From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Bingol State Hospital, Bingol, Turkey.
From the Department of Family Medicine, Sukru Pasa Family Health Center, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ann Saudi Med. 2021 May-Jun;41(3):127-134. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2021.127. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
Migraine is a prevalent disabling primary headache disorder that is classified into two major types: migraine without aura and migraine with aura. New therapeutic methods to reduce migraine headaches in the emergency department (ED) include intradermal mesotherapy.
Compare the efficacy of intradermal mesotherapy versus a systemic therapy in pain control in patients with headache related to migraine without aura.
Prospective parallel-group randomized controlled trial.
University hospital in Turkey.
Patients 18 years of age and older who were admitted to the ED over a 15-month period with headache related to migraine without aura were eligible for inclusion if they had a VAS score of 4 or above. Patients were randomly allocated to one session of mesotherapy or intravenous dexketoprofen. Changes in pain intensity were measured by the score on a visual analog scale (VAS) at 30, 60, and 120 minutes and 24 hours after treatment. Efficacy was also assessed by the need for use of an analgesic drug within 24 hours, by readmission with the same complaint to the ED within 72 hours, and by adverse effect rates.
Pain intensity on the VAS scale.
148 patients (154 enrolled and treated; 1 patient in the mesotherapy and 5 patients in the systemic therapy group lost to follow up).
Pain intensity on the VAS scale decreased from a median score of 8 to 4 in the mesotherapy group and from 8 to 5 in the systemic therapy group. These differences were statistically significant from baseline for all time intervals (=.001 to 30 minutes, =.004 to 60 minutes, =.005 to 120 minutes, and =.002 to 24 hours). The need to use analgesics and the rate of readmission to the ED were higher in the systemic therapy group (=.013 and =.030, respectively). Adverse effect rates were minimal and similar in the study groups during the one-week follow-up period.
Mesotherapy is more efficacious than intravenous dexketoprofen in the management of acute attack of migraine without aura in the ED.
Unblinded. Valid for assessing short-term pain relief, but not sufficient to predict long-term efficacy. Not generalizable because single center and small sample size.
None.
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04519346).
偏头痛是一种常见的致残性原发性头痛疾病,可分为无先兆偏头痛和有先兆偏头痛两种主要类型。减少急诊室(ED)偏头痛头痛的新治疗方法包括皮内间充质疗法。
比较皮内间充质疗法与全身治疗在控制无先兆偏头痛相关头痛患者疼痛方面的疗效。
前瞻性平行组随机对照试验。
土耳其一所大学医院。
在 15 个月的时间内,因无先兆偏头痛相关头痛而被收入 ED 的年龄在 18 岁及以上的患者,如果他们的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分在 4 分或以上,将符合纳入标准。患者被随机分配到单次间充质治疗或静脉注射右酮洛芬。治疗后 30、60、120 分钟和 24 小时,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分测量疼痛强度的变化。通过 24 小时内使用镇痛药的需要、72 小时内因相同主诉再次到 ED 就诊的需要以及不良反应发生率来评估疗效。
VAS 量表上的疼痛强度。
148 例患者(154 例入组和治疗;1 例皮内间充质治疗组和 5 例全身治疗组患者失访)。
皮内间充质治疗组的 VAS 评分从基线时的中位数 8 分降至 4 分,全身治疗组从 8 分降至 5 分。所有时间间隔的差异均具有统计学意义(=0.001 至 30 分钟,=0.004 至 60 分钟,=0.005 至 120 分钟,=0.002 至 24 小时)。全身治疗组需要使用镇痛药和再次因相同主诉到 ED 就诊的比例更高(=0.013 和=0.030)。在为期一周的随访期间,研究组的不良反应发生率较低且相似。
在 ED 中,皮内间充质治疗在管理无先兆偏头痛急性发作方面比静脉内右酮洛芬更有效。
非盲法。仅评估短期疼痛缓解效果,不足以预测长期疗效。不可推广,因为单中心和样本量小。
无。
ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04519346)。