• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估参与认知刺激活动的痴呆症患者:一项定性试点视频分析,探索促进参与的重要性。

Assessing people with dementia participating in cognitive stimulation activities-A qualitative pilot video analysis exploring the importance of facilitating the participation.

机构信息

University College Northern Denmark, Aalborg Oest, Denmark.

University of Northampton, Northampton, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1524-1534. doi: 10.1111/hex.13300. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13300
PMID:34114709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8369123/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This pilot video analysis was part of a feasibility control study, which aimed to gain information about the size and variability of the changes in outcome measures to plan a substantive effect study. It compared a cognitive stimulation programme named Lifelong Learning with other existing dementia services.

OBJECTIVE

The pilot video analysis explored how facilitation is performed, when assessing people with dementia with standardized measures, to ensure their participation in research.

DESIGN

A test battery of five measures (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease Scale (QoL-AD), General Self-Efficacy Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and Hawthorn Friendship Scale) was used. Each assessment was video-recorded. The findings from a microanalysis of 10 videos are presented in this article.

SETTING

The study involved 55 active participants with mild-to-moderate dementia in six municipalities in Northern Denmark.

RESULTS

The identified themes related to supportive facilitation: Positive facilitator strategies; Creating a safe and comfortable environment; and to dilemmas in facilitation: Balancing multiple dilemmas and Balancing the MMSE test.

DISCUSSION

Results are discussed in relation to using standardized measures.

CONCLUSION

The quality of facilitation when using standardized measures is of great importance as it may influence the participant, the assessment and the answers given. The facilitation role needs to be thoroughly planned and executed with ethical consideration to improve the participation of vulnerable groups in research and ensure a person-centred approach.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The identified measures were chosen based upon previous qualitative results and user-involvement workshops with people with dementia.

摘要

背景

本视频分析试点是可行性控制研究的一部分,旨在获取有关结局测量变化的大小和可变性的信息,以计划进行实质性效果研究。它将一项名为终身学习的认知刺激计划与其他现有的痴呆症服务进行了比较。

目的

试点视频分析旨在探讨如何在使用标准化措施评估痴呆症患者时进行促进,以确保他们参与研究。

设计

使用了一套五项措施(简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、阿尔茨海默病生活质量量表(QoL-AD)、一般自我效能感量表、罗森伯格自尊量表和霍桑友谊量表)的测试组合。每次评估都进行了录像。本文介绍了对 10 个视频进行微观分析的结果。

地点

该研究涉及丹麦北部六个市的 55 名轻度至中度痴呆症的活跃参与者。

结果

确定的主题涉及支持性促进:积极的促进策略;营造安全舒适的环境;以及促进中的困境:平衡多个困境和平衡 MMSE 测试。

讨论

结果与使用标准化措施有关。

结论

使用标准化措施进行促进的质量非常重要,因为它可能会影响参与者、评估和给出的答案。需要仔细计划和执行促进作用,并考虑到伦理问题,以提高弱势群体在研究中的参与度,并确保以患者为中心的方法。

患者或公众贡献

选择了已确定的措施,这些措施是基于以前的定性结果和与痴呆症患者一起进行的用户参与研讨会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d020/8369123/022b5ba18d1c/HEX-24-1524-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d020/8369123/022b5ba18d1c/HEX-24-1524-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d020/8369123/022b5ba18d1c/HEX-24-1524-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing people with dementia participating in cognitive stimulation activities-A qualitative pilot video analysis exploring the importance of facilitating the participation.评估参与认知刺激活动的痴呆症患者:一项定性试点视频分析,探索促进参与的重要性。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1524-1534. doi: 10.1111/hex.13300. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
2
Goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for early-stage Alzheimer's and related dementias: the GREAT RCT.以目标为导向的认知康复治疗早期阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆: GREAT RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(10):1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta23100.
3
4
A feasibility and pilot study of a "lifelong learning" intervention for people with dementia.一项针对痴呆症患者的“终身学习”干预措施的可行性和试点研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 May 1;10(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01493-5.
5
Observations on strategies used by people with dementia to manage being assessed using validated measures: A pilot qualitative video analysis.痴呆症患者使用策略管理经验证的评估工具的观察:一项试点定性视频分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):931-939. doi: 10.1111/hex.13719. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
6
An intervention to promote self-management, independence and self-efficacy in people with early-stage dementia: the Journeying through Dementia RCT.促进早期痴呆症患者自我管理、独立和自我效能感的干预措施:Journeying through Dementia RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 May;26(24):1-152. doi: 10.3310/KHHA0861.
7
Cognitive stimulation therapy in the Italian context: its efficacy in cognitive and non-cognitive measures in older adults with dementia.认知刺激疗法在意大利语境下的应用:对老年痴呆症患者认知和非认知指标的疗效。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;32(3):331-340. doi: 10.1002/gps.4521. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
8
The impact of individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (iCST) on cognition, quality of life, caregiver health, and family relationships in dementia: A randomised controlled trial.个体认知刺激疗法(iCST)对痴呆症患者认知、生活质量、照料者健康及家庭关系的影响:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2017 Mar 28;14(3):e1002269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002269. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
10
Individual cognitive stimulation therapy for dementia: a clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.针对痴呆症的个体认知刺激疗法:一项临床疗效及成本效益的实用、多中心、随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Aug;19(64):1-108. doi: 10.3310/hta19640.

引用本文的文献

1
A feasibility and pilot study of a "lifelong learning" intervention for people with dementia.一项针对痴呆症患者的“终身学习”干预措施的可行性和试点研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 May 1;10(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01493-5.
2
Observations on strategies used by people with dementia to manage being assessed using validated measures: A pilot qualitative video analysis.痴呆症患者使用策略管理经验证的评估工具的观察:一项试点定性视频分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):931-939. doi: 10.1111/hex.13719. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Journey of ethics - Conducting collaborative research with people with dementia.伦理之旅——与痴呆症患者合作开展研究。
Dementia (London). 2021 Apr;20(3):1005-1024. doi: 10.1177/1471301220919887. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
2
What is important to people living with dementia?: the 'long-list' of outcome items in the development of a core outcome set for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community-based health and social care interventions.对患有痴呆症的人来说重要的是什么?:在开发用于评估非药物性基于社区的健康和社会护理干预措施的核心结局集的过程中,“长列表”结局指标。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 27;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1103-5.
3
Involving people living with dementia in research: an accessible modified Delphi survey for core outcome set development.
让痴呆症患者参与研究:一项用于核心结局集开发的可及性改良德尔菲调查。
Trials. 2019 Jan 6;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3069-6.
4
The Balanced Participation Model: Sharing opportunities for giving people with early-stage dementia a voice in research.平衡参与模式:为早期痴呆症患者提供在研究中发声的机会。
Dementia (London). 2020 Oct;19(7):2294-2313. doi: 10.1177/1471301218820208. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
5
Non-Pharmacologic Interventions for Persons with Dementia.针对痴呆症患者的非药物干预措施。
Mo Med. 2017 Mar-Apr;114(2):116-119.
6
A visual and creative approach to exploring people with dementia's experiences of being students at a school in Denmark.一种视觉和创造性的方法,用于探索患有痴呆症的人在丹麦一所学校当学生的经历。
Dementia (London). 2020 Apr;19(3):786-804. doi: 10.1177/1471301218786636. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
7
Going back to school - An opportunity for lifelong learning for people with dementia in Denmark (Innovative practice).重返校园——丹麦痴呆症患者终身学习的机会(创新实践)。
Dementia (London). 2020 Oct;19(7):2461-2468. doi: 10.1177/1471301218763190. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
8
The emotional challenges of conducting in-depth research into significant health issues in health geography: reflections on emotional labour, fieldwork and life course.健康地理学中对重大健康问题进行深入研究的情感挑战:关于情感劳动、实地调查和生命历程的思考
Area (Oxf). 2017 Dec;49(4):436-442. doi: 10.1111/area.12347. Epub 2017 May 9.
9
Researcher Self-Care in Emotionally Demanding Research: A Proposed Conceptual Framework.研究人员在情感要求高的研究中的自我关怀:一个概念性框架的建议。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Mar;28(4):648-658. doi: 10.1177/1049732317746377. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
10
Core outcome measures for interventions to prevent or slow the progress of dementia for people living with mild to moderate dementia: Systematic review and consensus recommendations.针对轻度至中度痴呆症患者预防或延缓痴呆症进展干预措施的核心结局指标:系统评价与共识建议
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179521. eCollection 2017.