Arsi University College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, P. O. Box, 04, Assela, Ethiopia.
École Nationale Vétérinaire, Agroalimentaire et de L'alimentation, Nantes-Atlantique, BIOEPAR (UMR1300 INRA/ONIRIS), Atlanpole-Chantrerie CS-40706 44307, Nantes Cedex 3, France.
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 5;21(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06088-6.
Reports on the effects of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors on the clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) have been conflicting. We performed this meta-analysis to find conclusive evidence.
We searched published articles through PubMed, EMBASE and medRxiv from 5 January 2020 to 3 August 2020. Studies that reported clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19, stratified by the class of antihypertensives, were included. Random and fixed-effects models were used to estimate pooled odds ratio (OR).
A total 36 studies involving 30,795 patients with COVID-19 were included. The overall risk of poor patient outcomes (severe COVID-19 or death) was lower in patients taking RAAS inhibitors (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: [0.67, 0.95]) compared with those receiving non-RAAS inhibitor antihypertensives. However, further sub-meta-analysis showed that specific RAAS inhibitors did not show a reduction of poor COVID-19 outcomes when compared with any class of antihypertensive except beta-blockers (BBs). For example, compared to calcium channel blockers (CCBs), neither angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: [0.67, 1.23]) nor angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) (OR = 0.90, 95% CI: [0.62, 1.33]) showed a reduction of poor COVID-19 outcomes. When compared with BBs, however, both ACEIs (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: [0.73, 0.99) and ARBs (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: [0.55, 0.94]) showed an apparent decrease in poor COVID-19 outcomes.
RAAS inhibitors did not increase the risk of mortality or severity of COVID-19. Differences in COVID-19 clinical outcomes between different class of antihypertensive drugs were likely due to the underlying comorbidities for which the antihypertensive drugs were prescribed, although adverse effects of drugs such as BBs could not be excluded.
关于肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)抑制剂对冠状病毒病 19(COVID-19)临床结局的影响的报告存在争议。我们进行了这项荟萃分析以寻找确凿的证据。
我们通过 PubMed、EMBASE 和 medRxiv 从 2020 年 1 月 5 日至 2020 年 8 月 3 日搜索了已发表的文章。纳入了报告 COVID-19 患者临床结局的研究,并按抗高血压药物的类别进行分层。使用随机和固定效应模型来估计汇总优势比(OR)。
共纳入 36 项涉及 30795 例 COVID-19 患者的研究。与接受非 RAAS 抑制剂降压药的患者相比,服用 RAAS 抑制剂的患者(OR=0.79,95%CI:[0.67,0.95])不良患者结局(严重 COVID-19 或死亡)的风险较低。然而,进一步的亚组分析表明,与除β受体阻滞剂(BBs)以外的任何一类降压药相比,特定的 RAAS 抑制剂并未显示出降低 COVID-19 不良结局的作用。例如,与钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)相比,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)(OR=0.91,95%CI:[0.67,1.23])和血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARBs)(OR=0.90,95%CI:[0.62,1.33])均未显示出降低 COVID-19 不良结局的作用。然而,与 BBs 相比,ACEIs(OR=0.85,95%CI:[0.73,0.99)和 ARBs(OR=0.72,95%CI:[0.55,0.94))均显示出 COVID-19 不良结局明显减少。
RAAS 抑制剂不会增加 COVID-19 患者的死亡率或严重程度。不同类别的降压药对 COVID-19 临床结局的影响差异可能是由于所开降压药的潜在合并症所致,尽管不能排除 BB 等药物的不良反应。