Cubells-Serra Jenny, Sánchez-Sicilia Alejandro, Astudillo-Mendoza Priscila, Escandón-Nagel Neli, Baeza-Rivera María José
Departamento de Psicología Social, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Departamento de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco, Chile.
Front Sociol. 2021 May 20;6:621646. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.621646. eCollection 2021.
Romantic love promotes and lays the foundation for the development of hegemonic affective sex relationships, guiding the normative ways of feeling and experiencing love. This way of conceiving love is an intrinsic part of women's subordination, and it entails a greater tolerance for situations of violence in sex-affective relationships in which the exercise of asymmetric power relations between men and women is legitimized. With the current advent of the postmodern stage, a wide variety of dissident (non-heterosexual) sexual orientations with heterosexual hegemony have been given greater visibility and legitimacy, and new ways of relating to sex affectively have emerged initially opposed to traditional romantic discourse, the fundamental pillar of monogamy. The aim of the present work was to study whether these different ways of linking us and understanding affective sex relations marked a significant difference with respect to the heterosexual monogamous hegemonic model in the assumption of the mythified ideas of romantic love. Therefore, we studied the relationship between sex, sexual orientation, and the type of sex-affective relationship (monogamous or non-monogamous by consensus) in the assumption of the myths of romantic love. For this purpose, an instrument that showed appropriate psychometric properties was created, and a cross-sectional study was carried out with a sample of 1,235 people who completed a self-administered online questionnaire. The results indicated that there were no significant differences according to sex, but there were differences in sexual orientation and type of relationship. It may be concluded that a person, regardless of sex, heterosexual or homosexual, monogamous or who has never had affective sex relations, will have a significantly greater probability of assuming the myths of romantic love than a person with a sexual orientation other than heterosexual or homosexual and who is in a non-monogamous consensual relationship.
浪漫爱情促进并奠定了霸权情感性关系发展的基础，引导着感受和体验爱情的规范方式。这种对爱情的理解方式是女性从属地位的内在组成部分，它意味着对性情感关系中暴力情况有更大的容忍度，在这种关系中男女之间不对称权力关系的行使被合法化。随着后现代阶段的到来，各种与异性恋霸权相对的（非异性恋）性取向获得了更高的可见度和合法性，并且出现了最初与传统浪漫话语相对的新的情感性联系方式，而传统浪漫话语是一夫一妻制的基本支柱。本研究的目的是探讨这些不同的联系我们和理解情感性关系的方式，在对浪漫爱情神话观念的假设上，与异性恋一夫一妻制霸权模式相比是否存在显著差异。因此，我们研究了在浪漫爱情神话假设下，性别、性取向和性情感关系类型（经双方同意的一夫一妻制或非一夫一妻制）之间的关系。为此，创建了一个具有适当心理测量特性的工具，并对1235人进行了横断面研究，这些人完成了一份在线自填问卷。结果表明，根据性别没有显著差异，但在性取向和关系类型上存在差异。可以得出结论，一个人，无论性别、异性恋或同性恋、一夫一妻制或从未有过情感性关系，与具有非异性恋或同性恋性取向且处于非一夫一妻制双方同意关系中的人相比，将有显著更高的概率接受浪漫爱情的神话。
