Department of Plastic Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Na Bulovce University Hospital, Budínova 67/2, 180 81, Prague 8-Libeň, Czech Republic.
Department of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Institute of Physiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská, 1083, 142 20, Prague 4-Krč, Czech Republic.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;45(6):2952-2970. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02396-z. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
The volume effect of fat grafting is highly dependent on the presence of viable adipocytes and other nucleated cells within the lipoaspirate. We suspected that one of the crucial factors influencing cell viability is the negative pressure applied during the fat graft harvesting and the suitability of various harvest sites when compared to others. Despite much discussion, there is no consensus on the optimal negative pressure or the best site for harvesting so we designed an experiment to test this.
Fat graft taken under low negative pressure (- 200 mmHg) or high negative pressure (- 700 mmHg) from the thigh or abdominal regions from 21 healthy human donors was evaluated. The principal variables studied were: a) total number and viability of nucleated cells, b) liposuction duration and c) blood admixture. Other variables studied were body mass index, the impact of age and enzymatic digestion.
The absolute number and viability of nucleated cells and the blood admixture did not differ significantly between lipoaspirates obtained under different vacuum conditions or from different regions. The time taken to acquire the same volume of lipoaspirate was significantly increased using low negative pressure. The time taken to collect cells in the thigh region significantly increased with increasing BMI but this correlation was not found when harvesting in the abdominal region. The BMI and age did not impact the results in any of the measured variables. The enzymatic digestion rate was independent of the negative pressure used to harvest.
Our results indicate that neither the negative pressure used nor the area chosen has any significant influence on the viability and yield of harvested cells. The time taken to obtain lipoaspirate using low pressure is significantly longer than when using high pressure. No significant difference was found in the value of blood admixture using different vacuum pressures, and no correlation exists between the body mass index and the cell viability or age of the patients and the time of liposuction.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
脂肪移植的体积效果高度依赖于脂肪抽吸物中存活的脂肪细胞和其他有核细胞。我们怀疑影响细胞活力的一个关键因素是脂肪移植采集过程中施加的负压以及与其他部位相比,各种采集部位的适宜性。尽管讨论很多,但对于最佳负压或最佳采集部位仍没有共识,因此我们设计了一项实验来对此进行测试。
从 21 位健康供体的大腿或腹部区域以低负压(-200mmHg)或高负压(-700mmHg)采集脂肪移植,评估以下主要变量:a)有核细胞的总数和活力;b)吸脂时间;c)血液混合。研究的其他变量包括体重指数、年龄和酶消化的影响。
在不同负压条件下或不同部位采集的脂肪抽吸物中,有核细胞的绝对数量和活力以及血液混合没有显著差异。使用低负压获得相同体积的脂肪抽吸物所需的时间明显增加。大腿部位采集细胞所需的时间随着 BMI 的增加而显著增加,但在腹部区域采集时未发现这种相关性。BMI 和年龄对任何测量变量的结果均无影响。酶消化率与用于采集的负压无关。
我们的结果表明,所使用的负压或选择的区域都对收获细胞的活力和产量没有明显影响。使用低压力获得脂肪抽吸物所需的时间明显长于使用高压力。使用不同的真空压力,血液混合的数值没有显著差异,BMI 与患者的细胞活力或年龄以及吸脂时间之间没有相关性。
证据水平 III:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。