• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quality of care for people with multimorbidity: a focus group study with patients and their relatives.患有多种疾病的人群的护理质量:对患者及其亲属的焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 15;11(6):e047025. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047025.
2
[Development of guideline-based quality indicators: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitating factors from the perspective of S3-guideline authors].[基于指南的质量指标的制定:从S3指南作者角度对障碍和促进因素的定性研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
3
Patient-reported quality indicators for osteoarthritis: a patient and public generated self-report measure for primary care.骨关节炎患者报告的质量指标:一项由患者和公众生成的初级保健自我报告测量方法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 17;2:5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0019-x. eCollection 2016.
4
International experiences in the development and implementation of guideline-based quality indicators: a qualitative study.国际上基于指南的质量指标的制定和实施经验:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):e039770. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039770.
5
[Methodological Standard for the Development of Quality Indicators within Clinical Practice Guidelines - Results of a structured consensus process].[临床实践指南中质量指标制定的方法标准——结构化共识过程的结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Feb;160:21-33. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.11.008. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
[Development of an indicator set for the evaluation of the population-based integrated healthcare model 'Gesundes Kinzigtal' (Healthy Kinzigtal)].[用于评估基于人群的综合医疗模式“健康金齐山谷”(Gesundes Kinzigtal)的指标集的开发]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Apr;150-152:54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 May 25.
7
[(How) Are quality indicators for measuring and appraising the quality of healthcare derived from evidence-based clinical practice guidelines? A review].[(如何)从循证临床实践指南中得出用于衡量和评估医疗质量的质量指标?一项综述]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
8
Guideline-based quality indicators-a systematic comparison of German and international clinical practice guidelines: protocol for a systematic review.基于指南的质量指标——德国与国际临床实践指南的系统比较:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 12;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0669-2.
9
Quality indicators for in-hospital pharmaceutical care of Dutch elderly patients: development and validation of an ACOVE-based quality indicator set.荷兰老年患者住院药学服务质量指标:基于 ACOVE 的质量指标集的制定和验证。
Drugs Aging. 2011 Apr 1;28(4):295-304. doi: 10.2165/11587700-000000000-00000.
10
The professional perspective on patient involvement in the development of quality indicators: a qualitative analysis using the example of chronic heart failure in the German health care setting.医疗专业人员对患者参与质量指标制定的看法:以德国医疗环境中的慢性心力衰竭为例进行的定性分析
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jan 22;9:151-9. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S74064. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Attributes of family physician encounters valued by older adults: a systematic review.老年人重视的家庭医生诊疗属性:一项系统综述。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Mar 28;26(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02794-1.
2
Unmasking vaccine hesitancy and refusal: a deep dive into Anti-vaxxer perspectives on COVID-19 in Spain.揭开疫苗犹豫和拒绝的面纱:深入探讨西班牙反疫苗者对 COVID-19 的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;24(1):1751. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18864-5.
3
Validation of patient- and GP-reported core sets of quality indicators for older adults with multimorbidity in primary care: results of the cross-sectional observational MULTIqual validation study.基于初级保健中老年多病患者的患者和全科医生报告的核心质量指标集的验证:多质量验证研究的横断面观察结果。
BMC Med. 2023 Apr 17;21(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02856-0.
4
[Do General Practitioners have Experience with Social Care Points? A Berlin-Wide Survey].[全科医生有社会护理点方面的经验吗?一项全柏林范围的调查]
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Nov;85(11):1010-1015. doi: 10.1055/a-2035-9289. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
5
Integrated care for older multimorbid heart failure patients: protocol for the ESCAPE randomized trial and cohort study.老年多病共存心力衰竭患者综合管理:ESCAPE 随机试验和队列研究方案。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;10(3):2051-2065. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14294. Epub 2023 Mar 12.
6
German general practitioners' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic and how it affected their patient care: A qualitative study.德国全科医生在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历,以及这如何影响他们的患者护理:一项定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec;29(2):2156498. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2156498. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
7
Experiences of patients with multimorbidity with primary care and the association with patient activation: a cross-sectional study in Germany.患有多种疾病的患者在初级保健方面的体验及其与患者激活之间的关联:德国的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 8;12(8):e059100. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059100.
8
Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire.适应和验证德国版的多病症治疗负担问卷。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Jun 3;20(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01993-z.
9
Measuring the Quality of Care for Older Adults With Multimorbidity: Results of the MULTIqual Project.衡量多病共存老年人的医疗质量:MULTIqual 项目的结果。
Gerontologist. 2022 Sep 7;62(8):1135-1146. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac013.
10
Self-management perspectives of elderly patients with multimorbidity and practitioners - status, challenges and further support needed?多病共存的老年患者和医生的自我管理视角——现状、挑战和进一步需要的支持?
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Nov 26;22(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01584-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' and physicians' perspectives and experiences on the quality of medical consultations: a qualitative study.患者和医生对医疗咨询质量的看法和体验:一项定性研究。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Jun;18(2):247-255. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000210.
2
A multidisciplinary self-management intervention among patients with multimorbidity and the impact of socioeconomic factors on results.多学科多病种自我管理干预对多种疾病患者的影响及社会经济因素对结果的影响。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Apr 22;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0943-6.
3
Quality of care assessment for people with multimorbidity.多病症患者的护理质量评估。
J Intern Med. 2019 Mar;285(3):289-300. doi: 10.1111/joim.12881.
4
Evidence supporting the best clinical management of patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a systematic guideline review and expert consensus.支持多病共存和多种药物治疗患者最佳临床管理的证据:系统指南综述和专家共识。
J Intern Med. 2019 Mar;285(3):272-288. doi: 10.1111/joim.12842. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
5
Standard set of health outcome measures for older persons.老年人健康结局测量标准集。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Feb 2;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0701-3.
6
Multiple Chronic Conditions in Spousal Caregivers of Older Adults With Functional Disability: Associations With Caregiving Difficulties and Gains.老年有功能障碍患者的配偶照顾者的多重慢性病:与照顾困难和获益的关联。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 1;75(1):160-172. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx118.
7
Evaluating quality in endoscopy.评估内镜质量。
Endoscopy. 2017 Jun;49(6):581-587. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-104380. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
8
'Potentially inappropriate or specifically appropriate?' Qualitative evaluation of general practitioners views on prescribing, polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people.“潜在不适当还是特别适当?”对全科医生关于老年人处方、多重用药及潜在不适当处方观点的定性评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Aug 11;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0507-y.
9
Patients' handling of a standardized medication plan: a pilot study and method development.患者对标准化药物治疗方案的执行情况:一项试点研究及方法开发
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Apr 22;10:621-30. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S96431. eCollection 2016.
10
Overutilization of ambulatory medical care in the elderly German population?--An empirical study based on national insurance claims data and a review of foreign studies.德国老年人群门诊医疗服务的过度使用情况?——一项基于国家保险理赔数据的实证研究及国外研究综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 14;16:129. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1357-y.

患有多种疾病的人群的护理质量:对患者及其亲属的焦点小组研究。

Quality of care for people with multimorbidity: a focus group study with patients and their relatives.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 15;11(6):e047025. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047025.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047025
PMID:34130962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8208013/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prevalence of people with multimorbidity rises. Multimorbidity constitutes a challenge to the healthcare system, and treatment of patients with multimorbidity is prone to high-quality variations. Currently, no set of quality indicators (QIs) exists to assess quality of care, let alone incorporating the patient perspective. We therefore aim to identify aspects of quality of care relevant to the patients' perspective and match them to a literature-based set of QIs.

METHODS

We conducted eight focus groups with patients with multimorbidity and three focus groups with patients' relatives using a semistructured guide. Data were analysed using Kuckartz's qualitative content analysis. We derived deductive categories from the literature, added inductive categories (new quality aspects) and translated them into QI.

RESULTS

We created four new QIs based on the quality aspects relevant to patients/relatives. Two QIs (patient education/self-management, regular updates of medication plans) were consented by an expert panel, while two others were not (periodical check-ups, general practitioner-coordinated care). Half of the literature-based QIs, for example, assessment of biopsychosocial support needs, were supported by participants' accounts, while more technical domains regarding assessment and treatment regimens were not addressed in the focus groups.

CONCLUSION

We show that focus groups with patients and relatives adding relevant aspects in QI development should be incorporated by default in QI development processes and constitute a reasonable addition to traditional QI development. Our QI set constitutes a framework for assessing the quality of care in the German healthcare system. It will facilitate implementation of treatment standards and increase the use of existing guidelines, hereby helping to reduce overuse, underuse and misuse of healthcare resources in the treatment of patients with multimorbidity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

German clinical trials registry (DRKS00015718), Pre-Results.

摘要

背景

患有多种疾病的人群比例不断上升。多种疾病给医疗体系带来了挑战,同时也增加了治疗多种疾病患者的难度,导致治疗质量参差不齐。目前,尚无一套质量指标(QI)用于评估医疗质量,更不用说纳入患者视角了。因此,我们旨在确定与患者视角相关的医疗质量方面,并将其与基于文献的一套质量指标相匹配。

方法

我们使用半结构化指南,对患有多种疾病的患者进行了 8 组焦点小组讨论,对患者的亲属进行了 3 组焦点小组讨论。使用 Kuckartz 的定性内容分析法对数据进行分析。我们从文献中推导出演绎类别,添加了归纳类别(新的质量方面)并将其转化为 QI。

结果

我们根据与患者/亲属相关的质量方面创建了四个新的 QI。两个 QI(患者教育/自我管理、定期更新药物计划)得到了专家小组的认可,而另外两个 QI(定期检查、全科医生协调护理)则没有得到认可。例如,基于文献的 QI 中的一半,即评估生物心理社会支持需求,得到了参与者的认可,而焦点小组中没有涉及更多关于评估和治疗方案的技术领域。

结论

我们表明,默认情况下,应将患者和亲属焦点小组纳入 QI 开发,以补充传统的 QI 开发。我们的 QI 集构成了评估德国医疗体系医疗质量的框架。它将有助于实施治疗标准并增加现有指南的使用,从而有助于减少治疗多种疾病患者的医疗资源过度使用、使用不足和滥用。

试验注册号

德国临床试验注册处(DRKS00015718),预结果。