• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越设计的责任:医生对医疗 AI 的伦理要求。

Responsibility beyond design: Physicians' requirements for ethical medical AI.

机构信息

TU Delft, Faculty of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2022 Feb;36(2):162-169. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12887. Epub 2021 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1111/bioe.12887
PMID:34089625
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9291936/
Abstract

Medical AI is increasingly being developed and tested to improve medical diagnosis, prediction and treatment of a wide array of medical conditions. Despite worries about the explainability and accuracy of such medical AI systems, it is reasonable to assume that they will be increasingly implemented in medical practice. Current ethical debates focus mainly on design requirements and suggest embedding certain values such as transparency, fairness, and explainability in the design of medical AI systems. Aside from concerns about their design, medical AI systems also raise questions with regard to physicians' responsibilities once these technologies are being implemented and used. How do physicians' responsibilities change with the implementation of medical AI? Which set of competencies do physicians have to learn to responsibly interact with medical AI? In the present article, we will introduce the notion of forward-looking responsibility and enumerate through this conceptual lens a number of competencies and duties that physicians ought to employ to responsibly utilize medical AI in practice. Those include amongst others understanding the range of reasonable outputs, being aware of own experience and skill decline, and monitoring potential accuracy decline of the AI systems.

摘要

医疗人工智能技术正日益发展和测试,以改善对各种医疗状况的诊断、预测和治疗。尽管人们对这类医疗人工智能系统的可解释性和准确性存在担忧,但可以合理地假设,它们将越来越多地在医疗实践中得到应用。目前的伦理争论主要集中在设计要求上,并建议在医疗人工智能系统的设计中嵌入某些价值观,如透明度、公平性和可解释性。除了对其设计的担忧之外,医疗人工智能系统在这些技术得到实施和使用后,也引发了关于医生责任的问题。随着医疗人工智能的实施,医生的责任发生了哪些变化?医生需要学习哪些能力来负责任地与医疗人工智能互动?在本文中,我们将介绍前瞻性责任的概念,并通过这一概念视角列举出一些医生在实践中需要采用的能力和职责,以负责任地利用医疗人工智能。这些能力和职责包括理解合理输出的范围、了解自身经验和技能的下降以及监测人工智能系统的潜在准确性下降等。

相似文献

1
Responsibility beyond design: Physicians' requirements for ethical medical AI.超越设计的责任:医生对医疗 AI 的伦理要求。
Bioethics. 2022 Feb;36(2):162-169. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12887. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
2
Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.人工智能在医疗保健中的公平性:综述与建议。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Jan;42(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01474-3. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
3
Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective.人工智能在医疗保健中的可解释性:多学科视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6.
4
Physicians' required competencies in AI-assisted clinical settings: a systematic review.人工智能辅助临床环境中医师所需的能力:一项系统综述。
Br Med Bull. 2025 Jan 16;153(1). doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldae025.
5
Efficacy of Artificial-Intelligence-Driven Differential-Diagnosis List on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Physicians: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Study.人工智能驱动的鉴别诊断清单对医生诊断准确性的影响:一项开放标签随机对照研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 21;18(4):2086. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042086.
6
Future Medical Artificial Intelligence Application Requirements and Expectations of Physicians in German University Hospitals: Web-Based Survey.德国大学医院的未来医学人工智能应用要求和医生期望:基于网络的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 5;23(3):e26646. doi: 10.2196/26646.
7
Multi Scale Ethics-Why We Need  to Consider the Ethics of AI in Healthcare at Different Scales.多尺度伦理——为何我们需要在不同尺度上考虑医疗 AI 的伦理问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Nov 28;28(6):63. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00396-z.
8
Evaluating the understanding of the ethical and moral challenges of Big Data and AI among Jordanian medical students, physicians in training, and senior practitioners: a cross-sectional study.评估约旦医学生、培训医师和高级从业者对大数据和人工智能伦理道德挑战的理解:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Feb 17;25(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01008-0.
9
Ethical and Legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Medicine.人工智能在核医学中的伦理和法律挑战。
Semin Nucl Med. 2021 Mar;51(2):120-125. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
10
Facilitating Trust Calibration in Artificial Intelligence-Driven Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Determining Physicians' Diagnostic Accuracy: Quasi-Experimental Study.促进人工智能驱动的诊断决策支持系统中信任校准以确定医生的诊断准确性:准实验研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 27;8:e58666. doi: 10.2196/58666.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Medical Explainable Artificial Intelligence on Nurses' Innovation Behaviour: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach.医学可解释人工智能对护士创新行为的影响:一种结构方程建模方法。
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Sep 26;2024:8885760. doi: 10.1155/2024/8885760. eCollection 2024.
2
Challenges and Limitations of Human Oversight in Ethical Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Health Care: Balancing Digital Literacy and Professional Strain.医疗保健领域中道德人工智能实施中人为监督的挑战与局限:平衡数字素养与职业压力
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024 Sep 7;2(4):559-563. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.08.004. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Effective Recruitment or Bot Attack? The Challenge of Internet-Based Research Surveys and Recommendations to Reduce Risk and Improve Robustness.有效招募还是机器人攻击?基于互联网的研究调查面临的挑战以及降低风险和提高稳健性的建议。
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Mar 14;14:e60548. doi: 10.2196/60548.
4
Physicians' required competencies in AI-assisted clinical settings: a systematic review.人工智能辅助临床环境中医师所需的能力:一项系统综述。
Br Med Bull. 2025 Jan 16;153(1). doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldae025.
5
From responsibility to responsibilization in stem cell research: An ethical framework.从干细胞研究中的责任到责任化:一个伦理框架。
Stem Cell Reports. 2025 Feb 11;20(2):102389. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.102389. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
6
The impact of digital health technologies on moral responsibility: a scoping review.数字健康技术对道德责任的影响:一项范围综述
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Mar;28(1):17-31. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10238-3. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
7
Clinicians' roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students.临床医生在使用人工智能方面的角色和必要的理解水平:一项对德国医学生的定性访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 7;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01109-w.
8
Impacts of Clinical Decision Support Systems on the Relationship, Communication, and Shared Decision-Making Between Health Care Professionals and Patients: Multistakeholder Interview Study.临床决策支持系统对医疗保健专业人员和患者之间的关系、沟通和共享决策的影响:多利益相关者访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 23;26:e55717. doi: 10.2196/55717.
9
Non-empirical methods for ethics research on digital technologies in medicine, health care and public health: a systematic journal review.非经验方法在医学、医疗保健和公共卫生领域数字技术伦理研究中的应用:系统期刊评价。
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Dec;27(4):513-528. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10222-x. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
10
AI-Assisted Decision-Making in Long-Term Care: Qualitative Study on Prerequisites for Responsible Innovation.人工智能在长期护理中的决策辅助:负责任创新的先决条件定性研究。
JMIR Nurs. 2024 Jul 25;7:e55962. doi: 10.2196/55962.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension.涉及人工智能干预的临床试验方案指南:SPIRIT-AI 扩展。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Oct;2(10):e549-e560. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30219-3. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
The four dimensions of contestable AI diagnostics - A patient-centric approach to explainable AI.可争辩 AI 诊断的四个维度 - 以患者为中心的可解释 AI 方法。
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Jul;107:101901. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101901. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
3
Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies.人工智能与临床医生:深度学习研究的设计、报告标准和主张的系统评价。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 25;368:m689. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m689.
4
Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.利用活检进行前列腺癌 Gleason 分级的自动化深度学习系统:一项诊断研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):233-241. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30739-9. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
5
Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability.人工智能、责任归因与可解释性的关系论证
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):2051-2068. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00146-8. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
6
Artificial intelligence powers digital medicine.人工智能推动数字医学发展。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Mar 14;1:5. doi: 10.1038/s41746-017-0012-2. eCollection 2018.
7
Adversarial attacks on medical machine learning.对医学机器学习的对抗攻击。
Science. 2019 Mar 22;363(6433):1287-1289. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw4399.
8
Are Current Tort Liability Doctrines Adequate for Addressing Injury Caused by AI?当前的侵权责任原则是否足以应对人工智能造成的伤害?
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Feb 1;21(2):E160-166. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.160.
9
Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety.人工智能、偏差与临床安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):231-237. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008370. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
10
Deep learning for lung cancer prognostication: A retrospective multi-cohort radiomics study.深度学习在肺癌预后预测中的应用:一项回顾性多队列放射组学研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 30;15(11):e1002711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002711. eCollection 2018 Nov.