Lee Amos Wei Lun, Neo Edward Ren Kai, Khoo Zi-Yu, Yeo Zhiquan, Tan Yee Shee, Chng Shuyun, Yan Wenjin, Lok Boon Keng, Low Jonathan Sze Choong
Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology, Singapore.
Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021 Jul;170:105580. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105580. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented amount of face mask consumption around the world. The increase in face mask consumption has brought focus to their environmental impact. To keep up with the increased demand for face masks, different variations of reusable face masks such as the embedded filtration layer (EFL) reusable face mask have emerged in the market. This study quantifies the environmental impact of the EFL reusable face mask and the single-use surgical face mask.
The life cycle assessment (LCA) study of the entire value chain from cradle-to-grave is applied to each face mask. Both face masks are evaluated over 1 functional unit (FU) of 31 12-h days for a single person. The ReCiPe method with the Hierachist perspective was applied. A total of nine impact categories as well as the generated waste of each face mask are evaluated.
The results show that for 1 functional unit, the use of single-use surgical face mask and EFL reusable face mask will contribute 0.580 kg CO-eq and 0.338 kg CO-eq to climate change and generate 0.004 kg and 0.0004 kg of waste respectively.
Comparing both face masks, the EFL reusable face mask will have a lower emission of at least 30% in terms of the generated waste and the impact categories considered, except for water depletion, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, and human toxicity.
新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情的爆发导致全球口罩消费量达到前所未有的水平。口罩消费量的增加引发了人们对其环境影响的关注。为了满足对口罩不断增长的需求,市场上出现了不同类型的可重复使用口罩,如嵌入式过滤层(EFL)可重复使用口罩。本研究量化了EFL可重复使用口罩和一次性外科口罩的环境影响。
对每种口罩应用从摇篮到坟墓的整个价值链的生命周期评估(LCA)研究。两种口罩均针对一个人的31个12小时工作日的1个功能单位(FU)进行评估。应用了具有层级视角的ReCiPe方法。总共评估了九个影响类别以及每种口罩产生的废物。
结果表明,对于1个功能单位,使用一次性外科口罩和EFL可重复使用口罩将分别对气候变化贡献0.580千克二氧化碳当量和0.338千克二氧化碳当量,并分别产生0.004千克和0.0004千克废物。
比较两种口罩,就产生的废物和所考虑的影响类别而言,EFL可重复使用口罩的排放量至少低30%,但水资源耗竭、淡水富营养化、海洋富营养化和人体毒性除外。