Research Group Computed Tomography, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Wels, Austria.
Institut für Röntgendiagnostik und Nuklearmedizin, Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany.
J Anat. 2021 Oct;239(4):755-770. doi: 10.1111/joa.13465. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
The combination of computer-aided design (CAD) techniques based on computed tomography (CT) data to generate patient-specific implants is in use for decades. However, persisting disadvantages are complicated design procedures and rigid reconstruction protocols, for example, for tailored implants mimicking the patient-specific thickness distribution of missing cranial bone. In this study we used two different approaches, CAD- versus thin-plate spline (TPS)-based implants, to reconstruct extensive unilateral and bilateral cranial defects in three clinical cases. We used CT data of three complete human crania that were virtually damaged according to the missing regions in the clinical cases. In total, we carried out 132 virtual reconstructions and quantified accuracy from the original to the generated implant and deviations in the resulting implant thickness as root-mean-square error (RMSE). Reconstructions using TPS showed an RMSE of 0.08-0.18 mm in relation to geometric accuracy. CAD-based implants showed an RMSE of 0.50-1.25 mm. RMSE in relation to implant thickness was between 0.63 and 0.70 mm (TPS) while values for CAD-based implants were significantly higher (0.63-1.67 mm). While both approaches provide implants showing a high accuracy, the TPS-based approach additionally provides implants that accurately reproduce the patient-specific thickness distribution of the affected cranial region.
基于计算机断层扫描 (CT) 数据的计算机辅助设计 (CAD) 技术已广泛应用于生成患者特定植入物。然而,目前仍存在一些设计过程复杂和重建协议僵化等问题,例如用于模仿特定患者颅骨缺失厚度分布的定制植入物。在本研究中,我们使用两种不同的方法,即 CAD 方法和薄板样条(TPS)方法,在三个临床病例中重建了广泛的单侧和双侧颅骨缺损。我们使用了三个完整人类颅骨的 CT 数据,这些颅骨是根据临床病例中的缺失区域进行虚拟损伤的。总共进行了 132 次虚拟重建,并从原始植入物到生成的植入物的准确性进行了量化,以及在生成的植入物厚度方面的偏差,使用均方根误差(RMSE)进行量化。与几何精度相比,TPS 重建的 RMSE 为 0.08-0.18 毫米。基于 CAD 的植入物的 RMSE 为 0.50-1.25 毫米。与植入物厚度相关的 RMSE 为 0.63-0.70 毫米(TPS),而基于 CAD 的植入物的值明显更高(0.63-1.67 毫米)。虽然这两种方法都提供了具有高精度的植入物,但 TPS 方法还提供了能够准确复制受影响颅骨区域特定厚度分布的植入物。