• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦理之旅——与痴呆症患者合作开展研究。

Journey of ethics - Conducting collaborative research with people with dementia.

机构信息

University College Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark.

University of Northampton, Northampton, UK.

出版信息

Dementia (London). 2021 Apr;20(3):1005-1024. doi: 10.1177/1471301220919887. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1177/1471301220919887
PMID:32326751
Abstract

This paper explores some of the ethical considerations of working collaboratively with people with dementia within research based upon the experiences, challenges and learning from three doctoral research studies. Focus is on the research relationship with participants and gatekeepers, the importance of setting and access, the power relations within the research and ways in which people with dementia can be supported to be active and have a voice in research. This sits within an ethical framework of principalist ethics and ethics of care to guide not only how research is planned ethically and with consideration of participants, but also how this can support decisions made in situ. The aim is to share, based upon these three studies, ways of managing and working through some of the ethical consideration to support researchers in their decisions in planning and conducting research with people with dementia as active collaborators.

摘要

本文探讨了在基于三项博士研究的经验、挑战和学习的研究中与痴呆症患者合作时的一些伦理考虑因素。重点是研究参与者和守门人的关系,设置和准入的重要性,研究中的权力关系以及如何支持痴呆症患者在研究中积极参与并发表意见。这是在原则伦理学和关怀伦理学的伦理框架内进行的,不仅指导了如何在伦理上计划研究并考虑参与者,还指导了如何在现场支持做出的决策。目的是基于这三项研究,分享一些管理和处理伦理考虑的方法,以支持研究人员在与痴呆症患者作为积极合作者规划和开展研究时做出决策。

相似文献

1
Journey of ethics - Conducting collaborative research with people with dementia.伦理之旅——与痴呆症患者合作开展研究。
Dementia (London). 2021 Apr;20(3):1005-1024. doi: 10.1177/1471301220919887. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
2
Ethical and methodological issues in interviewing persons with dementia.访谈痴呆症患者时的伦理和方法学问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2007 Sep;14(5):608-19. doi: 10.1177/0969733007080206.
3
Sensitive Interviewing in Qualitative Research.定性研究中的敏感性访谈
Res Nurs Health. 2016 Dec;39(6):480-490. doi: 10.1002/nur.21743. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
Challenges in conducting qualitative research with individuals with dementia.对患有痴呆症的个体进行定性研究时面临的挑战。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Jan;2(1):6-11. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20090101-04.
5
Essentials of research ethics for healthcare professionals.医疗保健专业人员的研究伦理要点。
Nurs Health Sci. 2005 Jun;7(2):119-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2005.00216.x.
6
Ethical considerations in phenomenological research.现象学研究中的伦理考量
Nurse Res. 2007;14(3):36-45. doi: 10.7748/nr2007.04.14.3.36.c6031.
7
Ethical and legal aspects of research involving older people with cognitive impairment: A survey of dementia researchers in Australia.涉及认知障碍老年人的研究的伦理和法律方面:澳大利亚痴呆症研究人员的调查。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Jan-Feb;68:101534. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101534. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
8
Ethical challenges in the conduct of qualitative research.定性研究实施中的伦理挑战。
Nurse Res. 2010;18(1):4-7. doi: 10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.4.c8042.
9
Ethically involving students in faculty research.在教师研究中让学生符合道德规范地参与进来。
Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Dec;26(8):705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.021. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
10
Ethical challenges in qualitative research: examples from practice.定性研究中的伦理挑战:实践案例
Nurse Res. 2010;18(1):15-25. doi: 10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.15.c8044.

引用本文的文献

1
Fitting a square peg in a round hole? A mixed-methods study on research ethics and collaborative health and social care research involving 'vulnerable' groups.方枘圆凿?一项关于研究伦理以及涉及“弱势群体”的健康与社会照护合作研究的混合方法研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Apr 1;23(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01290-3.
2
Standardised data collection from people with dementia over the telephone: A qualitative study of the experience of DETERMIND programme researchers in a pandemic.电话中对痴呆症患者进行标准化数据收集:DETERMIND 项目研究人员在大流行期间的经验定性研究。
Dementia (London). 2023 Nov;22(8):1718-1737. doi: 10.1177/14713012231190585. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
3
Developing the CARE intervention to enhance ethical self-efficacy in dementia care through the use of literary texts.
开发 CARE 干预措施,通过使用文学文本提高痴呆症护理中的伦理自我效能。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jun 29;24(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00926-9.
4
Characteristics of dementia-friendly hospitals: an integrative review.痴呆症友好型医院的特征:综合评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 31;22(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03103-6.
5
Association between alcohol and crack: Prevalence, effects, associated factors and experiences of combined use.酒精和快克可卡因的关联:流行率、影响、相关因素和联合使用的体验。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256414. eCollection 2021.
6
Assessing people with dementia participating in cognitive stimulation activities-A qualitative pilot video analysis exploring the importance of facilitating the participation.评估参与认知刺激活动的痴呆症患者:一项定性试点视频分析,探索促进参与的重要性。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1524-1534. doi: 10.1111/hex.13300. Epub 2021 Jun 11.