):194-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.024.
9
Comparison of 3- and 90-day bond strengths of 3 types of cement to nickel-chromium alloy.比较 3 种黏结剂与镍铬合金之间的 3 天和 90 天黏结强度。
Gen Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;70(1):30-33.
10
Fiber reinforcement of a resin modified glass ionomer cement.纤维增强树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀。
Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1516-1523. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of CENTION-N compared to glass-ionomer cement on shear bond strength and micro-leakage of primary teeth restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与玻璃离子水门汀相比,CENTION-N对乳牙修复体抗剪粘结强度和微渗漏的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Saudi Dent J. 2025 Aug 19;37(7-9):39. doi: 10.1007/s44445-025-00049-4.
2
Bioactive restorative materials in dentistry: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, clinical applications, and future directions.牙科生物活性修复材料:作用机制、临床应用及未来方向的全面综述
Odontology. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01162-w.
3
Comparative evaluation on the masking ability of different tooth colored restoration over blackish discoloration caused by 38% silver diamine fluoride: an in -vitro study.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical performance of an alkasite-based bioactive restorative in class II cavities: a randomized clinical trial.基于 alkasite 的生物活性修复材料在 II 类窝洞中的临床性能:一项随机临床试验。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2023 Jun 23;31:e20230025. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0025. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparison of antibacterial activity and fluoride release in tooth-colored restorative materials: Resin-modified glass ionomer, zirconomer, giomer, and cention N.牙齿色修复材料的抗菌活性与氟释放比较:树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、锆基陶瓷、聚酸改性复合树脂及Cention N
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2022 Dec 14;19:104. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of three different restorative materials in primary teeth: an in vitro study.
不同牙齿颜色修复材料对38%氟化银氨引起的牙齿变黑的遮盖能力的比较评价:一项体外研究。
BDJ Open. 2025 Mar 17;11(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s41405-025-00318-8.
4
Influence of photodynamic and sonodynamic disinfection on the bond strength of caries-affected dentin bonded to three different tooth-colored restorative materials: A comparative study.光动力和超声动力消毒对与三种不同牙齿颜色修复材料粘结的龋损牙本质粘结强度的影响:一项比较研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Feb;28(2):193-198. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_532_24. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
5
An In Vitro Assessment of the Shear Bond Strength of Alkasite Restorative Material in Primary Molars Compared with Glass Ionomer and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations.与玻璃离子体和树脂改性玻璃离子体修复材料相比,乳牙中碱土长石修复材料剪切粘结强度的体外评估
Materials (Basel). 2024 Dec 20;17(24):6230. doi: 10.3390/ma17246230.
6
Effect of the Different Dietary Supplements on the Average Surface Roughness and Color Stability of Direct Restorative Materials Used in Pediatric Dentistry.不同膳食补充剂对儿童牙科直接修复材料平均表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性的影响。
Children (Basel). 2024 May 27;11(6):645. doi: 10.3390/children11060645.
三种不同修复材料在乳牙中物理和机械性能的比较:一项体外研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022 Oct;23(5):821-828. doi: 10.1007/s40368-022-00734-6. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite - An study.Cention N与树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀及复合树脂弯曲强度的评估与比较——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2022 May-Jun;25(3):288-291. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_627_21. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
5
Evaluation of compressive strength, shear bond strength, and microhardness values of glass-ionomer cement Type IX and Cention N.评估IX型玻璃离子水门汀和Cention N的抗压强度、剪切粘结强度及显微硬度值。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Nov-Dec;23(6):550-553. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_109_19. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
6
Flexural properties and dentin adhesion in recently developed self-adhesive bulk-fill materials.新型自粘接大体积充填材料的弯曲性能和牙本质粘接性。
J Oral Sci. 2021 Mar 31;63(2):139-144. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.20-0448. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.Cention-N、复合树脂和玻璃离子水门汀修复材料的力学性能和微渗漏性能的比较评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jun 1;21(6):691-695.
8
Comparison of shear bond strength of light cure mineral trioxide aggregate and light cure calcium hydroxide with nanofilled composite: A stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscope analysis.光固化三氧化矿物凝聚体和光固化氢氧化钙与纳米复合树脂的剪切粘结强度比较:立体显微镜和扫描电子显微镜分析
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020 Jan-Mar;38(1):56-63. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_178_19.
9
Wear of resin composites: Current insights into underlying mechanisms, evaluation methods and influential factors.树脂复合材料的磨损:对潜在机制、评估方法及影响因素的当前见解
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2018 May;54(2):76-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
10
What constitutes an ideal dental restorative material?什么构成了理想的牙科修复材料?
Adv Dent Res. 2013 Nov;25(1):18-23. doi: 10.1177/0022034513502206.