Suppr超能文献

正电子发射断层扫描(PET)鉴别真性胶质瘤进展与治疗后相关变化的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Diagnostic Accuracy of PET for Differentiating True Glioma Progression From Post Treatment-Related Changes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Cui Meng, Zorrilla-Veloz Rocío Isabel, Hu Jian, Guan Bing, Ma Xiaodong

机构信息

Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, The First Medical Centre of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 May 20;12:671867. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.671867. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PET with different radiotracers and parameters in differentiating between true glioma progression (TPR) and post treatment-related change (PTRC). Studies on using PET to differentiate between TPR and PTRC were screened from the PubMed and Embase databases. By following the PRISMA checklist, the quality assessment of included studies was performed, the true positive and negative values (TP and TN), false positive and negative values (FP and FN), and general characteristics of all the included studies were extracted. Results of PET consistent with reference standard were defined as TP or TN. The pooled sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves (HSROC) were generated to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. The 33 included studies had 1,734 patients with 1,811 lesions suspected of glioma recurrence. Fifteen studies tested the accuracy of F-FET PET, 12 tested F-FDG PET, seven tested C-MET PET, and three tested F-DOPA PET. F-FET PET showed a pooled Sen and Spe of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.93) and 0.78 (0.69, 0.85), respectively. In the subgroup analysis of FET-PET, diagnostic accuracy of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) was higher than that of mixed-grade gliomas ( = 0.04). F-FDG PET showed a pooled Sen and Spe of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.83) and 0.87 (0.80, 0.92), the Spe of the HGGs group was lower than that of the low-grade gliomas group (0.82 vs. 0.90, = 0.02). C-MET PET had a pooled Sen and Spe of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.96) and 0.78 (0.69, 0.86). F-DOPA PET had a pooled Sen and Spe of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.89) and 0.70 (0.60, 0.79). FET-PET combined with MRI had a pooled Sen and Spe of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.94) and 0.76 (0.57, 0.88). Multi-parameters analysis of FET-PET had pooled Sen and Spe values of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.92) and 0.79 (0.63, 0.89). PET has a moderate diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between TPR and PTRC. The high Sen of amino acid PET and high Spe of FDG-PET suggest that the combination of commonly used FET-PET and FDG-PET may be more accurate and promising, especially for low-grade glioma.

摘要

评估使用不同放射性示踪剂和参数的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在鉴别真性胶质瘤进展(TPR)和治疗后相关变化(PTRC)方面的诊断准确性。从PubMed和Embase数据库中筛选关于使用PET鉴别TPR和PTRC的研究。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单,对纳入研究进行质量评估,提取所有纳入研究的真阳性和阴性值(TP和TN)、假阳性和阴性值(FP和FN)以及一般特征。将与参考标准一致的PET结果定义为TP或TN。生成合并敏感度(Sen)、特异度(Spe)和分层汇总受试者工作特征曲线(HSROC)以评估诊断准确性。33项纳入研究中有1734例患者,共1811个疑似胶质瘤复发的病灶。15项研究测试了¹⁸F-氟代乙基酪氨酸(F-FET)PET的准确性,12项测试了¹⁸F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖(F-FDG)PET,7项测试了¹¹C-蛋氨酸(C-MET)PET,3项测试了¹⁸F-多巴(F-DOPA)PET。F-FET PET的合并Sen和Spe分别为0.88(95%CI:0.80,0.93)和0.78(0.69,0.85)。在FET-PET的亚组分析中,高级别胶质瘤(HGGs)的诊断准确性高于混合级别胶质瘤(P = 0.04)。F-FDG PET的合并Sen和Spe分别为0.78(95%CI:0.71,0.83)和0.87(0.80,0.92),HGGs组的Spe低于低级别胶质瘤组(分别为0.82和0.90,P = 0.02)。C-MET PET的合并Sen和Spe分别为0.92(95%CI:0.83,0.96)和0.78(0.69,0.86)。F-DOPA PET的合并Sen和Spe分别为0.85(95%CI:0.80,0.89)和0.70(0.60,0.79)。FET-PET联合磁共振成像(MRI)的合并Sen和Spe分别为0.88(95%CI:0.78,0.94)和0.76(0.57,0.88)。FET-PET的多参数分析的合并Sen和Spe值分别为0.88(95%CI:0.81,0.92)和0.79(0.63,0.89)。PET在鉴别TPR和PTRC方面具有中等诊断准确性。氨基酸PET的高Sen和FDG-PET的高Spe表明,常用的FET-PET和FDG-PET联合使用可能更准确且有前景,尤其是对于低级别胶质瘤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7613/8173157/028750f42f50/fneur-12-671867-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验