Suppr超能文献

多黏菌素与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科细菌感染。

Colistin Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Department of Biostatistics and the Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(2):163-171. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix783.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam-a cephalosporin-β-lactamase inhibitor combination with in vitro activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-compared with colistin remains unknown.

METHODS

Patients initially treated with either ceftazidime-avibactam or colistin for CRE infections were selected from the Consortium on Resistance Against Carbapenems in Klebsiella and other Enterobacteriaceae (CRACKLE), a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Efficacy, safety, and benefit-risk analyses were performed using intent-to-treat analyses with partial credit and the desirability of outcome ranking approaches. The ordinal efficacy outcome was based on disposition at day 30 after starting treatment (home vs not home but not observed to die in the hospital vs hospital death). All analyses were adjusted for confounding using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were treated first with ceftazidime-avibactam and 99 with colistin. Most patients received additional anti-CRE agents as part of their treatment. Bloodstream (n = 63; 46%) and respiratory (n = 30; 22%) infections were most common. In patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam versus colistin, IPTW-adjusted all-cause hospital mortality 30 days after starting treatment was 9% versus 32%, respectively (difference, 23%; 95% bootstrap confidence interval, 9%-35%; P = .001). In an analysis of disposition at 30 days, patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam, compared with those treated within colistin, had an IPTW-adjusted probability of a better outcome of 64% (95% confidence interval, 57%-71%). Partial credit analyses indicated uniform superiority of ceftazidime-avibactam to colistin.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftazidime-avibactam may be a reasonable alternative to colistin in the treatment of K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing CRE infections. These findings require confirmation in a randomized controlled trial.

摘要

背景

头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(一种头孢菌素-β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合)与多粘菌素在体外对产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)的疗效比较,其疗效仍不清楚。

方法

从抗碳青霉烯类药物的克雷伯氏菌和肠杆菌科(CRACKLE)联盟的一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究中,选择最初接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦或多粘菌素治疗 CRE 感染的患者。采用意向治疗分析、部分信用和结果排序方法的期望性进行疗效、安全性和风险效益分析。序效终点是治疗开始后第 30 天的转归(居家而非住院但未观察到死亡/住院死亡)。所有分析均使用治疗逆概率加权(IPTW)进行混杂因素调整。

结果

38 例患者最初接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗,99 例患者接受多粘菌素治疗。大多数患者接受了额外的抗 CRE 药物作为其治疗的一部分。血流(n = 63;46%)和呼吸道(n = 30;22%)感染最为常见。在接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗与多粘菌素治疗的患者中,治疗开始后 30 天的全因住院死亡率分别为 9%和 32%(差异为 23%;95% bootstrap 置信区间为 9%-35%;P =.001)。在 30 天转归分析中,与接受多粘菌素治疗的患者相比,接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗的患者,其结局更好的 IPTW 调整概率为 64%(95%置信区间,57%-71%)。部分信用分析表明头孢他啶-阿维巴坦明显优于多粘菌素。

结论

头孢他啶-阿维巴坦可能是治疗产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科细菌感染的一种合理替代多粘菌素的药物。这些发现需要在随机对照试验中得到证实。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Methods and issues in studies of CRE.耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌研究中的方法和问题。
Virulence. 2017 May 19;8(4):453-459. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1213473. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
10
Comment: Fundamentals and Innovation in Antibiotic Trials.评论:抗生素试验的基本原理与创新
Stat Biopharm Res. 2015;7(4):331-336. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2015.1094406. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验