Advanced Bionics (Asia Pacific), Sydney, Australia.
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Int J Audiol. 2022 Apr;61(4):293-300. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1930206. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
Adult cochlear implant (CI) candidates seeking to make an informed decision about cochlear implantation can find themselves needing to quickly understand large volumes of complex information provided by different professionals in different formats. This study investigates the suitability, within a health literacy context, of one of those sources of information: the CI brochure.
A single-observation design.
Thirty English passages of approximately 100-words each were sampled from 15 sections of seven CI brochures. All brochures were readily available to the general public on the Australian websites of four CI manufacturers at the time of the analysis (June 2019).
Analyses by two examiners using the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) classified all 15 sections from all seven CI brochures as being "not suitable" for general, adult readers. Analyses by the same examiners using four readability formulae (Flesch Reading Ease Scale, Fry Readability Graph, Flesch-Kincaid Readability Formula, and the Fog index) showed sampled passages from the 15 sections were written at a level best suited for persons with 10 to 14 years of schooling.
Brochures intended for adult CI candidates should be revised to improve their suitability and readability for adult CI candidates. Specific recommendations are suggested.
寻求做出明智的人工耳蜗植入(CI)决策的成年 CI 候选者可能会发现自己需要快速理解不同专业人员以不同格式提供的大量复杂信息。本研究调查了其中一种信息来源(CI 手册)在健康素养背景下的适用性。
单次观察设计。
从七个 CI 手册的 15 个部分中随机抽取了 30 篇约 100-100 字的英文段落。在分析时(2019 年 6 月),四个 CI 制造商的澳大利亚网站上随时向公众提供所有手册。
两位考官使用材料适宜性评估(SAM)进行的分析将来自七个 CI 手册的所有 15 个部分都归类为不适合普通成年读者。同样的考官使用四种可读性公式(Flesch 阅读舒适度、Fry 阅读图表、Flesch-Kincaid 阅读公式和 Fog 指数)进行的分析表明,来自 15 个部分的抽样段落的写作水平最适合具有 10 至 14 年受教育程度的人。
应修改针对成年 CI 候选者的手册,以提高其对成年 CI 候选者的适用性和可读性。建议提出了具体建议。