Suppr超能文献

功能性视觉测试在多种模拟条件下检测细微变化的敏感性和稳定性。

Sensitivity and Stability of Functional Vision Tests in Detecting Subtle Changes Under Multiple Simulated Conditions.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Jun 1;10(7):7. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.7.7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore whether subtle changes in visual quality can be detected using different measures of visual function against the quick contrast sensitivity function test (quick CSF).

METHODS

Sixty participants, aged 17 to 34 years, were enrolled. Participants' vision was degraded by 0.25 D undercorrection (0.25 D), 60% neutral density filter brightness reduction (60% ND), and 0.8 Bangerter foil optical diffusion (0.8BAN). Visual function tests including visual acuity and contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000E and quick CSF) were measured with participant's best-corrected vision and under simulated visual degradation conditions. Test sensitivities in detecting differences were compared.

RESULTS

Statistically significant visual acuity degradation was observed in the 0.8BAN condition only (Pcorrected < 0.001). With CSV-1000E and outliers removed, significant CS degradation was observed in all spatial frequencies, area under log CSF (AULCSF) in the 0.8BAN condition (Pcorrected < 0.001 for all), medium and high spatial frequencies and AULCSF in the 60%ND condition (Pcorrected,6cpd = 0.002, Pcorrected,12cpd = 0.005, Pcorrected,18cpd = 0.001, Pcorrected,AULCSF < 0.001) and the 0.25 D condition (Pcorrected,6cpd = 0.011, Pcorrected,12cpd = 0.013, Pcorrected,18cpd = 0.015, Pcorrected,AULCSF < 0.001). With the quick CSF, significant CS degradation was observed in all simulated visual conditions in all spatial frequencies, cutoff frequency and AULCSF (Pcorrected < 0.001 for all). Test-retest reliability of the quick CSF method was high; coefficient of repeatability ranged from 0.14 to 0.18 logCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with visual acuity and chart-based CS tests, the quick CSF method provided more reliable and sensitive measures to detect small visual changes.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

The quick CSF method can provide sensitive and reliable measures to monitor disease progression and assess treatment outcomes.

摘要

目的

探讨不同视觉功能测量方法(快速对比敏感度功能测试(quick CSF))是否可以检测到视觉质量的细微变化。

方法

共纳入 60 名年龄在 17 至 34 岁的参与者。通过 0.25 屈光度欠矫(0.25D)、60%中性密度滤光片亮度降低(60%ND)和 0.8Bangerter 箔光学漫射(0.8BAN)将参与者的视力降低。使用参与者最佳矫正视力和模拟视觉降低条件测量了视觉功能测试,包括视力和对比敏感度(CSV-1000E 和 quick CSF)。比较了检测差异的测试敏感性。

结果

仅在 0.8BAN 条件下观察到统计学显著的视力矫正下降(P<0.001)。使用 CSV-1000E 并排除离群值后,在所有空间频率下均观察到显著的 CS 降低,在 0.8BAN 条件下的对数 CS 下面积(AULCSF)(所有 P<0.001)、中高空间频率和 AULCSF 在 60%ND 条件下(P<0.001,P<0.001,P<0.001)和 0.25D 条件下(P<0.001,P<0.001,P<0.001,P<0.001)。使用快速 CSF,在所有模拟视觉条件下,在所有空间频率、截止频率和 AULCSF 中均观察到显著的 CS 降低(所有 P<0.001)。快速 CSF 方法的测试-重测信度较高;重复性系数范围为 0.14 至 0.18 logCS。

结论

与视力和图表对比敏感度测试相比,快速 CSF 方法提供了更可靠和敏感的措施来检测微小的视觉变化。

翻译是否准确可以根据具体情况进行调整,如需更准确的翻译,请提供更多上下文信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a2e/8196408/6ab16b753071/tvst-10-7-7-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验