Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois; Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
J Ren Nutr. 2021 Sep;31(5):512-522. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2020.10.003. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
The prebiotic fiber inulin has been studied in individuals undergoing hemodialysis (HD) due to its ability to reduce gut microbiota-derived uremic toxins. However, studies examining the effects of inulin on the gut microbiota and derived metabolites are limited in these patients. We aimed to assess the impact of a 4-week supplementation of inulin on the gut microbiota composition and microbial metabolites of patients on HD.
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, twelve HD patients (55 ± 10 y, 50% male, 58% Black American, BMI 31.6 ± 8.9 kg/m, 33% diabetes mellitus) were randomized to consume inulin [10 g/d for females; 15 g/d for males] or maltodextrin [6 g/d for females; 9 g/d for males] for 4 weeks, with a 4-week washout period. We assessed the fecal microbiota composition, fecal metabolites (short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), phenols, and indoles), and plasma indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate.
At baseline, factors that explained the gut microbiota variability included BMI category and type of phosphate binder prescribed. Inulin increased the relative abundance of the phylum Verrucomicrobia and its genus Akkermansia (P interaction = 0.045). Inulin and maltodextrin resulted in an increased relative abundance of the phylum Bacteroidetes and its genus Bacteroides (P time = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively). Both treatments increased the fecal acetate and propionate (P time = 0.032 and 0.027, respectively), and there was a trend toward increased fecal butyrate (P time = 0.06). Inulin did not reduce fecal p-cresol or indoles, or plasma concentrations of p-cresyl sulfate or indoxyl sulfate.
A 4-week supplementation of inulin did not lead to major shifts in the fecal microbiota and gut microbiota-derived metabolites. This may be due to high variability among participants and an unexpected increase in fecal excretion of SCFA with maltodextrin. Larger studies are needed to determine the effects of prebiotic fibers on the gut microbiota and clinical outcomes to justify their use in patients on HD.
由于菊粉具有减少肠道微生物群衍生尿毒症毒素的能力,因此已在接受血液透析(HD)的个体中对其进行了研究。然而,在这些患者中,研究菊粉对肠道微生物群及其衍生代谢物的影响的研究有限。我们旨在评估补充 4 周菊粉对 HD 患者肠道微生物群组成和微生物代谢物的影响。
在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究中,将 12 名 HD 患者(55±10 岁,50%为男性,58%为美国黑人,BMI 31.6±8.9kg/m,33%为糖尿病患者)随机分为两组,分别摄入菊粉[女性 10g/d;男性 15g/d]或麦芽糊精[女性 6g/d;男性 9g/d]4 周,然后进行 4 周洗脱期。我们评估了粪便微生物群组成、粪便代谢物(短链脂肪酸(SCFA)、酚类和吲哚)以及血浆吲哚硫酸酯和对甲酚硫酸盐。
在基线时,解释肠道微生物群变异性的因素包括 BMI 类别和开处方的磷酸盐结合剂类型。菊粉增加了厚壁菌门的相对丰度及其阿克曼氏菌属(P 交互=0.045)。菊粉和麦芽糊精导致拟杆菌门及其属拟杆菌的相对丰度增加(P 时间=0.04 和 0.03)。两种处理都增加了粪便乙酸盐和丙酸盐(P 时间=0.032 和 0.027),粪便丁酸盐有增加的趋势(P 时间=0.06)。菊粉并未降低粪便对甲酚或吲哚,或血浆对甲酚硫酸盐或吲哚硫酸酯的浓度。
补充 4 周菊粉并未导致粪便微生物群和肠道微生物群衍生代谢物发生重大变化。这可能是由于参与者之间的高度变异性以及麦芽糊精意外增加了粪便 SCFA 的排泄。需要更大规模的研究来确定益生元纤维对肠道微生物群和临床结局的影响,以证明其在 HD 患者中的使用是合理的。