Joseph Andrew M, Karas Monica, Ramadan Yaseen, Joubran Ernesto, Jacobs Robin J
Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Research/Health Informatics/Medical Education, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Cureus. 2022 Nov 27;14(11):e31927. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31927. eCollection 2022 Nov.
Human genome editing has been increasingly explored to determine if it can be used to eradicate genetic diseases like sickle cell disease, but it has also been surrounded by a wide variety of ethical dilemmas. The purpose of this review was to conduct a scoping review of the ethics of therapeutic human genome editing in terms of philosophy, theology, public perspectives, and research ethics. A systemized search of PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science was conducted. The initial search resulted in 4,445 articles, and after removing 1,750 duplicates and screening the remaining 2,695 articles, 27 final articles were selected for the final analysis. From a philosophical and theological standpoint, therapeutic human genome editing was generally ethically acceptable. Worldwide public perspectives were also in agreement except for the Oceanic region, which disagreed mainly due to the possible effects on future generations. Lastly, human research ethics revealed that women were not always included in informed consent, and that child autonomy needs to be preserved. Further research is needed to determine adverse effects on the mother, fetus, and future generations.
人类基因编辑已得到越来越多的探索,以确定其是否可用于根除镰状细胞病等遗传疾病,但它也被各种各样的伦理困境所包围。本综述的目的是从哲学、神学、公众观点和研究伦理等方面,对治疗性人类基因编辑的伦理进行范围界定综述。我们对PubMed、Embase、Ovid MEDLINE和Web of Science进行了系统检索。初步检索得到4445篇文章,在去除1750篇重复文章并筛选其余2695篇文章后,选择了27篇最终文章进行最终分析。从哲学和神学的角度来看,治疗性人类基因编辑在伦理上总体是可以接受的。除大洋洲地区外,全球公众观点也一致,该地区主要因对后代可能产生的影响而持不同意见。最后,人类研究伦理表明,女性并不总是被纳入知情同意范围,儿童的自主权需要得到保护。需要进一步研究以确定对母亲、胎儿和后代的不利影响。