Suppr超能文献

分次二氧化碳激光与分次二氧化碳激光联合自体病灶内富血小板血浆治疗稳定型非节段性白癜风的随机对照研究

Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser versus Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser with Autologous Intralesional Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Stable, Non-segmental Vitiligo: A Randomized Comparative Study.

作者信息

Raizada Annie, Panda Maitreyee, Singh Bhabani Stp, Kar Bikash R

机构信息

Department of DVL, Institute of Medical Sciences & SUM Hospital, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

出版信息

J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):55-63. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_188_19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment of vitiligo is often challenging and requires a multi-modality approach. Fractional carbon dioxide (FCO) laser has been studied as an adjuvant therapy in cases of vitiligo. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is rich in growth factors, which may contribute to the growth of melanocytes, and thus help in the repigmentation of vitiligo patches. We aimed to study the combination of these two modalities for the treatment of vitiligo.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FCO laser with PRP and FCO laser alone as an adjuvant therapy in stable non-segmental vitiligo (NSV) patients.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, comparative, open-label interventional study was carried out for a period of 18 months from December 2017 to June 2019, at a tertiary care hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy patients with stable, NSV were assessed for eligibility; 66 patients were randomized equally into two groups. Group A received treatment with FCO laser with intralesional PRP, whereas Group B was treated with FCO laser alone. Patients in both the groups were treated with one therapy session and were followed up monthly for a period of 3 months. All the patients received topical psoralen with ultraviolet A (UVA) PUVA-sol treatment. Baseline and monthly assessments were done by VITILIGO AREA SEVERITY INDEX and standardized photographs.

RESULTS

VASI score reduction was significantly more in the Group A with (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) 9.5 ± 0.22, 5.8 ± 1.12, and 3.6 ± 1.81 as compared to Group B 11.9 ± 2.83, 9.9 ± 3.11, and 8.9 ± 3.46 at each subsequent follow-up visits, respectively. Side effects such as burning sensation, erythema, and crusting were seen less frequently and lasted for a short period in Group A in comparison to those in Group B.

CONCLUSION

Combination of FCO laser and autologous intralesional PRP has a synergetic effect in treating patients with vitiligo as an adjuvant therapy with minimal adverse effects.

摘要

背景

白癜风的治疗通常具有挑战性,需要采用多模式方法。分次二氧化碳(FCO)激光已被研究作为白癜风病例的辅助治疗方法。自体富血小板血浆(PRP)富含生长因子,这可能有助于黑素细胞的生长,从而有助于白癜风斑块的复色。我们旨在研究这两种模式联合用于治疗白癜风。

目的

本研究的目的是比较FCO激光联合PRP与单独使用FCO激光作为稳定型非节段性白癜风(NSV)患者辅助治疗的疗效和安全性。

设置与设计

2017年12月至2019年6月,在一家三级医院进行了一项为期18个月的前瞻性、随机、对照、开放标签的干预性研究。

材料与方法

评估70例稳定型NSV患者的入选资格;66例患者被平均随机分为两组。A组接受FCO激光联合皮损内注射PRP治疗,而B组仅接受FCO激光治疗。两组患者均接受一次治疗,并每月随访3个月。所有患者均接受外用补骨脂素联合紫外线A(UVA)光化学疗法(PUVA-sol)治疗。通过白癜风面积严重程度指数和标准化照片进行基线和每月评估。

结果

与B组相比,A组在每次后续随访时的白癜风面积严重程度指数(VASI)评分降低更为显著,分别为(均值±标准差[SD])9.5±0.22、5.8±1.12和3.6±1.81,而B组分别为11.9±2.83、9.9±3.11和8.9±3.46。与B组相比,A组的烧灼感、红斑和结痂等副作用出现频率较低,持续时间较短。

结论

FCO激光与自体皮损内PRP联合作为辅助治疗白癜风患者具有协同作用,且不良反应最小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae37/8149972/585ccb4f63b4/JCAS-14-55-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验