Tabatabaei Meisam, Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha Homa, Yang Yi, Aghbashlo Mortaza, Lam Su Shiung, Montgomery Hugh, Peng Wanxi
Henan Province Forest Resources Sustainable Development and High-value Utilization Engineering Research Center, School of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE), Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries (AKUATROP), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia.
J Clean Prod. 2021 Sep 1;313:127880. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127880. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization identified SARS-CoV-2 as a public health emergency of global concern. Accordingly, the demand for personal protective equipment (PPE), including medical face masks, has sharply risen compared with 2019. The new situation has led to a sharp increase in energy demand and the environmental impacts associated with these product systems. Hence, the pandemic's effects on the environmental consequences of various PPE types, such as medical face masks, should be assessed. In light of that, the current study aimed to identify the environmental hot-spots of medical face mask production and consumption by using life cycle assessment (LCA) and tried to provide solutions to mitigate the adverse impacts. Based on the results obtained, in 2020, medical face masks production using fossil-based plastics causes the loss of 2.03 × 10 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs); 1.63 × 10 PDFmyr damage to ecosystem quality; the climate-damaging release of 2.13 × 10 kg CO; and 5.65 × 10 MJ damage to resources. Besides, annual medical face mask production results in 5.88 × 10 TJ demand for exergy. On the other hand, if used makes are not appropriately handled, they can lead to 4.99 × 10 Pt/yr additional damage to the environment in 2020 as determined by the EDIP 2003. Replacement of fossil-based plastics with bio-based plastics, at rates ranging from 10 to 100%, could mitigate the product's total yearly environmental damage by 4-43%, respectively Our study calls attention to the environmental sustainability of PPE used to prevent virus transmission in the current and future pandemics.
2020年1月30日,世界卫生组织将严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)确定为全球关注的突发公共卫生事件。因此,与2019年相比,包括医用口罩在内的个人防护装备(PPE)的需求急剧上升。这种新情况导致了能源需求的急剧增加以及与这些产品系统相关的环境影响。因此,应评估疫情对各种个人防护装备(如医用口罩)的环境后果的影响。有鉴于此,本研究旨在通过生命周期评估(LCA)确定医用口罩生产和消费的环境热点,并试图提供减轻不利影响的解决方案。根据所得结果,2020年,使用化石基塑料生产医用口罩导致损失2.03×10伤残调整生命年(DALYs);对生态系统质量造成1.63×10 PDFmyr的损害;气候破坏排放2.13×10 千克二氧化碳;对资源造成5.65×10 兆焦耳的损害。此外,医用口罩的年产量导致火用需求为5.88×10 太焦耳。另一方面,如果使用后的口罩处理不当,根据2003年的《丹麦环境影响评价模型》(EDIP 2003),2020年它们可能会对环境造成每年4.99×10 铂的额外损害。用生物基塑料以10%至100%的比例替代化石基塑料,可分别将该产品每年的总环境损害减轻4%至43%。我们的研究呼吁关注在当前和未来疫情中用于预防病毒传播的个人防护装备的环境可持续性。