Negrete Rodney, Simms Samantha, Gross Jacob, Nunes Rabello Lucas, Hixon Matt, Zeini Ibrahim M, Jenkins Walter L, Davies George J
Orlando Health, Orlando, FL.
Georgia Southern University, Savannah, GA.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;16(3):724-731. doi: 10.26603/001c.23677.
Functional training and testing are an important part of a comprehensive rehabilitation program stressing the neuromuscular system in ways that simulate athletic performance to help determine criteria for return to sport. There are numerous single leg hop tests that have been used for these purposes, however, the validity and clinical relevance has been questioned. Many of the functional performance tests assess only the sagittal plane or forward direction and may only partially assess a person's athletic abilities. There is a need for reliable and valid functional tests to assess in a multi-directional manner.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study is to determine the test re-test reliability of a novel multi-directional timed single leg hop test (T-Drill Hop Test) for use in rehabilitation and performance assessments.
Cross-sectional reliability study.
Fifty healthy recreationally active college age subjects, (23 males and 27 females) between the ages of 18 and 35, (mean age 23.48 with SD 3.82) consented to perform the test. The subjects hopped along a 10ft. x 10ft. "T" shaped course. Subjects performed two timed maximum effort trials of the T-Drill Hop Test on each leg with an interval of 3-7 days between the two testing days. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine intersession reliability.
The inter-rater reliability (ICC's) for the entire group of 50 subjects ranged between .98 and 1.00 suggesting excellent reliability. The bilateral comparison, utilizing paired t-tests, of the T-Drill Hop Test demonstrated no significant differences between the time scores for the dominant and non-dominant legs for either males or females (p>.05).
This study demonstrates the T-Drill Hop Test has excellent test re-test reliability. These results are important prior to validation and utilization as a clinical functional performance test.
Level 2.
功能训练与测试是综合康复计划的重要组成部分，该计划通过模拟运动表现的方式对神经肌肉系统施加压力，以帮助确定重返运动的标准。有许多单腿跳测试已被用于这些目的，然而，其有效性和临床相关性受到了质疑。许多功能表现测试仅评估矢状面或向前方向，可能仅部分评估了一个人的运动能力。需要可靠且有效的功能测试以多方向方式进行评估。
目的/假设：本研究的目的是确定一种新型多方向定时单腿跳测试（T型钻跳测试）在康复和表现评估中的重测信度。
横断面信度研究。
五十名年龄在18至35岁之间（平均年龄23.48，标准差3.82）、健康且有休闲运动习惯的大学生受试者（23名男性和27名女性）同意进行该测试。受试者沿着一个10英尺×10英尺的“T”形路线跳跃。受试者每条腿进行两次定时最大努力的T型钻跳测试，两次测试日之间间隔3至7天。计算组内相关系数（ICC）以确定测试间信度。
50名受试者的组间信度（ICC）在0.98至1.00之间，表明信度极佳。使用配对t检验对T型钻跳测试进行双侧比较，结果显示男性和女性优势腿与非优势腿的时间得分之间均无显著差异（p>0.05）。
本研究表明T型钻跳测试具有出色的重测信度。在作为临床功能表现测试进行验证和应用之前，这些结果很重要。
2级。
Zotero 插件