Department of Philosophy, Linguistics & Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bioethics. 2021 Sep;35(7):688-695. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12903. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
The birth of the world's first genetically edited babies in 2018 provoked considerable ethical outrage. Nonetheless, many scientists and bioethicists now advocate the pursuit of clinical uses of human germline gene editing. Progress towards this goal will require research, including clinical trials where genetically edited embryos are implanted into a woman's uterus, gestated, and brought to term. This paper argues that such trials would likely conflict with the fundamental research ethical requirement of non-exploitation. This is because they would expose people who are in a vulnerable situation to risks and burdens that are substantial and not obviously offset by compensating benefits. I consider how the potential for exploitation in such trials might be mitigated, arguing that a feasible and justifiable approach is not easily found. If this analysis is correct, there is a significant ethical obstacle on the path towards clinical use of human germline gene editing.
2018 年,世界上首例基因编辑婴儿的诞生引发了相当大的伦理愤怒。尽管如此,许多科学家和生物伦理学家现在主张追求人类生殖系基因编辑的临床应用。朝着这一目标前进将需要研究,包括将基因编辑胚胎植入女性子宫、孕育并足月分娩的临床试验。本文认为,此类试验可能与非剥削的基本研究伦理要求相冲突。这是因为它们会使处于弱势地位的人面临重大的风险和负担,而这些风险和负担并没有通过补偿性收益得到明显弥补。我考虑了在这些试验中可能出现的剥削潜力,并认为减轻这种风险的可行且合理的方法并不容易找到。如果这种分析是正确的,那么在临床应用人类生殖系基因编辑的道路上存在着重大的伦理障碍。